Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:19:25.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Lawrence Baum
Lawrence Baum*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measuring the U.S. Supreme Court's policy changes is complicated by change in the content of the cases that come before the Court. I adapt from earlier scholarship a method to correct for changes in case content and use this method to measure change in the Court's support for civil liberties in the 1946–85 terms. Analysis based on this method indicates that because of changes in case content, the average difficulty of reaching a pro-civil liberties result varied during that period. With corrections for case difficulty, the Warren Court of the 1950s appears to have been more conservative, and the Burger Court more liberal, than patterns of case outcomes themselves suggest. This method, while imperfect, has utility for the measurement of policy change in the Supreme Court and other institutions and thus can serve as a building block in analyses of the processes and determinants of change.

Type
Research Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 905 - 920
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsden, A. H. 1985. The State and Taiwan's Economic Development. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, Theda. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Richard E. and Whyte, Martin K.. 1982. Dependency Theory and Taiwan: Analysis of a Deviant Case. American Journal of Sociology 87:1064–89.Google Scholar
Benoit, Emile. 1973. Defense and Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Chan, Steve. 1985. The Impact of Defense Spending on Economic Performance: A Survey of Evidence and Problems. Orbis 29:403–34.Google Scholar
Chan, Steve. 1987. The Mouse That Roared: Taiwan's Management of Trade Relations with the U.S. Comparative Political Studies 20:251–92.Google Scholar
Chan, Steve, n.d. Developing Strength from Weakness: The State in Taiwan. Journal of Developing Societies. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Clark, C. 1987. The Taiwan Exception: Implications for Contending Political Economy Paradigms. International Studies Quarterly 31:327–56.Google Scholar
Council for Economic Planning and Development. 1986. Taiwan Statistical Data Book. Taipei: author.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. 1984. The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sector, Product Cycle, and Political Consequences. International Organization 38:1–40.Google Scholar
Deger, S. and Smith, R.. 1983. Military Expenditure and Growth in Less Developed Countries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 27:335–53.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Neil H. 1966. U.S. Aid to Taiwan: A Study of Foreign Aid, Self-Help, and Development. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rothschild, K. W. 1973. Military Expenditure, Exports, and Growth. Kyklos 26:804–14.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1970. What Price Vigilance? The Burdens of National Defense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yoffie, David B. 1983. Power and Protectionism: Strategies of Newly Industrializing Countries. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.