Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dlb68 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-17T02:31:11.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Holmes-Laski Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Harold J. Laski, 1916–1935. Vols. I and II. Edited by Mark DeWolfe Howe. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1953. Pp. xvi, 1650. $12.50.)

Review products

Holmes-Laski Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Harold J. Laski, 1916–1935. Vols. I and II. Edited by Mark DeWolfe Howe. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1953. Pp. xvi, 1650. $12.50.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

George Catlin
George Catlin
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews of Books
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , September 1953 , pp. 858 - 862
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In December, 1921 Laski claimed, in a letter to Holmes (Vol. 1, p. 386) that he had been seeing Winston Churchill once a week for a month for as long as one and a half hours, in personal argument, and that he had submitted a formula for settlement of the Irish question, which was in the end almost verbally accepted. On May 13, 1953, this reviewer received a written message from Sir Winston Churchill that he “does not remember ever having heard of him [Laski] in connection with the Irish settlement of 1921.” A check of certain academic references produces not dissimilar results.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.