Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:39:46.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incumbency, Electoral Safety, and Turnover in the House of Representatives, 1952–76

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Melissa P. Collie
Melissa P. Collie*
Affiliation:
Rice University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two hypotheses have received a great deal of attention from students of congressional elections. First, many analysts have concluded that an increase in the electoral value attached to incumbency accounts for the rise in incumbents' victory margins observed since the mid-sixties. Second, many scholars have attributed the decline in electoral turnover to the percentage increase in victory margins. Analyzing the electoral histories of 13 House cohorts (1952-76), this study reexamines these two hypotheses within the framework of a quasi-experimental design. The results presented here, in contrast to those of previous studies, cast doubt on the increased incumbency effect. Moreover, little relationship is found between an increase in electoral safety, as reflected by increased victory margins, and a decline in electoral turnover.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , March 1981 , pp. 119 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. (1980). “A Comparison of Voting for U.S. Senator and Representative in 1978.” American Political Science Review 74: 633–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Duncan (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Born, Richard (1979). “Generational Replacement and the Growth of Incumbent Reelection Margins in the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 73: 811–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean (1974). Communication. American Political Science Review 68: 212.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean (1975a). “Insulation and Responsiveness in Congressional Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 90: 411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean (1975b). “American Politics in the 1970's.” In Burnham, Walter Dean and Chambers, William Nisbet (eds.), The American Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Cover, Albert (1977). “One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 21: 523–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Albert, and Mayhew, David (1977). “Congressional Dynamics and the Decline of Competitive Congressional Elections.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I. (eds.). Congress Reconsidered. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert (1971). “The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” Polity 3: 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert (1972). “Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 66: 1234–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert (1976). “Is There Such a Thing as a Safe Seat?” Polity 8: 623–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr., (1978). Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John A. (1977). “On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 71: 166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. (1977a). “The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It.” American Political Science Review 71: 177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. (1977b). Congress: Keystone to the Washington Establishment. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hinckley, Barbara (1980). “The American Voter in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 74: 641–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. (1978). “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 72: 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. (1980). “Candidates, Campaigns, and Contexts in Congressional Elections.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. (1978). Unsafe at Any Margin. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1980). “Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 74: 617–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David (1974). “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6: 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Candice J. (1978–1979). “The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections, 1964–74.” Political Science Quarterly 93: 665–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, James L. (1979). “The Personal Electoral Advantage of House Incumbents, 1963–74.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Gatlinburg, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. (1973). “The Relationship Between Seats and Votes in Two Party Systems.” American Political Science Review 67: 540–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. (1974). Communication. American Political Science Review 68: 211–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. (1975). “Determinants of the Outcome of Midterm Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 69: 812–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.