Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T23:04:20.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Moves Policy Sentiment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Robert H. Durr
Robert H. Durr
Affiliation:
Washington University, St. Louis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In spite of the fact that political eras in the United States are widely (and often ambiguously) defined in terms of a general policy sentiment or mood, political scientists have done little in the way of rigorous analysis regarding this subject. I argue that shifts in domestic policy sentiment along a liberal–conservative continuum may be understood in part as responses to changing economic expectations. Specifically, expectations of a strong economy result in greater support for liberal domestic policies, whereas anticipation of declining economic conditions pushes the national policy mood to the right. Using quarterly data for the period 1968–88, I present a multiple-time-series error correction model that lends considerable support to the hypothesis.

Type
Research Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 158 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, James E., and Chrystal, K. Alec. 1983. Political Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1982. “Does There Exist a Political Business Cycle? A Box-Tiao Analysis.” Public Choice 38:205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. N.D. “Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval.” Political Analysis. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Breusch, T. S. 1978. “Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models.” Australian Economic Papers 17:334–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Chappell, Henry, and Keech, William. 1985. “A New View of Political Accountability for Economic Performance.” American Political Science Review 79:10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Green, Donald Philip. 1990. “The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” Research in Micropolitics 3:1–28.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1988. Citizen Politics in Western Democracies: Public Opinion and Political Parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, and France. Chathan, N.J.: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Hendry, D., Srba, F., and Yeo, S.. 1978. “Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time Series Relationship between Consumer's Expenditures and Income in the United Kingdom.” Economic Journal 88:661–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolbeare, Kenneth M. 1986. Democracy at Risk: The Politics of Economic Renewal. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Durr, Robert H. N.D. “An Essay on Cointegration and Error Correction Models.” Political Analysis. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Durr, Robert H. 1992. “What Moves Public Opinion? An Analysis of Changes in U.S. Domestic Policy Sentiment.” Ph.D. diss.. University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Edsall, Thomas Byrne. 1984. The New Politics of Inequality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Engle, Robert F., and Granger, Clive W. J.. 1987. “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55:251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1978. “Economic Retrospective Voting in American Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 22:426–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Scott. 1987. “Value Change in Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 81:1303–19.Google Scholar
Godfrey, L. G. 1978. “Testing against General Autoregression and Moving Average Error Models When the Regressors Include Lagged Dependent Variables.” Econometrica 37:424–38.Google Scholar
Granger, Clive W. J., and Newbold, Paul. 1974. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 2:111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stephen G., and Henry, S. G. B.. 1988. Macrocconomic Modelling. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Haynes, Stephen E., and Stone, J.. 1988. “Does the Political Business Cycle Dominate U.S. Unemployment and Inflation? Some New Evidence.” In Political Business Cycles, ed. Willett, Thomas D.. Durhan, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review 71:1467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1971. “The Silent Revolution in Europe: Integenerational Change in Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 65:991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katona, George. 1975. Psychological Economics. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1978. “Explaining Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 72:506–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11:129–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistic Inference. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and West, Darrell M.. 1981. “Economic Expectations and Voting Behavior in United States House and Senate Elections.” American Political Science Review 75:436–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988a. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988b. “Economics and the American Voter: Past, Present, Future.” Political Behavior 10:5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockerbie, Brad. 1989. “Changes in Party Identification: The Role of Prospective Economic Evaluations.” American Politics Quarterly 17:291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, James G. 1990. “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests.” University of California, San Diego. Typescript.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B. 1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 27:165–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83:1125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1991. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham H. 1970. Motivation and Personality. 2d ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” American Political Science Review 64:18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 1975. “The Political Business Cycle.” Review of Economic Studies 42:169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut, and Yantek, Thomas. 1983. “Macroeconomic Conditions and the Fluctuations of Presidential Popularity: The Question of Lagged Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 27:785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., and Smith, Renée M.. 1990. “Cointegration and Error Correction in Multiple Time Series Analysis: Presidential Approval and the Quality-of-Life Equilibrium Hypothesis.” Presented at the Political Methodology Summer Conference, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., and Smith, Renee M.. N.d. “Error Correction, Attitude Persistence, and Executive Rewards and Punishments: A Behavioral Theory of Presidential Approval.” Political Analysis. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., 1986. The Cycles of American History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Conforto, Bruce M.. 1980. “Presidential Performance, the Economy, and the Public's Evaluation of Economic Conditions.” Journal of Politics 42:49–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirgy, M. Joseph. 1986. “A Quality-of-Life Theory Derived from Maslow's Developmental Perspective: Quality Is Related to a Progressive Satisfaction of Needs, Lower Order and Higher.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 45:329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1991a. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1991b. “Dynamic Representation.” University of Iowa. Typescript.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R., and Zuk, G.. 1983. “American Elections and the International Electoral-Economic Cycle: A Test of the Tufte Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 27:464–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, John T. 1990. “The Political Manipulation of Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review 84:767–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.