Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:49:36.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations at Sos Höyük 1994: First Preliminary Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Antonio Sagona ,
Claudia Sagona  and
Hilmi Özkorucuklu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Collaborative Australian–Turkish archaeological investigations in north-eastern Anatolia, begun in 1988 in the Bayburt province (then an ilçe of Gümüşhane), continued for six weeks during June–July 1994 with excavations at Sos Höyük near Erzurum. The decision to extend the limits of the research project beyond the Bayburt plain, eastwards into the adjacent province, was based primarily on the need to address questions raised by our work in Bayburt, most notably the apparent gaps in its culture sequence. Further, we were acutely aware that in order to establish a sequence for north-east Anatolia we would need to reexamine by systematic excavations the human settlement of the Erzurum plain, long known from the early campaigns of H. Z. Koşay and his colleagues at Karaz, Güzelova and Pulur, and I. K. Kökten's pioneering surveys. Our interest in the site of Sos Höyük was roused by material excavated during a three week campaign in the summer of 1987 by a team from Atatürk University (Erzurum) and Erzurum museum. While some of the material clearly keyed into the Bayburt sequence, much of it did not. A visit to the site revealed a dense surface scatter of artefacts, especially obsidian, and substantial stratified deposits exposed by the diggings of the local villagers. The potentialities of the site were clear. With the material excavated at Büyüktepe and collected in the Bayburt province overlapping and complementing that at Sos, we would move closer toward an understanding of cultural developments in north-east Anatolia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 45 , December 1995 , pp. 193 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Algaze, G., (ed.), 1990. Town and Country in Southeastern Anatolia, vol. II: The Stratigraphic Sequence at Kurban Höyük (OIP 110), Chicago.Google Scholar
Burney, C. A. and Lang, D. M., 1971. The Peoples of the Hills: Ancient Ararat and Caucasus, London.Google Scholar
Çilingiroğlu, A., 1984. “The Second Millennium Painted Pottery Tradition of the Van Lake Basin”, AS 34: 129–39.Google Scholar
Dzhaparidze, O., 1961. K Istorii Aruzinskikh Plemen Na Rannei Stadii Medio-Bronzovoi Kultury, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Dzhaparidze, O., 1991. Arkheologiia Gruzii: Kamennyi vek i Epokha Bronzy, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Dzhaparidze, O., (ed.), 1992. Arkheologiia Gruzii II: Gruziia v Epokhu Eneolita i Rannei Bronzy, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Dzhaparidze, O., 1993. “Über die Ethnokulturelle Situation in Georgien Gegen Ende des 3. Jahrtausends v. Chr.”, in Frangipane, M., Hauptmann, H., Liverani, M., Matthiae, P. and Mellink, M. (eds) Between the Rivers and Over the Mountains: Archaeologica Anatolica et Mesopotamia Alba Palmieri Dedicata, Rome, pp. 475–91.Google Scholar
Dzhavakhishvili, A. and Glonti, L., 1962, Urbnisi I: Arkheologicheskie Raskopki, Provedennye v 1954–1961 gg na Selichshe Kvatskhelebi, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Esaian, S. A., 1981. “Skul'ptura Armenii Epokhi Rannei Bronzy”, in Litvinskogo, B. A. (ed.) Kavkaz i Sredniaia Aziia v Drevnosti i Srednevekovye: Istoriia i Kul'tura, Moscow, pp. 5–19.Google Scholar
Gogadze, E. M., 1972. Periodizatsiia i Genezis Kurgannoi Kul'tury Trialeti, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Kavtaradze, G., 1983. K Khronologii Epokhi Eneolita i Bronzy Gruzii, TbilisiGoogle Scholar
Kiguradze, T. V., 1986. Neolithische Siedlungen von Kvemo-Kartli, Georgien, Munich.Google Scholar
Kökten, I. K., 1944. “Orta-Doğu ve Kuzey Anadolu'da yapılan Tarihöncesi Araştirmaları”, Belleten 8: 659–80.Google Scholar
Kökten, I. K., 1947. “1945 Yılında Türk Tarih Kurumu Adına Yapılan Tarihöncesi Araştırmaları”, Belleten 11: 431–72.Google Scholar
Koşay, H. Z. and Turfan, K., 1959. “Erzurum-Karaz Kazısı Raporu”, Belleten 23: 349–413.Google Scholar
Koşay, H. Z. and Vary, H., 1964. Pulur Kazısı 1960. Mevsimi Çalışmaları Raporu. Die Ausgrabungen von Pulur. Bericht über die Kampagne von 1960 (Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları Nr. 24. Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi-Arkeoloji Serisi Nr. 9), Ankara.Google Scholar
Koşay, H. Z. and Vary, H., 1967. Güzelova Kazısı. Ausgrabungen von Güzelova (Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları Nr. 46. Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi-Araştırmaları Seri 20), Ankara.Google Scholar
Kuftin, B. A., 1941. Arkheologicheskie Raskopki v Trialeti I; Oput Periodizatsii Pamiatnikov, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
McNicoll, A., 1983. Taşkun Kale: Keban Rescue Excavations, Eastern Anatolia (BIAA Monograph no.6, BAR International Series 168), Oxford.Google Scholar
Maxwell-Hyslop, K. R., 1971. Western Asiatic Jewellery c. 3000–612 B. C., London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S., 1980. Aşvan Kale: The Hellenistic, Roman and Islamic Sites (BIAA Monograph no.l, BAR International Series 80), Oxford.Google Scholar
Moore, J., 1993. Tille Höyük 1: The Medieval Period (BIAA Monograph no. 14), Ankara.Google Scholar
Rubinson, K., 1977. “The Chronology of the Middle Bronze Kurgans at Trialeti”, In Levine, L. and Young, T. Jr., (eds) Mountains and Lowlands: Essays in the Archaeology of Greater Mesopotamia, Malibu, pp. 236–49.Google Scholar
Sagona, A. G. 1984. The Caucasian Region in the Early Bronze Age (BAR International Series 214), Oxford.Google Scholar
Sagona, A. G., 1994. The Aşvan Sites 3. Keban Rescue Excavations, Eastern Anatolia: The Early Bronze Age (BIAA Monograph 18), Ankara.Google Scholar
Sagona, A. G., Pemberton, E. and McPhee, I., 1993. “Excavations at Büyüktepe Höyük, 1992: Third Preliminary Report”, AS 43: 69–83.Google Scholar