Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:48:15.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rousseau's Moral Realism: Replacing Natural Law with the General Will

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Arthur M. Melzer
Arthur M. Melzer*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Social Contract is reinterpreted by emphasizing its relation to Rousseau's other writings and doctrines. In the spirit of Hobbesian realism, Rousseau regards natural law and other forms of “private morality” as ineffectual, invalid, and in practice dangerous tools of oppression and subversion. But, still more realistic than Hobbes, Rousseau thinks it impossible to build a nonoppressive state on men's selfish interests alone and embraces the classical view that morality or virtue is politically necessary (as well as intrinsically good). Rousseau's doctrine of the natural goodness of man, however, which traces all vice to the effects of oppression, leads him to conclude that the non-oppression more or less guaranteed by the absolute rule of general laws is also sufficient to make men virtuous. Thus Rousseau can declare law as such (General Will) infallible and “sovereign”—and he must do so in order to protect rule of law from its greatest danger, the subversive appeal to “natural law.”

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 633 - 651
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burlamaqui, J.-J. Principes du droit naturel. Paris: Guillaume Junior, 1791.Google Scholar
Cobban, A. Rousseau and the modern state. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1934.Google Scholar
Crocker, L. The priority of justice or law. Yale French Studies, 1961–1962, 28, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derathé, R. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France, 1950.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. et al. [Encyclopedia] (Hoyt, N. S. & Cassirer, T., Trans.) Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1965.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. Anthropologie et politique. Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar
Gough, J. W. The social contract. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Grotius, H. [The law of war and peace] (Kelsey, F., Trans.) Oxford: Clarenton Press, 1925.Google Scholar
Hall, J. C. Rousseau: an introduction to his political philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haymann, F. La loi naturelle dans la philosophie de J.-J. Rousseau. Annales, 1943–1945, 30, 65–109.Google Scholar
Hendel, C. W. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: moralist. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1934.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. Leviathan. New York: Collier Books, 1962.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. De Cive. In Man and citizen. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Hubert, R. Rousseau et l'encyclopédie Paris: Gamber, 1928.Google Scholar
Jouvenal, B. de Essai sur la politique de Rousseau. In Rousseau, J.-J., Du contrat social. Geneva: Éditions du Cheval Ailé, 1947.Google Scholar
Keohane, N. O. Philosophy and the state in France: the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, R. The political philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Planner, M. F. Rousseau's state of nature. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. von [Le droit de la nature et des gens] (Barbeyrac, Jean, Trans.) Amsterdam: Pierre de Coup, 1712.Google Scholar
Rommen, H. A. The natural law: a study in legal and social history and philosophy. St. Louis: Herder, 1947.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Oeuvres complètes. Gagnebin, B. & Raymond, M. (Eds.). Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1959–1969. (Cited as Works.)Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. [Letter to M. d'Alembert]. In Bloom, A. (Trans.), Politics and the arts. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. [The first and second discourses] (Masters, R. D. & Masters, J. R., Trans.) New York: St. Martin's Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. [On the social contract, with Geneva manuscript and political economy] (Masters, R. D., Ed. & Masters, J. R., Trans.) New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. [Emile or on education] (Bloom, A., Trans.) New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Shklar, J. N. Men and citizens: a study of Rousseau's social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. Natural right and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Vaughan, C. E. The political writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1915.Google Scholar
Vaughan, C. E. Studies in the history of political philosophy before and after Rousseau. Manchester: University Press, 1925.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.