Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T22:49:55.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WTO Upholds U.S. Section 301 Trade Authority As GATT-Consistent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Section 301” refers to the authorities contained in 19 U.S.C. §§2411-19 (1994).

2 Retaliation is mandatory for violations of U.S. rights under an international trade agreement. Retaliation is discretionary when the foreign state’s action is determined to be “unreasonable or discriminatory” and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce.

3 USTR, Table of Section 301 Cases (Aug. 19, 1999), available in <http://www.ustr.gov/reports/301report/act301.htm> .

4 See generally Warren Maruyama, Section 301 and the Appearance of Unilateralism, 11 MlCH.J. In t ’l L. 394 (1990); Alan O. Sykes, Constructive Unilateral Threats in International Commercial Relations: The Limited Case for Section 301, 23 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 263 (1992).

5 United States-Sections 301-10 of the Trade Act of 1974, WTO Doc. WT/DS152/11 (Jan. 26, 1999). Several other states appeared as third parties in the dispute.

6 United States-Sections 301-310 of the Trade Act of 1974, WTO Doc. WT/DS152/R (Dec. 22, 1999).

7 Id., para. 7.131; see Joseph Kahn, U.S. Wins Round in Trade War with Europe, N.Y. TIMES, Dec. 23, 1999, at C2.