Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:51:47.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. By Jutta Brunnée and Stephen J. Toope. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. xviii, 411. Index. $112, cloth; $58, paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nico Krisch*
Affiliation:
Hertie School of Governance

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law 221 (rev. ed. 1969)Google Scholar.

2 Id.

3 Id. at 200.

4 E.g., Thomas M. Franck, The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (1990).

5 See, e.g., Simmons, Beth A., Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics 11258 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See, e.g., Hart, H. L. A., Book Review, 78 Harv. L. Rev. 1281 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (reviewing Lon L. Fuller, the Morality of Law (1964)).

7 See also David Dyzenhaus, Accountability and the Concept of (Global) Administrative Law, in ACTA Juridica 2009, at 3.

8 See, e.g., Kramer, Matthew, Scrupulousness Without Scruples: A Critique of Lon Fuller and His Defenders, 18 Oxford J. Leg. Stud. 235 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Fuller, supra note l, at 81-91.

10 See Koskenniemi, Mariti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (rev. ed. 2005)Google Scholar.

11 Kymlicka, Will, Liberalism, Community and Culture 232 (1989)Google Scholar (critiquing Michael Walzer’s attempt to ground morality in shared social understandings as set forth in Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (1983)).

12 Fuller, supra note 1, at 198 -200; see also Nicholson, Peter P., The Internal Morality of Law: Fuller and His Critics, 84 Ethics 307, 30911 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Fuller, supra note 1, at 39-44; Nicholson, supra note 12, at 309-11, 321.

14 See Fuller, supra note 1, at 33-39, where Fuller uses the imaginary figure of King Rex to highlight eight ways in which a lawgiver can fail so as to provide the ground for his development of the eight criteria of legality.

15 But see id. at 232-33.

16 Id. at 39-40; see also id. at 216-17.

17 Id. at 162.

18 See Walzer, Michael, The Moral Standing of States; A Response to Four Critics, 9 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 209 (1980)Google Scholar; 23 Ethics & Int’l Aff., Winter 2009 (issue devoted to conference recognizing Michael Walzer).

19 Fuller, supra note l, at 233.

20 See Hersch Lauterpacht, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (With Special Reference to International Arbitration) (1927).

21 See Fuller, supra note 1, at 125-29.

22 See also Waldron, Jeremy, Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law?, 22 Eur. J. Int’l L. 315 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 On hegemons’ efforts towards greater hierarchy, see Krisch, Nico, International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order, 16 Eur. J. Int’l L. 369 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Benedict Kingsbury, Nico Krisch & Stewart, Richard B., The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, 68 L. & Cont. Prob., Summer-Autumn 2005 Google Scholar, at 15.

25 Kingsbury, Benedict, The Concept of ‘Law’ in Global Administrative Law, 20 Eur. J. Int’l L. 23, 40 (2009)Google Scholar.

26 Waldron, supra note 22, at 322-43.

27 See, e.g., David Dyzenhaus, Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar (1997).