Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-llmch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:00:20.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Daron R. Shaw
Daron R. Shaw*
Affiliation:
University of Texasat Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although presidential campaigns have been mythologized in literature and cinema, most theories of elections relegate them to a secondary role, presuming they have little effect on outcomes. Direct tests of campaigning's influence on electoral college votes are rare, mostly because statewide data on the allocation of resources and voters' preferences have been hard to obtain. Many studies suggest a minimal effect, but it is possible that a more significant influence might be found with better data on the key dependent and independent variables. This study uses data on presidential candidates' appearances and television advertising purchases to conduct cross-sectional and pooled time-series analyses of their influence on statewide outcomes in 1988, 1992, and 1996. The data demonstrate that, despite the conditioning influence of other factors, campaigning affected statewide preferences as well as the electoral college vote.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 345 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1996. Going Negative. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Herbert. 1991. Polling and the Public. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1992. “Electioneering in the United States.” In Electioneering: A Comparative Study of Continuity and Change, ed. Butler, David and Ranney, Austin. Oxford: Clarendon. Pp. 244–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1993. “Messages Delivered: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review 87 (June: 267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1997. “How Campaigns Matter.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Committee on Campaign Reform, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 89 (September: 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney. 1982. The Permanent Campaign. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Pp. 206–61.Google Scholar
Fair, Ray C. 1996. “Econometrics and Presidential Elections.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (3): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1993. “Re-examining ‘Minimal Effects’ Models in Recent Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 55 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Geer, John G.. 1998. “A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 573–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles H. 1991. “Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 85 (December: 1193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles H. 1997. “The Long Campaigns of George Bush and Bill Clinton: Electoral Politics Between Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Geer, John G., and Lau, Richard. 1998. “The Effects of Negative Campaigning on Turnout and Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 409–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germond, Jack W., and Witcover, Jules. 1985. Wake Us When It's Over. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Germond, Jack W., and Witcover, Jules. 1989. Whose Broad Stripes and Bright Stars? The Trivial Pursuit of the Presidency, 1988. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Germond, Jack W., and Witcover, Jules. 1993. Mad as Hell: Revolt at the Ballot Box, 1992. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Goldman, Peter, DeFrank, Thomas M., Miller, Mark, Murr, Andrew, and Mathews, Thomas. 1989. Quest for the Presidency, 1988. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Goldman, Peter, DeFrank, Thomas M., Miller, Mark, Murr, Andrew, and Mathews, Thomas. 1994. Quest for the Presidency, 1992. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Kenneth. 1997. “Political Advertising and Persuasion in the 1996 Campaign.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1989. “National Party Decision-Making, Strategies, and Resource Distribution in Congressional Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 42 (3): 334–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1995. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1994. “Campaigns, National Conditions, and U.S. Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 973–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, Carl. 1949. Experiments on Mass Communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hovland, Carl. 1953. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 1996. “The Case of the Vanishing Footprints: A Review of the Research on Political Campaigns.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Petrocik, John R.. 1998. “‘Basic Rule’ Voting: The Impact of Campaigns on Party and Approval-Based Voting.” Paper presented at the Conference on Political Advertising in Election Campaigns, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83 (September: 773–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 334–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, John. 1984. Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr. 1983. Interpreting Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1995. “The Miserly Voter: Heuristics and ‘Rational’ Voting Behavior.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Luskin, Robert C. N.d. “Political Psychology, Political Behavior, and Politics: Questions of Aggregation, Causal Distance, and Taste.” In Thinking about Political Psychology, ed. Kuklinski, James H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory. 1992. “The Influence of Personal and National Conditions on Presidential Voting, 1956–88.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 829–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matalin, Mary, Carville, James, and Knobler, Peter. 1994. All's Fair: Love, War, and Running for President. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Morris, Dick. 1997. Behind the Oval Office: Winning the Presidency in the ‘90’s. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1981. Party Coalitions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1997. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Vincent, and Zaller, John. 1993. “Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (2): 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, Edward. 1996. Bare-Knuckles and Back-Rooms. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayrs, Louis. 1989. Pooled Time Series Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James. 1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward J. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin, and Brians, Craig Leonard. 1996. “Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 172–94.Google Scholar
White, Theodore. 1961. The Making of the President. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob. 1996. The Choice. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1991. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.