Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:07:25.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nation v. State; Judgment for Nation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

William Gorham Rice
William Gorham Rice*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 1950 , pp. 162 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © by the American Society of International Law 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 As in the “nations” of students at medieval (and some modern) universities.

2 One does not casually realize how generally these words have crept into legal use. For example, the Provisional Agreement of 1946 between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines, Dept. of State, T. I. A. S. 1539, 60 Stat. 1800, never uses the word “state.” In the preamble it speaks or “peoples.” Then the United States recognizes the Republic “as a separate self-governing nation.” Finally the “parties” agree to negotiate treaties “regulating relations between the two countries.” The General Relations Treaty of 1946 between them, T. I. A. S. 1568, 61 Stat. 1174, likewise uses both “nation” and “country,” never “state.”