Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbjwg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T06:39:02.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Avigliano v. Sumitomo Shoji American, Inc.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Monroe Leigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , July 1981 , pp. 671 - 673
Copyright
Copyright © The American Society of International Law 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This issue is currently also being litigated in another federal jurisdiction. Spiess v. Itoh, 469 F. Supp. 1 (1979), appeal pending in the 5th Cir. (No. 79–2382) at the time of this writing; for a summary of the district court’s opinion, see 74 AJIL 195 (1980). Another recent case in which the issue was raised with respect to a similar provision in the 1951 FCN Treaty between the United States and Denmark is Linskey v. Heidelberg Eastern, Inc., 470 F. Supp. 1181 (E.D.N.Y. 1979). The district court decided that the Treaty did not exempt the AmericanTincorporated subsidiary of a Danish company from liability under title VII.

2 Art. XXII(3) of the Treaty provides:

As used in the present Treaty, the term “companies” means corporations, partnerships, companies and other associations, whether or not with limited liability and whether or not for pecuniary profit. Companies constituted under the applicable laws and regulations within the territories of either Party shall be deemed companies thereof and shall have their juridical status recognized within the territories of the other Party.

3 The district court also relied on the lower court decision in Itoh, supra, which had followed the same reasoning.