Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:04:30.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intrapair Difference in Personality Traits, and Emotional and Social Adjustment in Monozygotic Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Svenn Torgersen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, Vinderen, Norway
*
Institute of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, Vinderen, Box 230, Oslo 3, Norway

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the last decade, there has been a growing interest in the advantages that MZ twin pairs offer for studying the effect of environmental factors on the development of emotional disturbances. Much of this research has been aimed at investigating the relationship between childhood differences and later discordance with regard to schizophrenia in MZ twin pairs. A few studies have used similar methodology to investigate the development of neurotic reactions. There has been very little work dealing with the causes of discordance in the normal personality development of MZ twin pairs. The paper presents some of the results from a larger twin project which show the relationship between childhood differences and differences in adulthood. The study examined differences in oral, obsessive, and hysterical personality traits, as well as differences in phobic fears, general neurotic symptomatology, occupational and marriage adjustment in 50 relatively unselected MZ twin pairs. The results show that many of the same childhood differences which have been reported to be associated with the discordance found in regard to schizophrenia and neuroses, are also related to differences in personality structure, emotional and social adjustment in less disturbed MZ twin pairs. Other childhood differences, however, seem to be more specifically related either to neurotic or to normal personality development, pointing to the importance of studying the relationship between specific intrapair differences in childhood and differences in various areas of later personality development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1977

References

REFERENCES

Bracken, H.v. 1936. Ueber die Sonderart der Subjectiven Welt von Zwillingen. Arch. Ges. Psychol., 97: 97105.Google Scholar
Burlingham, D. 1952. Twins, a Study of Three Pairs of Identical Twins. London: Imago Publishing Co. Google Scholar
Dencker, S. J. 1958. A follow-up study of 128 closed head injuries using co-twins as controls. Acta Psychiat. Scand. 33 (Suppl.), 123.Google Scholar
Jacobson, E. 1965. Psykoneuroser (I). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Lazare, A., Klerman, G.L., Armor, D.J. 1966. Oral, obsessive and hysterical personality patterns. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 14: 624630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, E. 1953. Psychotic and neurotic illnesses in twins. London: Spec. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Coun. 278.Google Scholar
Stabenau, J.R. 1973. Schizophrenia: a family's projective identification. Am. J. Psychiatry, 130: 1923.Google Scholar
Tienari, P. 1963. Psychiatric illnesses in identical twins. Acta Psychiat. Scand. 39 (Suppl.), 171.Google Scholar
Tienari, P. 1966. On intrapair differences in male twins. Acta Psychiat. Scand. 42 (Suppl.), 188.Google Scholar
Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E. 1970. Blood pressure and personality differences in MZ twins. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 19: 269272.Google Scholar