Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:39:21.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National City Bank of New York v. Republic of China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2017

Oliver J. Lissitzyn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , July 1955 , pp. 405 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reed, Burton and Clark, JJ., dissented.

2 48 A.J.I.L. 332 (1954).

3 In a footnote, the Supreme Court indicated that the counterclaims had been confined to a set-off “as a result of the accepted jurisprudence of sovereign immunity.”

4 Footnotes omitted.