Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:40:45.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wilson's Failure: Roots of Contention about the Meaning of a Science of Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

PETER N. UBERTACCIO  and
BRIAN J. COOK
PETER N. UBERTACCIO
Affiliation:
Stonehill College
BRIAN J. COOK
Affiliation:
Clark University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Woodrow Wilson sought to establish a new kind of statesmanship for the American regime and a new science of politics. He intended the latter to support the former, so that the practicing politician and the studious academic would not talk past one another. His efforts to redirect the discipline away from a natural science orthodoxy and subdisciplinary fragmentation were largely ignored during his time because he failed to resolve the core disciplinary tension between political science and political power. Efforts similar to Wilson's have resurfaced periodically as a result, generating an ongoing contentiousness about the character of the discipline. We predict that the struggle over such fundamental matters will continue unabated, for that struggle is rooted in the very object of our studies.

Type
“THE EVOLUTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE” ESSAYS
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 100 , Issue 4 , November 2006 , pp. 573 - 578
Copyright
© 2006 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jones Charles O. 1995. “A Way of Life and Law.” American Political Science Review 89 (March): 1– 9.Google Scholar
Link Arthur S., et al. eds. 1966–1994. The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, 69 volumes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lowi Theodore J. 1992. “The State in Political Science: How We Became What We Study.” American Political Science Review 86 (March): 1– 7.Google Scholar
Perestroika. 2005. “The Idea: The Opening of Debate.” In Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sanders Elizabeth. 2005. “Work That Counts.” In Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Seidelman Raymond, with the assistance of Edward J. Harpham. 1985. Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884–1984. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Thorsen Niels Aage. 1988. The Political Thought of Woodrow Wilson 1875–1910. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tulis Jeffrey. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wilson Woodrow. 1890. The State: Elements of Historical and Practical Politics. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.