Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:49:51.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Joseph Cooper  and
David W. Brady
Joseph Cooper
Affiliation:
Rice University
David W. Brady
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article deals with the transition in House leadership from Cannon to Rayburn. The transition involved moving from a hierarchical pattern of leadership to a bargaining pattern. In accounting for this transition, we argue that it is the institutional context of the House that determines leadership power and style. Moreover, we argue that there is no straightforward relationship between leadership style and effectiveness; rather, style and effectiveness are contingent or situational. We conclude that the impact of institutional context on leadership behavior is itself primarily determined by party strength. When party strength is high, power is concentrated and leaders are task- or goal-oriented, whereas when party strength is low, power is dispersed and leaders will be oriented to bargaining and maintaining relationships.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 411 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abram, Michael, and Joseph, Cooper (1968). “The Rise of Seniority in the House of Representatives.” Polity 1: 52–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David (1973). Congressional Voting in a Partison Era. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David, and Phillip, Althoff (1974). “Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1890-1910: Elements of a Responsible Party System.” Journal of Politics 36: 753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, Joseph, Cooper, and Patricia, Hurley (1979). “The Decline of Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4: 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, and Charles, Bullock (1980). “Is There a Conservative Coalition in the House?” Journal of Politics 42: 549–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolling, Richard (1965). House Out of Order. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Brown, George R. (1922). The Leadership of Congress. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Busby, L. White (1927). Uncle Joe Cannon. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Chiu, Chang-Wei (1928). The Speaker of the House of Representatives Since 1896. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, Charles (1963). The Congressman: His Work as He Sees It. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph (1961). Congress and Its Committees. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and Gary, Bombardier (1968). “Presidential Leadership and Party Success.” Journal of Politics 30: 1012–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Joseph (1970). The Origins of Standing Committees and the Development of the Modern House. Houston: Rice University Publications.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph (1975). “Strengthening the Congress: An Organizational Analysis.” Harvard Journal of Legislation 12: 307–68.Google Scholar
Daniels, Jonathan (1946). Frontier on the Potomac. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard (1962). “The House Appropriations Committee as a Political System: The Problem of Integration.” American Political Science Review 56: 310–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, George (1961). History of the House of Representatives. New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar
Gross, Bertram (1953). The Legislative Struggle: A Study in Social Combat. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Haines, Lynn (1915). Your Congress. Washington, D.C.: National Voters' League.Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, Paul D. (1927). Party Government in the House of Representatives. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hechler, Kenneth (1940). Insurgency. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Pendleton (1940). Presidential Leadership. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.Google Scholar
Hinckley, Barbara (1970). “Congressional Leadership Selection and Support: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Politics 32: 268–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, Asher C. (1907). Hinds Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States, Vol. 4. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Huitt, Ralph K., and Robert L., Peabody (1969). Congress: Two Decades of Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (1968). “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 30: 617–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (1970). The Minority Party in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kefauver, Estes (1947). A Twentieth Century Congress. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.Google Scholar
Ladd, E. C., and Hadley, C. P. (1975). Transformations of the American Party System. New York: William Norton.Google Scholar
Luce, Robert (1922). Legislative Procedure. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
MacNeil, Neil (1963). Forge of Democracy. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Manley, John F. (1969). “Wilbur D. Mills: A Study in Congressional Leadership.” American Political Science Review 63: 442–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, John F. (1977). “The Conservative Coalition in Congress.” In Dodd, Larry and Oppenheimer, Bruce (eds.), Congress Reconsidered. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. (1966). Party Loyalty Among Congressmen. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner, John B. (1980). Theories of Organizational Behavior. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Garrison (1977). “Partisan Patterns of House Leadership Change 1789-1977.” American Political Science Review 71: 918–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. (1976). Leadership in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. (1969). “Two Strategies of Influence: Choosing a Majority Leader, 1962.” In Polsby, Nelson W. and Peabody, Robert (eds.), New Perspectives on the House of Representatives. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W., Gallagher, M., and Barry, Rundquist (1969). “The Growth of Seniority in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 63: 787–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. (1967). Party Leaders in the House of Representatives. Washington: Brookings.Google Scholar
Robinson, William A. (1930). Thomas B. Reed: Parliamentarian. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara (1978). “From Party Voting to Regional Fragmentation: The House of Representatives, 1933-1956.” American Politics Quarterly 6: 125–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Alfred (1975). Sam Rayburn. New York: Hawthorn Books.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James (1973). Dynamics of the Party System. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
Truman, David (1959). The Congressional Party. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow (1961). Constitutional Government in the United Slates. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Roland (1943). This Is Congress. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Young, Roland (1956). Congressional Politics in the Second World War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wicker, Tom (1968). JFK and LBJ. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.