Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:22:17.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urartian crop plant remains from Patnos (Aǧri), eastern Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Emel Oybak Dönmez
Emel Oybak Dönmez
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University, Ankara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The analysis of eight samples of carbonised plant material from the Patnos area (Aǧri), an important site of the Urartian period in eastern Turkey is presented. Bread/macaroni wheat (Triticum aestivum L./T. durum Desf.) and domesticated emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum Schübl.) are the main crop plants. Hulled barley (Hordeum L.) is less abundantly represented. Pulse seeds, bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia (L.) Willd.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) and Latyhrus L.-type were found in smaller numbers. A few wild seeds were also recorded.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin doǧusunda, Urartu Uygarlıǧı'nın önemli yerleşim yerlerinden biri olan Patnos yöresindeki (Aǧn) kazılarda alınan sekiz arkeobotanik örneǧin içindeki kömürleşmiş bitki kısımlarının analiz sonuçları verilmektedir. Analiz sonuçları, Urartular döneminde, Patnos bölgesinde ekmeklik/sert buǧdayın (Triticum aestivum L./T. durum Desf.) ve evcilleştirilmiş iki-sıralı buǧdayın (Triticum dicoccum Schübl.) temel tarla bitkileri olduǧunu göstermiştir. Kabuklu arpa (Hordeum L.) taneleri daha az miktardadır. Çok daha az miktarda bakliyata ait burçak (Vicia ervilia (L.) Willd.), mercimek (Lens culinaris Medik.) ve mürdümük-tip (Latyhrus L.) tohumları bulunmuştur. Yine çok az miktarda yabani bitki meyveleri/tohumları kaydedilmiştir.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 53 , December 2003 , pp. 89 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balkan, K 1960: ‘Patnos yakınında Anzavurtepe'de bulunan Urartu tapınaǧi ve kitabeleri’ Anatolia 5: 133–58Google Scholar
Balkan, K 1964: ‘Patnos'ta keşfedilen Urartu tapınaǧı ve Urartu sarayı’ in Türk Tarih Kurumu Yıllık Konferansları, Atatürk Konferanslari. Ankara: 235–43Google Scholar
Cocharro, L P, Rigamonti, A, Castelletti, L, Maspero, A 2001: ‘Preliminary report on the plant remains from Ayanis’ in A, ÇilingiroǧluSalvini, M (eds), Ayanis I. Ten Years' Excavations at Rusahinili Eidurukai 1989–1998. Rome: 391–6Google Scholar
Nesbitt, M 1993: ‘Ancient crop husbandry at Kaman-Kalehöyük: 1991 archaeobotanical report’ in Mikasa, T (ed.), Essays on Anatolian Archaeology (Bulletin of the Middle Eastern Culture Center in Japan VII). Wiesbaden: 75–97Google Scholar
Nesbitt, M, Samuel, D 1996: ‘Archaeobotany in Turkey: a review of current research’ Orient-Express 3: 91–6Google Scholar
Riehl, S 1999: Bronze Age Environment and Economy in the Troad: the Archaeobotany of Kumtepe and Troy. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Riehl, S, Nesbitt, M 2003: ‘Crops and cultivation in the Iron Age Near East: change or continuity?’ in Fischer, B, Genz, H, Jean, E, Köroǧlu, K (eds), Identifying Changes: The Transition from Bronze Age to Iron Ages in Anatolia and its Neighbouring Regions (Proceedings of the International Workshop Istanbul, November 8–9 2002). Istanbul: 301–14Google Scholar
Zimansky, P E 1985: Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Zimansky, P E 1998: Ancient Ararat: A Handbook of Urartian Studies. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Zohary, D, Hopf, M 1994: Domestication of Plants in the Old World. OxfordGoogle Scholar