Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:32:31.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

D.C. Circuit Majority Undercuts Panel Pronouncements Denying Domestic Legal Force of International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6 Al-Bihani v. Obama, 594 F.Supp.2d 35 (D.D.C. 2009).

7 Al-Bihani v. Obama, 590 F.3d 866 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

8 Authorization for the Use of Military Force, Pub. L. No. 107-40, §2(a), 115 Stat. 224 (2001) (reprinted at 50 U.S.C. §1541 note).

9 Al-Bihani v. Obama, 590 F.3d at 871 (citations omitted).

10 Id. at 885 (Williams, J., concurring).

11 Chief Judge Semelle and Circuit Judges Ginsburg, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, and Griffith.

12 Savage, Charlie, Appeals Court Backs Away from War Powers Ruling, N.Y. Times, Sept. 1, 2010 Google Scholar, at A14.

13 Al-Bihani v. Obama, No. 09-5051, 2010 U.S. App. lexis 18169, at *2 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 31, 2010) (order denying rehearing en banc, appended statement of Semelle, C.J., Ginsburg, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, & Griffith, JJ.).