Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T05:33:12.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

ALAN S. GERBER ,
GREGORY A. HUBER ,
DAVID DOHERTY ,
CONOR M. DOWLING  and
SHANG E. HA
ALAN S. GERBER*
Affiliation:
Yale University
GREGORY A. HUBER*
Affiliation:
Yale University
DAVID DOHERTY*
Affiliation:
Yale University
CONOR M. DOWLING*
Affiliation:
Yale University
SHANG E. HA*
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
*
Alan S. Gerber is Professor, Department of Political Science and Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, PO Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520-8209 ([email protected]).
Gregory A. Huber is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, PO Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520-8209 ([email protected]).
David Doherty is Postdoctoral Associate, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, PO Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520-8209 ([email protected]).
Conor M. Dowling is Postdoctoral Associate, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, PO Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520-8209 ([email protected]).
Shang E. Ha is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, 3413 James Hall, Brooklyn, NY 11210 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research on personality traits and political attitudes has largely focused on the direct relationships between traits and ideological self-placement. There are theoretical reasons, however, to suspect that the relationships between personality traits and political attitudes (1) vary across issue domains and (2) depend on contextual factors that affect the meaning of political stimuli. In this study, we provide an explicit theoretical framework for formulating hypotheses about these differential effects. We then leverage the power of an unusually large national survey of registered voters to examine how the relationships between Big Five personality traits and political attitudes differ across issue domains and social contexts (as defined by racial groups). We confirm some important previous findings regarding personality and political ideology, find clear evidence that Big Five traits affect economic and social attitudes differently, show that the effect of Big Five traits is often as large as that of education or income in predicting ideology, and demonstrate that the relationships between Big Five traits and ideology vary substantially between white and black respondents.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 111 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswick, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Sanford, Nevitt S.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Akrami, Nazar, and Ekehammar, Bo. 2006. “Right-wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Their roots in Big-Five Personality Factors and Facets.” Journal of Individual Differences 27: 117–26.Google Scholar
Alford, John R., Funk, Carolyn L., and Hibbing, John R.. 2005. “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?” American Political Science Review 99: 153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 2007. “Personal, Interpersonal, and Political Temperaments.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614: 196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, Gordon W., and Odbert, Henry S.. 1936. Trait-Names: A Psycho-Lexical Study. Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Company.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert A. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, Jens B., and van Aken, Marcel A.G.. 2003. “Personality–Relationship Transaction in Adolescence: Core Versus Surface Personality Characteristics.” Journal of Personality 71: 629–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbaranelli, Claudio, Caprara, Gian Vittorio, Vecchione, Michele, and Fraley, Chris R.. 2007. “Voters’ Personality Traits in Presidential Elections.” Personality and Individual Differences 42: 1199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, Daryl J. 1970. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Human Affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Ben-Ner, Avner, Kramera, Amit, and Levy, Ori. 2008. “Economic and Hypothetical Dictator Game Experiments: Incentive Effects at the Individual Level.” Journal of Socio-Economics 37: 1775–84.Google Scholar
Borghans, Lex, Duckworth, Angela Lee, Heckman, James J., and ter Weel, Bas. 2008. “The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits.” Journal of Human Resources 43: 972–1059.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Thomas J. Jr. 1997. “The Genetics of Personality.” In Handbook of Psychiatric Genetics, eds. Blum, Kenneth and Noble, Ernest P.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 273–96.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Thomas J. Jr., and Loehlin, John C.. 2001. “Genes, Evolution, and Personality.” Behavior Genetics 31: 243–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1965. Social Psychology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Caprara, Gian Vittorio, Barbaranelli, Claudio, and Zimbardo, Philip G.. 1999. “Personality Profiles and Political Parties.” Political Psychology 20: 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprara, Gian Vittorio, Schwartz, Shalom, Capanna, Cristina, Vecchione, Michele, and Barbaranelli, Claudio. 2006. “Personality and Politics: Values, Traits, and Political Choice.” Political Psychology 27: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, Dana R., Jost, John T., Gosling, Samuel D., and Potter, Jeff. 2008. “The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind.” Political Psychology 29: 807–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspi, Avshalom, Roberts, Brent W., and Shiner, Rebecca L.. 2005. “Personality Development: Stability and Change.” Annual Review of Psychology 56: 453–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, Raymond B. 1943. “The Description of Personality: Basic Traits Resolved into Clusters.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 38: 476–506.Google Scholar
Christakis, Nicholas A., and Fowler, James H.. 2009. Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature and Origin of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David. New York: Free Press, 206–61.Google Scholar
Costa, Paul T., and McCrae, Robert R.. 1992. NEO PI-R. Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, Paul T., and McCrae, Robert R.. 1993. “Bullish on Personality Psychology.” The Psychologist 6: 302–3.Google Scholar
Dawes, Christopher T., and Fowler, James H.. 2009. “Partisanship, Voting, and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene.” Journal of Politics 71: 1157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 1994. Beyond the Mule: Race and Class in African American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 1997. “African American Political Opinion: Volatility in the Reagan-Bush Era.” In African American Power and Politics, ed. Walton, H. Jr.New York: Columbia University Press, 135–53.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 2001. Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African-American Political Ideologies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Denissen, Jaap J.A., and Penke, Lars. 2008. “Motivational Individual Reaction Norms Underlying the Five-Factor Model of Personality: First Steps Towards a Theory-Based Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Research in Personality 42: 1285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Donald J. 1972. The Political Culture of the United States. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Eaves, Lindon J., and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2008. “Transmission of Attitudes Toward Abortion and Gay Rights: Effects of Genes, Social Learning and Mate Selection.” Behavior Genetics 38: 247–56.Google Scholar
Ekehammar, Bo, and Akrami, Nazar. 2007. “Personality and Prejudice: From Big Five Personality Factors to Facets.” Journal of Personality 75: 899–925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekehammar, Bo, Akrami, Nazar, Gylje, Magnus, and Zakrisson, Ingrid. 2004. “What Matters Most to Prejudice: Big Five Personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right-Wing Authoritarianism?” European Journal of Personality 18: 463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefes and Values.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 416–60.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 2003. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 24: 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Huddy, Leonie. 2005. “Racial Resentment and White Opposition to Race-Conscious Programs: Principles or Prejudice?” American Journal of Political Science 49: 168–83.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Johnston, Christopher. 2009. “Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity.” Stony Brook University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Stenner, Karen. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18: 741–70.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., Baker, Laura A., and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2008. “Genetic Variation in Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 102: 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2008. “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 70: 579–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromm, Erich. 1947. Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich. 1964. The Heart of Man. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine, and Tate, Katherine. 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology 19: 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, and Dowling, Conor M.. 2010a. “Personality and the Strength and Direction of Partisan Attachments.” Yale University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., Raso, Connor, and Ha, Shang E.. 2010b. “Personality Traits and Participation in Political Processes.” Yale University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Renee D., and Friedman, Howard S.. 2006. “Health Status and the Five-Factor Personality Traits in a Nationally Representative Sample.” Journal of Health Psychology 11: 643–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goren, Paul. 2001. “Core Principles and Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics: A Test of Two Theories.” British Journal of Political Science 31: 159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goren, Paul. 2005. “Party Identification and Core Political Values.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 881–96.Google Scholar
Gosling, Samuel D. 2008. Snoop: What Your Stuff Says about You. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gosling, Samuel D. 2009. “A Note on Alpha Reliability and Factor Structure in the TIPI.” December 20. http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/faculty/gosling/tipi_alpha_note.htm (January 5, 2010).Google Scholar
Gosling, Samuel D., Rentfrow, Peter J., and Swann, William B. Jr. 2003. “A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains.” Journal of Research in Personality 37: 504–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, William G., Bruce, Jennifer, Sheese, Brad E., and Tobin, Renee M.. 2007. “Attraction, Personality, and Prejudice: Liking None of the People Most of the Time.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93: 565–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurin, Patricia, Hatchett, Shirley, and Jackson, James S.. 1989. Hope and Independence: Blacks’ Response to Electoral and Party Politics. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Alford, John R., Hibbing, John R., Martin, Nicholas G., and Eaves, Lindon J.. 2009. “Is There a ‘Party’ in Your Genes?”Political Research Quarterly 62: 584–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Medland, Sarah E., Morley, Katherine I., Heath, Andrew C., and Martin, Nicholas G.. 2007. “The Genetics of Voting an Australian Twin Study.” Behaviour Genetics 37: 435–48.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael T., and McClurg, Scott D.. 2009. “Social Networks and American Politics: Introduction to the Special Issue.” American Politics Research 37: 727–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, P.J., and Sears, David O.. 2002. “The Symbolic Racism Scale.” Political Psychology 23: 253–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Mary, Jankowski, Thomas B., and Brown, Ronald E.. 1999. “Pro-Black Doesn't Mean Anti-White: The Structure of African-American Group Identity.” The Journal of Politics 61: 363–86.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Joyce, and Holland, Brent. 2003. “Using Theory to Evaluate Personality and Job-Performance Relations: A Socioanalytic Perspective.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 100–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackman, Mary R. 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Simon, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2009. The 2008 Cooperative Campaign Analysis Project, Release 2.1. Palo Alto, CA: YouGov/Polimetrix [producer and distributor].Google Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 2006. “Value Choices and American Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 706–23.Google Scholar
Jaensch, Erich R. 1938. Der Gegentypus. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.Google Scholar
Jaynes, Gerald D., and Williams, Robin M.. 1989. A Common Destiny: Blacks and American Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
John, Oliver P., and Srivastava, Sanjay. 1999. “The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives.” In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, eds. Pervin, Lawrence A. and John, Oliver P.. New York: Guilford Press, 102–38.Google Scholar
Jost, John T. 2006. “The End of the End of Ideology.” American Psychologist 61: 651–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition”. Psychological Bulletin 129: 339–75.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2000. “Individualism Reconsidered.” In Racialized Politics: The Debate about Racism in America, eds. Sears, David O., Sidanius, Jim, and Bobo, Lawrence. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 44–74.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M.. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sears, David O.. 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism Versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 414–31.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Winter, Nicholas. 2001. “Exploring the Racial Divide: Blacks, Whites, and Opinion on National Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 439–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, Paul. 2000. Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koole, Sander L., Jager, Wander, and van den Berg, Agnes E.. 2001. “On the Social Nature of Personality: Effects of Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Feedback about Collective Resource Use on Cooperation in a Resource Dilemma.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27: 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VI: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Landau, Mark J., Solomon, Sheldon, Greenberg, Jeff, Cohen, Florette, Pyszczynski, Tom, Arndt, Jamie, Miller, Claude H., Ogilvie, Daniel M., and Cook, Alison. 2004. “Deliver Us from Evil: The Effects of Mortality Salience and Reminders of 9/11 on Support for President George W. Bush.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 1136–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Gregory B. 2003. “Black–White Differences in Attitudes toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67: 59–78.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1979. The First New Nation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra L.. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, N.G., Eaves, L.J., Heath, A.C., Jardine, Rosemary, Feingold, Lynn M., and Eysenck, H.J.. 1986. “Transmission of Social Atitudes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 83: 4364–8.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas, and Denton, Nancy. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McAdams, Dan P. 1995. “What Do We Know When We Know a Person?” Journal of Personality 63: 365–96.Google Scholar
McAdams, Dan P., and Pals, Jennifer L.. 2006. “A New Big Five: Fundamental Principles for an Integrative Science of Personality.” American Psychologist 61: 204–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCann, James A. 1997. “Electoral Choices and Core Value Change: The 1992 Presidential Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 564–83.Google Scholar
McCann, Stewart J.H. 1997. “Threatening Times, ‘Strong’ Presidential Popular Vote Winners, and the Victory Margin, 1924–1964.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 160–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert. 1958. “Conservatism and Personality.” American Political Science Review 52: 27–45.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, and Zaller, John. 1984. The American Ethos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, Robert R. 1996. “Social Consequences of Experiential Openness.” Psychological Bulletin 120: 323–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, Robert R., and Costa, Paul T. Jr. 1994. “The Stability of Personality: Observations and Evaluations.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 3: 173–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, Robert R., and Costa, Paul T. Jr. 1996. “Toward a New Generation of Personality Theories: Theoretical Contexts for the Five-Factor Model.” In The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, ed. Wiggins, Jerry S.. New York: Guilford Press, 51–87.Google Scholar
McCrae, Robert R., and Costa, Paul T. Jr. 1999. “A Five-Factor Theory of Personality.” In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, eds. Pervin, Lawrence A. and John, Oliver P.. New York: Guilford Press, 139–53.Google Scholar
McCrae, Robert R., and Costa, Paul T. Jr. 2003. Personlity in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective. 2nd ed.New York: Guilford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Cook, James M.. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert. 1996. “Relations among Political Attitudes, Personality, and Psychopathology Assessed with New Measures of Libertarianism and Conservatism.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 18: 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Halperin, Karen D.. 2008. “A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 335–62.Google Scholar
Neuberg, Steven L., and Newsom, Jason T.. 1993. “Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olver, James M., and Mooradian, Todd A.. 2003. “Personality Traits and Personal Values: A Conceptual and Empirical Integration.” Personality and Individual Differences 35: 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paunonen, Sampo V., and Ashton, Michael C.. 2001. “Big Five Factors and Facets and the Prediction of Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 524–39.Google Scholar
Plomin, Robert, and Caspi, Avshalom. 1999. “Behavior Genetics and Personality.” In Handbook of Personality Research: Theory and Research, eds. Pervin, L.A. and John, O.P.. New York: Guilford Press, 251–76.Google Scholar
Plomin, Robert, DeFries, John C., McClearn, Gerald E., and McGuffin, Peter. 1990. Behavioral Genetics: A Primer. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Rentfrow, Peter J., Jost, John T., Gosling, Samuel D., and Potter, Jonathan. 2009. “Statewide Differences in Personality Predict Voting Patterns in 1996–2004 U.S. Presidential Elections.” In Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, eds. Jost, John T., Kay, Aaron C., and Thorisdottir, Hulda. New York: Oxford University Press, 314–47.Google Scholar
Riemann, Rainer, Grubich, Claudia, Hempel, Susanne, Mergl, Susanne, and Richter, Manfred. 1993. “Personality and Attitudes towards Current Political Topics.” Personality and Individual Differences 15: 313–21.Google Scholar
Salgado, Jesus F. 1997. “The Five Factor Model of Personality and Job Performance in the European Community.” Journal of Applied Psychology 82: 30–43.Google Scholar
Saucier, Gerard. 1994. “Trapnell versus the Lexical Factor: More Ado about Nothing?” European Journal of Personality 8: 291–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, Harald, and Schumann, Siegfried. 2007. “Personality Traits, Partisan Attitudes, and Voting Behavior. Evidence from Germany.” Political Psychology 28: 471–98.Google Scholar
Sellers, Robert M., Smith, Mia A., Shelton, Nicole, Rowley, Stephanie A.J., and Chavous, Tabbye M.. 1998. “Multidimensional Model of Racial Identity: A Reconceptualization of African American Racial Identity.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 2: 18–39.Google Scholar
Settle, Jamie E., Dawes, Christopher T., and Fowler, James H.. 2009. “The Heritability of Partisan Attachment.” Political Research Quarterly 62: 601–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, Chris G., and Duckitt, John. 2008. “Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 12: 248–79.Google Scholar
Sidanius, Jim, and Pratto, Felicia. 1999. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Hierarchy and Domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, Jim, Pratto, Felicia, and Bobo, Lawrence. 1996. “Racism, Conservatism, Affirmative Action, and Intellectual Sophistication: A Matter of Principled Conservatism or Group Dominance?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 476–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, Bledsoe, Timothy, Welch, Susan, and Combs, Michael. 1996. “Making Contact: Black–White Social Interaction in an Urban Setting.” American Journal of Sociology 101: 1306–32.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, Tuch, Steven A., and Martin, Jack K.. 2005. “What's in a Name? Preference for ‘Black’ versus ‘African-American’ among Americans of African Descent.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69: 429–38.Google Scholar
Simien, Evelyn M. 2005. “Race, Gender, and Linked Fate.” Journal of Black Studies 35: 529–50.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Carmines, Edward G.. 1997. Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 1994. From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan S. 1963. “Left and Right: A Basic Dimension of Ideology and Personality.” In The Study of Lives, ed. White, Robert W.. Chicago: Atherton, 388–411.Google Scholar
Trapnell, Paul D. 1994. “Openness versus Intellect: A Lexical Left Turn.” European Journal of Personality 8: 273–90.Google Scholar
Van Gestel, Sofie, and Van Broeckhoven, Christine. 2003. “Genetics of Personality: Are We Making Progress?” Molecular Psychiatry 8: 840–52.Google Scholar
Van Heil, Alain, Kossowska, Malgorzata, and Mervielde, Ivan. 2000. “The Relationship between Openness to Experience and Political Ideology.” Personality and Individual Differences 28: 741–51.Google Scholar
Van Hiel, Alain, and Mervielde, Ivan. 2004. “Openness to Experience and Boundaries in the Mind: Relationships with Cultural and Economic Conservative Beliefs.” Journal of Personality 72: 659–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vavreck, Lynn, and Rivers, Douglas. 2008. “The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18: 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecchione, Michele, and Caprara, Gian Vittorio. 2009. “Personality Determinants of Political Participation: The Contribution of Traits and Self-Efficacy Beliefs.” Personality and Individual Differences 46: 487–92.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde. 1990. “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes: Some Additional Evidence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 248–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, Glenn D. 1973. The Psychology of Conservatism. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Woods, Stephen A., and Hampson, Sarah E.. 2005. “Measuring the Big Five with Single Items Using a Bipolar Response Scale.” European Journal of Personality 19: 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.