Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T13:35:02.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Kim Fridkin Kahn  and
Patrick J. Kenney
Kim Fridkin Kahn
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Patrick J. Kenney
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Does negative campaigning influence the likelihood of voting in elections? Our study of U.S. Senate campaigns indicates the answer is “yes.” We find that people distinguish between useful negative information presented in an appropriate manner and irrelevant and harsh mudslinging. As the proportion of legitimate criticisms increases in campaigns, citizens become more likely to cast ballots. When campaigns degenerate into unsubstantiated and shrill attacks, voters tend to stay home. Finally, we find that individuals vary in their sensitivity to the tenor of campaigns. In particular, the tone is more consequential for independents, for those with less interest in politics, and for those with less knowledge about politics.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 877 - 889
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan I., and Segal, Jeffrey A. 1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul, and Aldrich, John. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.” American Political Science Review 76 (3): 502–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Behr, Roy, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1993. The Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, Simon, Adam, and Valentine, Nicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate.” American Political Science Review 88 (4): 829–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alger, Dean E. 1996. The Media and Politics, 2d ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Basil, Michael, Schooler, Caroline, Reeves, Byron. 1991. “Positive and Negative Political Advertising: Effectiveness of Ads and Perceptions of Candidates.” In Television and Political Advertising, Volume 1: Psychological Processes, ed. Biocca, Frank. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 245–62.Google Scholar
Brians, Craig Leonard, and Wattenberg, Martin P. 1996. “Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 172–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory, Patterson, Samuel, and Markko, Gregory. 1985. “The Mobilization of Voters in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 48 (2): 412–22.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus. 1960. “Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change.” Public Opinion Quarterly 24 (3): 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clarke, Peter, and Fredin, Eric. 1978. “Newspapers, Television, and Political Reasoning.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (2): 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1990. “1990 Senate Election—CQ Calls.” Congressional Quarterly 48 (40): 3280–358. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1962. “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 26 (4): 578–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David. New York: Free Press. Pp. 206–61.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1966. “The Concept of a Normal Vote.” In Elections and the Political Order, ed. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.New York: Wiley. Pp. 9–39.Google Scholar
Copeland, Gary W. 1983. “Activating Voters in Congressional Elections.” Political Behavior 5 (4): 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Munger, Michael C. 1989. “Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 House Elections.” American Political Science Review 83 (1): 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doak, David. 1995. “Going Negative: Rethinking the Rules.” Campaigns and Elections 16 (7): 20–1.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven, and Geer, John. 1998. “A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 573–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles H. 1991. “Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perceptions of U.S. Senate Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark. 1996. “Electoral Participation.” In Comparing Democracies, ed. Le Due, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard, and Norris, Pippa. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 216–35.Google Scholar
Garramone, Gina, Atkin, Charles K., Pinkleton, Bruce E., and Cole, Richard T. 1990. “Effects of Negative Political Advertising on the Political Process.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 34 (3): 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germond, Jack W., and Witcover, Jules. 1996. “Why Americans Don't Go to the Polls.” National Journal 28 (47): 2562–4.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, Edie N., and Traugott, Michael W. 1984. Campaigning for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Kenneth. 1997. “Political Advertising and Political Persuasion in the 1996 Presidential Campaign.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Goodman, Adam. 1995. “Producing TV: A Survival Guide.” Campaigns and Elections 16 (7): 22–4.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris. 1993. Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Guttman, Amy. 1993. “The Disharmony of Democracy.” In Democratic Community, ed. Chapman, John W. and Shapiro, Ian. New York: New York University Press. Pp. 126–60.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D.L., and Zanna, M.P. 1974. “Context Effects in Impression Formation: Changes in Connotative Meaning.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29 (5): 649–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1995. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Leighley, Jan E. 1993. “Party Ideology, Organization, and Competitiveness as Mobilizing Forces in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1158–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1997. The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Cartee, Karen S., and Copeland, Gary A. 1991. Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Joslyn, Richard. 1984. Mass Media and Elections. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Just, Marion R., Crigler, Ann N., Alger, Dean E., Cook, Timothy E., Kern, Montague, and West, Darrell M. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim F., and Kenney, Patrick J. 1997. “A Model of Candidate Evaluations in Senate Elections: The Impact of Campaign Intensity.” Journal of Politics 4 (4): 1173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanouse, David E., and Hanson, L. Reid Jr. 1972. “Negativity in Evaluations.” In Attribution: Perceiving Causes of Behavior, ed. Jones, Edward E., Kanouse, David E., Kelley, Harold H., Nisbett, Richard E., Valins, Stuart, and Weiner, Bernard. Morriston, NJ: General Learning. Pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
Kamber, Victor. 1997. Poison Politics: Are Negative Campaigns Destroying Democracy? New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr. 1956. American State Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th ed. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Koutsoyiannis, A. 1977. Theory of Econometrics. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasno, Jonathan S. 1994. Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard. 1982. “Negativity in Person Perception.” Political Behavior 4 (4): 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard. 1985. “Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, Mary Ellen. 1977. Phantom Politics: Campaigning in California. Washington, DC: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Luntz, Frank I. 1988. Candidates Consultants and Campaigns: The Style and Substance of American Electioneering. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luskin, Robert. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (4): 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, William G. 1993. “Trends: Trends in Media Usage.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (4): 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., and Steenbergen, Marco. 1997. “Pictures in the Head: Memory Representation of Political Candidates.” In Political Judgment: Structure and Process, ed. Lodge, Milton and McGraw, Kathleen M.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., Kinder, Donald R., Rosenstone, Steven J., and the National Election Studies. 1993. American National Election Study: Pooled Senate Election Study, 1988, 1990, 1992 [computer file] (Study #9580). Conducted by University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. 2d ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies/Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1993.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel, and Caldeira, Gregory. 1983. “Getting Out the Vote: Participation in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 77 (3): 675–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1986. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 80 (1): 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, Lyn, and Rusk, Jerold G. 1995. “Candidates, Issues, and Participation in Senate Election.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (3): 305–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richey, Marjorie H., Bono, Frank S., Lewis, Helen V., and Richey, Harold W. 1982. “Selectivity of Negative Bias in Impression Formation.” Journal of Social Psychology 116 (1): 107–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roddy, Brian L., and Garramone, Gina M. 1988. “Appeals and Strategies of Political Advertising.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 32 (4): 415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Southwell, Priscilla L. 1991. “Voter Turnout in the 1986 Congressional Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 19 (1): 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill, Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Glass, David P. 1987. “Residential Mobility and Vote Turnout.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy A. 1992. The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Thorson, Esther, Christ, William G., and Caywood, Clark. 1991. “The Effects of Issue-Image Strategies, Attack and Support Appeals, Music, and Visual Content in Political Commercials.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 35 (4): 465–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Darrell M. 1997. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952–1996. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Westlye, Mark C. 1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.