Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:47:03.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macropartisanship: An Empirical Reassessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Paul R. Abramson  and
Charles W. Ostrom Jr.
Paul R. Abramson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Charles W. Ostrom Jr.
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To evaluate the comparability of the Gallup and Michigan Survey Research Center measures for studying levels of partisanship among the U.S. electorate we compare the overtime distribution of partisanship and the correlates of partisanship using the results of Gallup surveys, the National Election Studies, and the General Social Surveys. Compared with the Gallup results, both the other two surveys reveal less short-term variation and also less total variation. Compared with the Gallup results, the National Election Studies partisanship results are less related to short-term electoral outcomes and do not appear to be strongly driven by short-term economic and political evaluations. Our analyses suggest that scholars should be cautious about using Gallup results to revise conclusions based upon analyses that employ the Michigan Survey Research Center party identification measure.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 181 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1990. Change and Continuity in the 1988 Elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Allsop, Dee, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1988. “Measuring Change in Party Identification in an Election Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science 32:996–1017.Google Scholar
Borrelli, Stephen, Lockerbie, Brad, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1987. “Why the Democrat-Republican Partisanship Gap Varies from Poll to Poll.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51:115–19.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Rothenberg, Lawrence S.. 1988. “The Instability of Partisanship: An Analysis of the 1980 Presidential Election.” British Journal of Political Science 18:445–65.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1985. Congressional Quarterly's Guide tb U.S. Elections. 2d ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort-Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Pierce, Roy. 1985. “Measuring Partisanship.” Political Methodology 11:143–66.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Norval D., and Frisbie, W. Parker. 1977. “Trend Studies with Survey Sample and Census Data.” In Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 3, ed. Inkeles, Alex. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Keith, Bruce E., Magleby, David B., Nelson, Candice J., Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark C., and Wolfinger, Raymond E.. 1986. “The Partisan Affinities of Independent ‘Leaners’.” British Journal of Political Science 16:155–85.Google Scholar
Lockerbie, Brad. 1989. “Change in Party Identification: The Role of Prospective Economic Evaluations.” American Politics Quarterly 17:291–311.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83:1125–42.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J.. 1990. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1989–1990. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., 1990. Time Series Analysis: Regression Techniques. 2d ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr.,, and Simon, Dennis M.. 1985. “Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 79:334–58.Google Scholar
Scammon, Richard M., and McGillivray, Alice V., eds. 1989. America Votes 18: A Handbook of Contemporary American Election Statistics. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Rev. ed. Washington: Brookings.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.