Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:52:09.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dermatoglyphics in Patients of Congenital Heart Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

I. Emerit
Affiliation:
Chaire de Cardiologie, Hôpital Broussais, Paris (Directeur: Prof. P. Soulié)
P. Vernant
Affiliation:
Chaire de Cardiologie, Hôpital Broussais, Paris (Directeur: Prof. P. Soulié)
P. Corone
Affiliation:
Chaire de Cardiologie, Hôpital Broussais, Paris (Directeur: Prof. P. Soulié)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Palm-print and finger-print patterns were studied in a series of 330 patients with congenital heart disease and compared to a control group of 200 patients with acquired heart disease.

156 patiens had associated malformations, while 174 other patients had isolated heart disease. Both groups were studied separately.

Simian creases are more frequent in the malformed patients than in the controls, but the difference is only significant in patients with multiple malformations.

A triradius in the positions t' is seen with a higher frequency in patients with multiple malformations and in patients with isolated heart disease than in the controls. The position t” however is only more frequent in the group of patients with multiple malformations, and tends to be associated more often with a ventricular septal defect and Fallot's tetralogy than with an atrial septum defect, aortic stenosis, coarctation and patent ductus.

Hypothenar patterns are more frequent in patients than in controls.

The results concerning finger-print patterns show a diminished frequency of arches in patients with isolated heart disease compared with controls and patients with multiple malformations. Variations between the different types of congenital heart disease were not important. They are partly in agreement, partly in disagreement with the results of other authors.

21 patients with familial congenital heart disease show an increased frequency of ulnar loops and a low frequency of whorls compared to the rest of patients.

This study does not include classical chromosomal aberrations and no malformation syndromes besides the Holt-Oram syndrome and the supravalvular aortic stenosis syndrome. The first one is characterised by an increased frequency of axial triradius in the t” position and of simian creases, while the second one seems to be without any dermatoglyphic particularity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1968

References

Bibliographie

Achs, R. et al. (1966). Unusual dermatoglyphics associated with major congenital malformations. New Engl.J. Med., 275: 1273.Google Scholar
Beuren, A.J. et al. (1962). Supravalvular aortic stenosis in association with mental retardation and a certain facial appearance. Circulation, 26: 1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, F.K., Nelson, R.M. (1963). Similar congenital heart disease in siblings. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc.Surg., 45: 597,.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, H., Midlo, C. (1961). Finger Prints, Palms and Soles. Dover Publications Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Emerit, I. et al. (1965). Malformations complexes des membres supérieurs associées à une cardiopathie congénitale. A. Ge. Me. Ge., 14: 132.Google Scholar
Emerit, I. et al. (1967). Malformations extracardiaques associées à des cardiopathies congénitales. Etude statistique portant sur 1000 cas. A. Ge. Me. Ge., 16: 27.Google Scholar
Ferber, C. (1951). Ein Beitrag zur Dreigliedrigkeit des Daumens. Z- Orthop., 80: 294.Google Scholar
Francois, J. et al. (1966). Les dermatoglyphes normaux et pathologiques. J. Genet. Hum., 15: 37.Google Scholar
Gall, J.C. et al. (1966). Holt-Oram Syndrome: clinical and genetic study of a large family. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 18: 187.Google Scholar
Hale, A.R. et al. (1961). Features of palmar dermatoglyphics in congenital heart disease. Clin. Sci., 176: 125.Google Scholar
Holmes, L.B. (1965). Congenital heart disease and upper extremity deformities. New Engl. J. Med., 272: 437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, S.B. (1961). Quantitative genetics of finger-print patterns. Brit. Med. Bull., 17: 247.Google Scholar
Holt, S.B. (1964). Finger-print patterns in mongolism. Ann. Hum. Genet., 27: 279.Google Scholar
Holt, S.B. Lindsten, J. (1964). Dermatoglyphic anomalies in Turner's Syndrome. Ann. Hum. Genet., 28: 87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, S.B. Oram, S. (1960). Familial heart disease with skeletal malformations. Brit. Heart J., 22: 236.Google Scholar
Hopf, A. (1959). Die angeborenen Veränderungen des Unterarms und der Hand. Handbuch der Orthopädie. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lazaro, C. et al. (1963). Theoretical and observed frequencies of finger print pattern formulae. A. Ge. Me. Ge., 12: 162.Google Scholar
Lejeune, J. (1955). Le diagnostic palmoscopique du mongolisme. Anthrop. Diff. Sci. Types Const., 3: 275.Google Scholar
Lewis, K.B. (1964). Upper-limb cardiovascular syndrome. Circulation, 30: 113.Google Scholar
McKusick, V.A. (1961). The atriodigital syndrome. J. Chron. Dis., 14: 100.Google Scholar
Miller, J.R., Giroux, J. (1966). Dermatoglyphics in pediatric practice. J. Pediat., 69: 302.Google Scholar
Penrose, L.S. (1963). Finger-prints, palmes and chromosomes. Nature, 197: 933.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R.A. et al. (1964). Untersuchungen zur Frage der Handleisten und Furchen bei Extremitätenmissbildungen. Humangenetik, 37: 677.Google Scholar
Pons, J. (1956). Genetical intercorrelations between several dermatoglyphical traits. Acta Genet., 476.Google Scholar
Pons, J. An evaluation of the usefullness of dermatoglyphics in research. Proceed, IInd Internat. Congr. Hum. Genet., Rome, 1961, Ed. Istituto Mendel, 1458.Google Scholar
Pruzanski, W. (1964). Familial congenital malformations of the heart and upper limbs. A syndrome of Holt-Oram. Cardiologica (Basel), 45: 21.Google Scholar
Sanchez Cascos, A. (1964). Finger-print patterns in congenital heart disease. Brit. Heart J., 26: 524.Google Scholar
Sanchez Cascos, A. (1965). Palm-print pattern in congenital heart disease. Brit. Heart J., 27: 599.Google Scholar
Turpin, R., Lejeune, J. (1953). Etude dermatoglyphique de la paume des mongoliens et de leurs parents et germains. Sem. Hop. Paris, Annal. Rech. Med., 3.Google Scholar
Uchida, I.A. et al. (1961). Dermal pattern of the new autosomal trisomy syndromes. Amer. J. Dis. Child., 102: 588.Google Scholar
Uchida, I.A. Soltan, M.G. (1963). Evaluation of dermatoglyphics in medical genetics. Pediat. Clin. North Amer., 10: 409.Google Scholar
Walker, N.F. (1957). The use of dermal configurations in the diagnosis of mongolism. J. Pediat., 50: 19.Google Scholar
Weninger, M. et al. (1966). Hautleistenuntersuchungen bei angeborenen Missbildungen des Herzens und der grossen Gefässe. kiener Klin. Wschr., 78: 905.Google Scholar
Williams, J.O.M., Barrat-Boyes, B.G. (1961). Supravalvular aortic Stenosis. Circulation, 24: 1311.Google Scholar
Zetterquist, P. (1963). The syndrome of atrial septal defect, heart arythmia and hand malformations in mother and son. Acta Paediat. (Uppsala), 52: 115.Google Scholar