Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:39:31.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

L’Évolution du Concept de la Neutralité. By Hamed sultan. Cairo: F. E. Noury & Fils., 1938. pp. xvi, 351. Bibliography.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Francis Deák
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 1941 , pp. 406 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf., e.g., the types of early neutrality treaties in Mr. Sultan’s book, p. 26 ff., with the Columbia neutrality studies, Vol. 1 (by Jessup and Deák), p. 24 ff.; the characteristics of the contraband concept in Sultan, pp. 32, 35, with the analysis in Jessup and Deák, pp. 51, 103.

2 See, e.g., p. 32, note 1, where the author quotes Judge Moore’s definition of contraband, presumably from the Political Science Quarterly, although at the place cited there is no writing of Judge Moore’s published or even quoted.