Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:49:24.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Bradley C. Canon  and
Lawrence Baum
Bradley C. Canon
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Lawrence Baum
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social scientists have given increasing attention to the diffusion of policy innovations among the American states, focusing on the legislative and administrative sectors. This study is an effort to expand our understanding of policy diffusion by analyzing the diffusion of 23 innovative tort doctrines among state court systems between 1876 and 1975. This analysis examines the innovativeness of state judicial systems, the correlates of innovativeness, and the pattern of diffusion. The findings suggest that the diffusion of judicial doctrines is a very different process from the diffusion of legislation. A major reason for the difference appears to be the courts' dependence on litigants to provide opportunities for innovation.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 975 - 987
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, Michael, and Alford, Robert R. (1970). “Community Structure and Innovation: The Case of Public Housing.” American Political Science Review 64: 843–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Jaros, Dean (1970). “External Variables, Institutional Structure and Dissent on State Supreme Courts.” Polity 3: 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Jaros, Dean (1979). “The Impact of Changes in Judicial Doctrine: The Abrogation of Charitable Immunity.” Law & Society Review 13: 969–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downs, George W. Jr., and Mohr, Lawrence B. (1979). “Toward a Theory of Innovation.” Administration and Society 10: 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. (1972). American Federalism: A View from the States, 2nd ed. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Eyestone, Robert (1977). “Confusion, Diffusion and Innovation.” American Political Science Review 71: 441–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, Irwin, and Menzel, Donald C. (1977). “Diffusion Milieus as a Focus of Research on Innovation in the Public Sector.” Policy Sciences 8: 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, John L. (1978). “Regionalism and Innovation in the American States.” Journal of Politics 40: 179–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. (1973). A History of American Law. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., and Ladinsky, Jack (1967). “Social Change and the Law of Industrial Accidents.” Columbia Law Review 67: 50–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry R. (1981). “Innovation in State Judicial Administration: Effects on Court Management and Organization.” American Politics Quarterly 9: 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Vines, Kenneth N. (1973). State Court Systems. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia (1973). “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science Review 67: 1174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Peter (1979). “Some Predictors of the Interstate Diffusion of State Common Law, 1870-1970.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hofferbert, Richard J. (1968). “Socio-economic Dimensions of the American States: 1890-1960.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 12: 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, James Willard (1950). The Growth of American Law: The Law Makers. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Jaros, Dean, and Canon, Bradley C. (1971). “Dissent on State Supreme Courts: The Differential Significance of Characteristics of Judges.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15: 322–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Charles A. (1976). “Political Culture in American States: Elazar's Formulation Examined.” American Journal of Political Science 20: 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeton, Robert E. (1969). Venturing to Do Justice: Reforming Private Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingman, David (1980). “Temporal and Spatial Diffusion in the Comparative Analysis of Social Change.” American Political Science Review 74: 123–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, Donald C., and Feller, Irwin (1977). “Leadership and Interaction Patterns in the Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States.” Western Political Quarterly 30: 528–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Stuart S. (1961). “Political Party Affiliation and Judges' Decisions.” American Political Science Review 55: 843–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, William L. (1960). “The Assault Upon the Citadel (Strict Liability to the Consumer).” Yale Law Journal 69: 1099–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, William L. (1966). “The Fall of the Citadel (Strict Liability to the Consumer).” Minnesota Law Review 50: 791–848.Google Scholar
Prosser, William L., and Wade, John W. (1971). Cases and Materials on Torts, 5th ed. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M., with Shoemaker, F. Floyd (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, H. Ted (1976). The Courts: Fulcrum of the Justice System. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Goodyear.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira (1969). “The Utility of Elazar's Political Culture: A Research Note.” Polity 2: 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, S. Sidney (1962). “The Political Party Variable in the Michigan Supreme Court.” Journal of Public Law 11: 352–62.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. (1969). “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63: 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Thompson, Kay (1980). “The Impact of Federal Incentives on State Policy Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 715–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, Glenn R., and Allard, Robert E. (1965). “Judicial Selection and Tenure in the United States.” In Jones, Harry W. (ed.), The Courts, the Public, and the Law Explosion. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 146–77.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.