Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:34:48.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tentative Settlement of ATCA Human Rights Suits Against Unocal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Unocal Settles Rights Suit in Myanmar, N.Y. Times, Dec. 14, 2004, at C6 Google Scholar; Unocal to Settle Rights Claims, Wash. Post, Dec. 14, 2004, at E2 Google Scholar.

2 28 U.S.C. §1350 (2000).

3 See Aceves, William J., Case Report: Doe v. Unocal, 92 AJIL 309 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Doe v. Unocal Corp., 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (CD. Cal. 2000). On the early phases of the Unocal litigation, see Sean D. Murphy, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 95 AJIL 145 (2001).

5 Murphy, Sean D., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 97 AJIL 703 (2003)Google ScholarPubMed.

6 Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 124 S. Ct. 2739, 2754–55 (2004); see Roth, Brad R., Case Report: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain; United States v. Alvarez–Machain, 98 AJIL 798 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Murphy, Sean D., Contemporary Practice of the United States, id. at 845, 847 Google Scholar.

7 Unocal Press Release, Settlement Reached in Human Rights Lawsuit (Dec. 13, 2004), at <http://www.unocal.com/uclnews/2004news/index.htm>.