Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:10:25.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Banding Techniques for Zygosity Diagnosis in Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Ursula Friedrich ,
Troels Lyngbye  and
Jakob Øster
Ursula Friedrich*
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Genetics, Aarhus University, and Department of Pediatrics, Central Hospital of Randers Denmark
Troels Lyngbye
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Genetics, Aarhus University, and Department of Pediatrics, Central Hospital of Randers Denmark
Jakob Øster
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Genetics, Aarhus University, and Department of Pediatrics, Central Hospital of Randers Denmark
*
Institut for Human Genetik, Aarhus Universitet, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Detailed comparison of human variant chromosomes found by Q- and C-banding technique is performed in a pair of twins to show that these variants can be used for zygosity diagnosis.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1977 , pp. 89 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1977

References

REFERENCES

Hecht, F. 1971. Cited in a talk given by van Dyke D.L. in Portland 1974.Google Scholar
Holbek, S., Friedrich, U., Brostrøm, K., Bruun Petersen, G., 1974. Monosomy for the centromeric and juxtacentromeric region of chromosome 21. Humangenetik, 24: 191–195.Google Scholar
Müller, H.J., Klinger, H.P., Glasser, M., 1975. Chromosome polymorphism in a human newborn population. II. Potentials of polymorphic chromosome variants for characterizing the idiogram of an individual. Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 15: 239–255.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, D.L., Palmer, C.G., Nance, W.E. 1974. Chromosome polymorphism and twin zygosity. Abstract in Am. J. Hum. Genet., 26: 88a, and personal communication.Google Scholar