No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
1 Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, Jan. 30, 1975, 14 ILM 336 (1975), available at http://www.oas.org/jundico/english/treaues/b-35.html.
2 Figueiredo Ferraz E Engenharia De Projeto Ltda. v. Peru, 665 F.3d 384 (2d Cir. 2011).
3 The operation of the Peruvian statute was not clear from the record, and the court did not purport to state it precisely.
4 9 U.S.C. §§1-16(2006).
5 Consultoria E Engenharia de Projeto Ltda. v. Republic of Peru, 655 F.Supp.2d 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
6 Figueiredo Ferraz, 665 F.3d at 390. The dissent (and some outside observers) found this position unpersuasive, believing that forum non conveniens should not be available to contest an action intended to gain enforcement of an arbitral award against the losing party’s assets in the jurisdiction.
7 Id. at 391 (citations and footnotes omitted).
8 Id. at 392 (citations omitted).
9 Id. at 394 n. 11.
10 ld. at 394, 402-03 (Lynch, J., dissenting) (citations omitted).