Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:51:57.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Commentary on the History of Political Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Deborah Baumgold
Deborah Baumgold*
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The phrasing of the title telegraphs the thesis of this essay: study of the history of political theory ought to be understood and approached as a branch of political studies. Prior to the postwar success of empirical political science, the view would have seemed unexceptional. But the need for a defense against the empiricist attack impelled many theorists to turn to theories of interpretation in search of a philosophical and methodological identity. A preoccupation with issues of interpretation now threatens the customary, political study of the tradition. This essay, written in defense of a political understanding of the field, identifies fundamental propositions distinguishing “political commentary” and suggests critical standards appropriate to the enterprise. It also criticizes two currently fashionable applications of interpretative theory to the study of politics, historicist commentary and hermeneutical political science.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 928 - 940
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Perry (1976). Considerations on Western Marxism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1968a). Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1968b). “Truth and Politics.” Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press, pp. 227–64.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1978). Letter to Gerhard [Gershom] Sholem, July 24, 1963. In Feldman, Ron H. (ed.), The Jew as Pariah. New York: Grove Press, pp. 245–51.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. (1977). “Deconstituting Politics: Robert Nozick and Philosophical Reductionism.” Journal of Politics 39: 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. (1978). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Connerton, Paul, ed. (1976). Critical Sociology: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred R., and McCarthy, Thomas A., eds. (1977). Understanding and Social Inquiry. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John (1968). “The Identity of the History of Ideas.” Philosophy 43: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John (1969). The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the ‘Two Treatises of Government.’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul (1978). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchist Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1975). Truth and Method, 2nd ed. Trans, ed. by Barden, Garrett and Cumming, John. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1977). “On the Scope and Function of Hermeneutical Reflection.” Trans, by Hess, G. B. and Palmer, R. E.. In Linge, David E. (ed.), Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 18–43.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. (1979). Political Theory: Tradition and Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1970a). “On Systematically Distorted Communication.” Inquiry 13: 205–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1970b). “Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence.” Inquiry 13: 360–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1977a). “Hannah Arendt's Communications Concept of Power.” Trans, by McCarthy, Thomas. Social Research 44: 3–24.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1977b). “A Review of Gadamer's Truth and Method.” in Dallmayr, Fred R. and McCarthy, Thomas A. (eds.), Understanding and Social Inquiry. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press,. pp. 335–63.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr., (1972). “Three Dimensions of Hermeneutics.” New Literary History 3: 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knauer, James T (1980). “Motive and Goal in Hannah Arendt's Concept of Political Action.” American Political Science Review 74: 721–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Paul F. (1979). “Against Epistemology: Apostate Musings.” Journal of Politics 41: 526–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1964). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGovern, William Montgomery (1941). From Luther to Hitler: The History of Fascist-Nazi Political Philosophy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel (1972). Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plamenatz, John (1967). “The Use of Political Theory.” In Quinton, Anthony (ed.), Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1962). “The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Enquiry.” In Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd Ser. New York: Barnes and Noble, pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1966). “‘The Onely Politician’: Machiavelli, Harrington, and Felix Raab.” Historical Studies: Australia and New Zealand 12: 265–96.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1967). The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1973). Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1980). Review of Political Theory: Tradition and Interpretation by John G. Gunnell. Political Theory 8: 563–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinton, Anthony, ed. (1967). Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1971). “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text.” Social Research 38: 529–62.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1973). “The Task of Hermeneutics.” Trans. by Pellauer, David. Philosophy Today 17: 112–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholem, Gershom (1978). Letter to Hannah Arendt, June 23, 1963. In Feldman, Ron H. (ed.), The Jew as Pariah. New York: Grove Press, pp. 240–45.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1969). “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8: 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1971). “On Performing and Explaining Linguistic Actions.” Philosophical Quarterly 21: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1972a). “Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy.” In Aylmer, G. E. (ed.), The Interregnum: The Quest for Settlement 1646-1660. London: Macmillan, pp. 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1972b). “The Context of Hobbes's Theory of Political Obligation.” In Cranston, Maurice and Peters, Richard S. (eds.), Hobbes and Rousseau: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, Anchor Books, pp. 109–42.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1974). “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action.” Political Theory 2: 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1932–1933). “Quelques Remarques sur la Science Politique de Hobbes: A propos du livre récent de M. Lubienski.” Recherches Philosophiques 2: 609–22.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1963). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Trans, by Sinclair, Elsa M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Phoenix Books.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1965). “Comments on Der Begriff des Politischen by Carl Schmitt.” In Spinoza's Critique of Religion. Trans, by Sinclair, E. M.. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 331–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1971). “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.” Review of Metaphysics 25: 3–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1979). Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinder, Glenn (1976). Tolerance: Toward a New Civility. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. (1969). “Political Theory as a Vocation.” American Political Science Review 63: 1062–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.