Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:34:57.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict. Edited by Andrew Clapham and Paola Gaeta. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Pp. lxxxiv, 909. Index. $210, cloth; $67.50, paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jens David Ohlin*
Affiliation:
Cornell Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nils Melzer, International Committee of the Red Cross, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law (2009), available at https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc-002-0990.pdf.

2 See Parks, W. Hays, Part IX of the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities” Study: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect, 42 N.Y.U.J. Int’l L. & Pol. 769, 805 (2010)Google Scholar.

3 The issue is briefly discussed by Michael Schmitt in his excellent chapter entitled “Air Warfare” (pp. 129–30).

4 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), Merits, 1986 ICJ Rep. 14 (June 27).

5 Schabas, William A., Lex Specialis? Belt and Suspenders? The Parallel Operation of Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Conundrum of Jus ad Bellum, 40 Isr. L. Rev. 592, 607 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (“International human rights law is not indifferent to and does not look favorably upon unjust war. Indeed, it might be said that there is an anti-war or pacifist dimension to international human rights law that is largely absent— for understandable and logical reasons—from international humanitarian law.”).