Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:57:56.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Congenital Anomalies in Twins in Aberdeen and Northeast Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

G. Corney ,
I. MacGillivray ,
D.M. Campbell ,
B. Thompson  and
J. Little
G. Corney*
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Human Biochemical Genetics Unit, The Galton Laboratory, University College, London, England
I. MacGillivray
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
D.M. Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
B. Thompson
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Medical Sociology Unit, Institute of Medical Sociology, Aberdeen, Scotland
J. Little
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Medical Sociology Unit, Institute of Medical Sociology, Aberdeen, Scotland
*
The Galton Laboratory, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, England

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Data with regard to the proportion of congenital malformations found at birth are presented from a survey of 657 pairs of twins of known zygosity and placentation delivered in Aberdeen and Northeast Scotland between 1968 and 1979. There was an excess of malformed individuals from monozygotic (MZ) pairs, but this did not reach statistical significance. The possible effect of monochorionic placentation in the causation of malformations in MZ twins in general is discussed. It seems that this type of placentation may be of less causative importance than has been previously suggested.

Keywords

Congenital malformationsTwinsMonozygotic pairsMonochorionic placentation
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 31 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1983

References

REFERENCES

1.Anderson, RC (1977): Congenital cardiac malformations in 109 sets of twins and triplets. Am J Cardiol 39:1045–1050.Google Scholar
2.Benirschke, K, Harper, V (1977): The acardiac anomaly. Teratology 15:311–316.Google Scholar
3.Böök, JA (1951): The incidence of congenital diseases and defects in a South Swedish population. Acta Genet Stat Med 2:289–311.Google Scholar
4.Bulmer, MG (1970): “The Biology of Twinning in Man.” Clarendon Press, pp 35–40.Google Scholar
5.Corney, G, Thompson, B, Campbell, DM, MacGillivray, I, Seedburgh, D, Timlin, D (1979): The effect of zygosity on the birth weight of twins in Aberdeen and North-East Scotland. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:353–360.Google Scholar
6.Elwood, JM, Elwood, JH (1980): “Epidemiology of Anencephalus and Spina Bifida.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 205–221.Google Scholar
7.Gittelsohn, A, Milham, S (1964): Statistical study of twins—methods. Am J Public Health 54:286–294.Google Scholar
8.Guttmacher, AF, Kohl, SG (1958): The fetus of multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol 12:528–541.Google Scholar
9.Hay, S, Wehrung, DA (1970): Congenital malformations in twins. Am J Hum Genet 22:662–678.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Hendricks, CH (1966): Twinning in relation to birth weight, mortality, and congenital anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 27:47–53.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Hoyme, HE, Higginbottom, MC, Jones, KL (1981): Vascular etiology of disruptive structural defects in monozygotic twins. Pediatrics 67:288–291.Google Scholar
12.James, WH (1976): Twinning and anencephaly. Ann Hum Biol 3:401–409.Google Scholar
13.Layde, PM, Erickson, JD, Falek, A, McCarthy, BJ (1980): Congenital malformations in twins. Am J Hum Genet 32:69–78.Google Scholar
14.Leck, I, McKeown, T, Record, RG (1965): Cardiac malformations in a population observed for six years after birth. Br J Prev Soc Med 19:49–50.Google Scholar
15.McKeown, T, Record, RG (1960): Malformations in a population observed for five years after birth. In Wolstenholme, GEW, O'Connor, CM (eds): “Ciba Foundation Symposium on Congenital Malformations.” London: J & A Churchill, pp 2–21.Google Scholar
16.Melnick, M, Myrianthopoulos, NC (1979): The effects of chorion type on normal and abnormal developmental variation on monozygous twins. Am J Med Genet 4:147–156.Google Scholar
17.Myrianthopoulos, NC (1975): Congenital malformations in twins: Epidemiologic survey. Birth Defects, Orig Art Ser XI(8):1–39.Google Scholar
18.Myrianthopoulos, NC (1978): Congenital malformations: The contribution of twin studies. Birth Defects, Orig Art Ser XIV(6A):151–165.Google Scholar
19.Myrianthopoulos, NC, Chung, CS (1974): Congenital malformations in singletons: Epidemiologic survey. Birth Defects, Orig Art Ser X(11): 1–58.Google Scholar
20.Onyskowová, Z, Doležal, A, Jedlička, V (1971): The frequency and the character of malformations in multiple birth (a preliminary report). Teratology 4:496–497.Google Scholar
21.Schinzel, AAGL, Smith, DW, Miller, JR (1979): Monozygotic twinning and structural defects. J Pediatr 95:921–930.Google Scholar
22.Stevenson, AC, Johnston, HA, Stewart, MIP, Golding, DR (1966): Congenital malformations. A report of a study of series of consecutive births in 24 centres. Bull WHO 34:(Suppl)1–127.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Weatherall, JAC (1980): “EUROCAT Guide-lines for Registration of Congenital Abnormalities and Multiple Births.” Brussels: EEC Concerted Action Project.Google Scholar
24.Weatherall, JAC, Vlietinck, RF, Van den Berghe, H (1979): EEC Concerted Action Project—European congenital anomalies and twins (EUROCAT). Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:377–379.Google Scholar