Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:49:23.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cold Case File: Indictable Acts and Officer Accountability in Marbury v. Madison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

KAREN ORREN  and
CHRISTOPHER WALKER
KAREN ORREN*
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
CHRISTOPHER WALKER*
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
*
Professor Karen Orren, University of California at Los Angeles ([email protected]).
Christopher Walker, University of California at Los Angeles ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Starting from the position that officer accountability is a core value of American constitutionalism, this article reassesses Marbury v. Madison in light of the indictable acts connected to the nondelivery of Marbury's commission. First, it reads Chief Justice Marshall's opinion against the background of personal and political hostility among the principals, including between Marbury and President Jefferson. Second, it identifies avenues of further redress open to Marbury before and after the Supreme Court's refusal of the mandamus order, and it considers why they were not pursued. Finally, having identified alternative procedural traditions on which Marshall could have drawn, and reviewed decisions by state and federal judges in analogous suits against officers, it concludes that Marbury's deepest contribution was to elevate the principle of jurisdiction over the imperative of remedy in constitutional decision making.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 241 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, Bruce. 2005. The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of Presidential Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. 1989. “Marbury, Section 13, and the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.” University of Chicago Law Review 56: 443–99.Google Scholar
Appleby, Joyce. 2003. Thomas Jefferson. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Barnes, Thomas G. 1961. “Star Chamber Mythology.” American Journal of Legal History 5: 1–11.Google Scholar
Bestor, Arthur. 1961. “State Sovereignty and Slavery: A Reinterpretation of Proslavery Constitutional Doctrine, 1846–1860.” Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society 54: 117–80.Google Scholar
Beveridge, Albert Jeremiah. 1916. The Life of John Marshall: Politician, Diplomatist, Statesman, 1789–1801. Vol. 2 of The Life of John Marshall. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Beveridge, Albert Jeremiah. 1919. The Life of John Marshall: Conflict and Construction, 1800–1815. Vol. 3 of The Life of John Marshall. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bishop, Joel Prentiss. 1882. Commentaries on the Criminal Law. Vol. 1. 7th ed. Boston: Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. [1768] 1979. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Vol. 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Susan Low. 1989. “The Early Role of the Attorney General in Our Constitutional Scheme: In the Beginning There Was Pragmatism.” Duke Law Journal 561–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Susan Low. 2001. “The Marbury Mystery: Why Did Marbury Sue in the Supreme Court?” Constitutional Commentary 18: 607–27.Google Scholar
Bloch, Susan Low, and Marcus, Maeva. 1986. “John Marshall's Selective Use of History in Marbury v. Madison .” Wisconsin Law Review 301–37.Google Scholar
Bowers, Claude G. 1936. Jefferson in Power: The Death Struggles of the Federalists. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.Google Scholar
Brant, Irving. 1952. “James Madison and His Times.” American Historical Review 57: 553–70.Google Scholar
Brookhiser, Richard. 2011. James Madison. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bundy, Charles S. 1902. “A History of the Office of Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia.” Records of the Columbia Historical Society, Washington D.C., vol. 5, pp. 259–293.Google Scholar
Cameron, Florence Francis. 1985. “Defamation, Survivability, and the Demise of the Antiquated ‘Acto Personalis’ Doctrine.’” Columbia Law Review 85: 1833–51.Google Scholar
Carpenter, William S. 1915. “The Repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801.” American Political Science Review 9: 519–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitwood, Oliver Perry. 1905. Justice in Virginia. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Thomas M. 1898. The General Principles of Constitutional Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. 1914. “ Marbury v. Madison and the Doctrine of Judicial Review.” University of Michigan Law Review 12: 538–72.Google Scholar
Crompton, Richard. [1630 or 1641] 1881. Star Chamber Cases, Showing What Cases Properly Belong to the Cognizance of That Court. Boston: Soule and Bugbee.Google Scholar
Dane, Perry. 1994. “Jurisdictionality, Time, and the Legal Imagination.” Hofstra Law Review 23: 1–135.Google Scholar
Ford, Paul Leicester. 1904. The Works of Thomas Jefferson. 12 vols. Vol. 4. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Forte, David F. 1996. “Marbury's Travail: Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment as Justice of the Peace.” Catholic University Law Review 45: 349–402.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix, and Landis, James M.. 1925. “The Business of the Supreme Court of the United States: A Study in the Federal Judicial System.” Harvard Law Review 38: 1005–59.Google Scholar
Gay, Sidney Howard. 1898. James Madison. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goebel, Julius. 1971. Antecedents and Beginnings to 1801. Vol. I of The Oliver Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goodman, Leonard S. 1957. “Mandamus in the Colonies—The Rise of the Superintending Power of American Courts.” American Journal of Legal History 1: 308–35.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1995. “The Passive-Aggressive Virtues: Cohens v. Virginia and the Problematic Establishment of Judicial Power.” Constitutional Commentary 12: 67–92.Google Scholar
Gray, Charles M. 1994. The Writ of Prohibition: Jurisdiction in Early Modern English Law. Vol. 1. New York: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip J. 2008. Law and Judicial Duty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haskins, George Lee. 1981. Foundations of Power: John Marshall 1801–15, Pt. 1. of Vol. 2 of The Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Henderson, Edith G. 1963. Foundations of English Administrative Law. Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein.Google Scholar
Hoar, Samuel Jr. 1984. “Unraveling the Pendent Party Controversy: A Revisionist Approach to Pendent and Ancillary Jurisdiction.” Boston University Law Review 64: 895–947.Google Scholar
Hoffer, Peter C. and Hull, N. E. H.. 1978. “The First American Impeachments.” William and Mary Quarterly 35: 653–67.Google Scholar
Howe, John R. 1967. “Republican Thought and the Political Violence of the 1790s.” American Quarterly 19: 147–65.Google Scholar
Jacob, Giles. [1729] 1797. The Law-Dictionary: Explaining the Rise, Progress, and Present State, of the English Law, in Theory and Practice; Defining and Interpreting the Terms or Words of Art; and Comprising Copious Information, Historical, Political, and Commercial, on the Subjects of Our Law, Trade, and Government. London: T. Longman.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Louis L. 1958. “The Right to Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 71: 401–37.Google Scholar
Jay, Stewart. 1985. “Origins of Federal Common Law: Part Two.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 133: 1231–333.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. N.d. “Public Papers, 1743–1826.” Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1904–05. The Works of Thomas Jefferson, Federal Edition. Vol. 12. Letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823.Google Scholar
Kessler, Amalia D. 2005. “Our Inquisitorial Tradition: Equity Procedure, Due Process, and the Search for an Alternative to the Adversarial.” Cornell Law Review 90: 1181–275.Google Scholar
Ketcham, Ralph. 1971. James Madison: A Biography. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2004 The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. Oxford University Press: NY.Google Scholar
Leadam, I. S. [1902] 2009. Select Cases before the King's Council in the Star Chamber. Selden Society. Delhi: Pranava Books.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 2003. “Why I Do Not Teach Marbury (Except to Eastern Europeans) and Why You Shouldn't Either.” Wake Forest Law Review 38: 553–78.Google Scholar
Malone, Dumas. 1962. Jefferson and the Ordeal of Liberty. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Malone, Dumas. 1967. “Mr. Jefferson and the Traditions of Virginia.” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 75: 131–42.Google Scholar
Malone, Dumas. 1970. Jefferson the President: First Term, 1801–1805 Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Marvick, Elizabeth. 2005. “Washington, Jefferson, Madison: Family Experience and Personality in the Politics of Three Virginian Founding Fathers.” Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry M. 2007. “Reluctant Nationalists: Federal Administration and Administrative Law in the Republican Era, 1801–1829.” Yale Law Journal 116: 1636–1740.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. 1960. The American Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. 2009. “The Story of Marbury v. Madison: Making Defeat Look like Victory,” In Constitutional Law Stories, ed. Dorf, Michael C.. New York: Thomson Reuters/Foundation Press, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
McDonald, Forrest. 1994. The American Presidency: An Intellectual History. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Melton, Buckner F. Jr. 1993. “Federal Impeachment and Criminal Procedure: The Framers’ Intent.” Maryland Law Review 52: 437–57.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2004. “ Marbury v. Madison as the First Great Administrative Law Decision.” John Marshall Law Review 37: 481–522.Google Scholar
Monaghan, Henry P. 1983. “Marbury and the Administrative State.” Columbia Law Review 83: 1–34.Google Scholar
Newmyer, R. Kent. 2001. John Marshall an the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Press.Google Scholar
O'Fallon, James M. 1992. “Marbury.” Stanford Law Review 44: 219–60.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen. 1994. “The Work of Government: Recovering the Discourse of Office in Marbury v. Madison .” Studies in American Political Development 8: 60–80.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen. 1998. “A War between Officers: The Enforcement of Slavery Law in the Northern United States, and of the Republic for Which It Stands, Before the Civil War.” Studies in American Political Development 12: 343–82.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen. 2000. “Officers’ Rights: Toward a Unified Field Theory of American Constitutional Development.” Law & Society Review, 34: 873–909.Google Scholar
Perlin, Adam A. 2010. “The Impeachment of Samuel Chase: Redefining Judicial Independence.” Rutgers Law Review 62: 725–89.Google Scholar
Pfander, James E. 2001. “Marbury, Original Jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court's Supervisory Power.” Columbia Law Review 101: 1515–612.Google Scholar
Pfander, James E. 2004. “Article I Tribunals, Article III Courts, and the Judicial Power of the United States.” Harvard Law Review 118: 643–776.Google Scholar
Pious, Richard M. 1999. “Impeaching the President: The Intersection between Constitutional and Popular Law.” St. Louis University Law Journal 43: 859–904.Google Scholar
Pollak, Louis H. 2004. “What Did John Marshall Decide and Why?” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 148: 1–13.Google Scholar
Prakash, Saikrishna, and Smith, Steven D.. 2006. “How to Remove a Federal Judge.” Yale Law Journal 116: 72–137.Google Scholar
Presser, Stephen B. 2009. “Samuel Chase: In Defense of the Rule of Law and against the Jeffersonians.” Vanderbilt Law Review 62: 349–70.Google Scholar
Presser, Stephen B. and Becky Bair, Hurley. 1984. “Saving God's Republic: The Jurisprudence of Samuel Chase.” University of Illinois Law Review, pp. 771–822.Google Scholar
Prince, Carl E. 1970. “The Passing of the Aristocracy: Jefferson's Removal of the Federalists, 1801–1805.” Journal of American History 57: 563–75.Google Scholar
Rankin, H. F. 1962. “The General Court of Colonial Virginia: Its Jurisdiction and Personnel.” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 70: 142–53.Google Scholar
Roberts, Clayton. 1956. “The Growth of Ministerial Responsibility to Parliament in Late Stuart England.” Journal of Modern History 28: 215–33.Google Scholar
Roberts, Clayton. 1975. “The Law of Impeachments in Stuart England: A Reply to Raoul Berger.” Yale Law Journal 84: 1419–39.Google Scholar
Rowe, Gary D. 2005. “Constitutionalism in the Streets.” Southern California Law Review 78: 401–56.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Jeffrey K. 1903. “Distrust of the Legal Establishment in Perspective: Maryland During the Early National Years.” Georgia Journal of Southern Legal History 2: 1–40.Google Scholar
Shugerman, Jed Handelsman. 2002. “Marbury and Judicial Deference: The Shadow of Whittington v. Polk and the Maryland Judicial Battle.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 5: 58–108.Google Scholar
Simon, James F. 2002. What Kind of Nation: Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, and the Epic Struggle to Create a United States. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Simon, Maria. 1994. “Bribery and Other Not So ‘Good Behavior’: Criminal Prosecution as a Supplement to Impeachment of Federal Judges.” Columbia Law Review 94: 1617–73.Google Scholar
Singleton, Marvin K. 1968. “New Light on the Chancery Side of Virginia's Evolution to Statehood.” Journal of American Studies 2: 149–60.Google Scholar
Smith, Joseph Henry. 1950. Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations. New York City: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, James Morton. 1954. “Sedition in the Old Dominion: James T. Callender and ‘The Prospect Before Us.’” Journal of Southern History 20: 157–82.Google Scholar
Snowiss, Sylvia. 1987. “From Fundamental Law to the Supreme Law of the Land: A Reinterpretation of the Origin of Judicial Review.” Studies in American Political Development 2: 1–67.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Allen. 1984. “From Private Prosecution to Plea Bargaining: Criminal Prosecution, the District Attorney, and American Legal History.” Crime & Delinquency 30: 568–92.Google Scholar
Story, J. 1809. Commentaries on the Law of Agency. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown.Google Scholar
Surrency, Erwin C. 1967. “Courts in the American Colonies.” American Journal of Legal History 11: 253–76.Google Scholar
Thayer, James B. 1901. John Marshall. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Throop, Montgomery H. 1892. A Treatise on the Law Relating to Public Officers and Sureties in Official Bonds. Chicago: T. H. Flood & Company.Google Scholar
Turner, Kathryn. 1965. “The Midnight Judges.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 109: 494–523.Google Scholar
Van Alstyne, William Scott. 1952. “The District Attorney—A Historical Puzzle.” Wisconsin Law Review 125: 125–38.Google Scholar
Warren, Charles. 1923. The Supreme Court in United States History: 1789–1821. Vol. 1 of The Supreme Court in United States History. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co. Google Scholar
Warren, Charles. 1923–24. “New Light on the History of the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789.” Harvard Law Review 37: 49–132.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Louise. 2003. ‘Our Marbury.’ Virginia Law Review 89: 1235–412.Google Scholar
Woolhandler, Ann. 1987. “Patterns of Official Immunity and Accountability.” 37 Case Western Reserve Law Review 396–483.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.