Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:39:14.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tenth Circuit Upholds Injunction Barring Oklahoma Anti-Sharia, Anti-international Law Constitutional Amendment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John R. Crook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 106 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 365 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Awad v. Ziriax, 754 F. Supp. 2d 1298, 1308 (W.D. Okla. 2010).

2 Awad v. Ziriax, No. 10-6273, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 475, 670 F.3d 1111 (10th Cir. Jan. 10, 2012).

3 Id. at *7-8.

4 Id. at *8-9 (quoting revised ballot title).

5 Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 104 AJIL 654, 658 (2010)Google Scholar; 105 AJIL 122, 123 (2011).

6 U.S. CONST, amend. I, cl. 1: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. ...”

7 Awad, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 475, at *14.

8 4d.

9 Id. at *20-24 (citations omitted).

10 Id. at *28.

11 "To obtain a preliminary injunction, Mr. Awad must show that four factors weigh in his favor: '(1) [he] is substantially likely to succeed on the merits; (2) [he] will suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is denied; (3) [his] threatened injury outweighs the injury the opposing party will suffer under the injunction; and (4) the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest.'" Id. at *28–29.

12 Id. at *38–39.

13 Id. at *41.

14 Id. at *42–43 (citations omitted).

15 Id. at *47–48 (citations omitted).