No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
1 Acts 1917, p. 377.
2 Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming.
3 Acts 1917, p. 536.
4 Acts 1917, p. 1280.
5 Acts 1917, p. 2552.
6 Acts 1917, p. 236.
7 Acts 1917, p. 513.
8 Acts 1917, p. 200.
9 Acts 1917, p. 236.
10 Acts 1918, p. 19.
11 Acts 1917, p. 179.
12 Acts 1917, p. 377.
13 Acts Special Session 1917, p. 22.
14 Acts 1917, p. 559.
15 Acts 1917, p. 24.
16 Acts 1917, p. 139.
17 Acts 1917, p. 579.
18 Acts 1917, p. 245.
19 Acts 1917, p. 308.
20 Acts 1917, p. 814.
21 The General Assembly of Louisiana in 1916 anticipated the passage of the Smith-Hughes Act and by Act of July 6, 1916, authorized the governor to accept it in event of its passage. Information as to the situation in Rhode Island and North Carolina is not available.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.