Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T10:44:46.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Courts Without Borders: Law, Politics and U.S. Extraterritoriality. By Tonya L. Putnam. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. xiii, 315. Index. $99.99, £64.99.

Review products

Courts Without Borders: Law, Politics and U.S. Extraterritoriality. By Tonya L. Putnam. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. xiii, 315. Index. $99.99, £64.99.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2018

Peter D. Trooboff
Affiliation:
Honorary Editor, Covington & Burling LLP
Mawuse Barker-Vormawor
Affiliation:
Global Visiting Lawyer, Covington & Burling LLP

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by The American Society of International Law 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. Ct. 1659 (2013).

2 Int'l Shoe v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945).

3 Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014).

4 Citing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and noting that it “does not allow for private rights of action.”

5 22 C.F.R. Part 130 (Political Contributions, Fees and Commissions).

6 Case C-523/10, Winstersteiger AG v. Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2012:220 (CJEU Apr. 19, 2012); Joined Cases C-509/09 & C-161/10, eDate Advertising and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2011:685 (CJEU Oct. 25, 2011).

7 Ralf Michaels, Two Paradigms of Jurisdiction, 27 Mich. J. Int'l L. 1003, 1027–29, 1045 (2005).

8 Id. at 1045.

9 United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000).

10 See Restatement (Fourth) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, §203, cmt. a (tentative draft no. 3, Mar. 20, 2017) (not yet approved by the members of and not yet the position of the American Law Institute).

11 Id., §203, Reporters Notes 2 (Rationales for the Presumption).

12 See generally Kahneman, Daniel, Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, 93 Am. Econ. Rev. 1449 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard, Bounded Rationality and the Diffusion of Modern Investment Treaties, 58 Int'l Stud. Q. 1 (2014)Google Scholar; Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard & Aisbett, Emma, When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rational Learning, 65 World Pol. 273 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jolls, Christine, Sunstein, Cass R. & Thaler, Richard, A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics, Stanford L. Rev. 1471 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ko, Haksoo, Behavioral Law and Economics, in Encyclopedia of Law and Economics 1 (Backhaus, Jürgen ed., 2021)Google Scholar, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_100-1.

13 Benforado, Adam & Hanson, Jon D., Legal Academic Backlash: The Response of Legal Theorists to Situationist Insights, 57 Emory L.J. 1087, 1118 (2008)Google Scholar.