Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:23:55.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mycorrhizae in sustainable agriculture. I. Effects on seed yield and soil aggregation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Gabor J. Bethlenfalvay
Affiliation:
Plant Physiologist, USDAARS, Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory (HCRL), Corvallis, OR 97330;
José-Miguel Barea
Affiliation:
Head, Microbiology Department, Estación Experimental del Zaidfn (EEZ), 18008 Granada, Spain.
Get access

Abstract

Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi colonize plant roots and the surrounding bulk soil. They transport mineral nutrients from the soil to the plant and carbon compounds from the plant to the soil, and have pervasive effects on plant form and function and on the composition of the soil microbiota. This experiment evaluated VAM effects on plants and soil to determine if VAM fungi mediate a relationship between changes in seed yield and soil aggregation. In a pot experiment with peas, an isolate of the VAM fungus Glomus mosseae (Nicol & Gerd.) Gerd. and Trappe did not significantly affect seed yield (8%), but improved soil aggregation by 400% in one soil, a gray silt-loam high in organic matter (OM) and phosphorus. In another soil, a yellow clay-loam low in OM and phosphorus, seed yield was enhanced significantly (57%), but there was only a small change (50%) in aggregation. The results suggest that carbon allocation between the plant (measured as seed yield) and the soil (measured as the formation of water-stable aggregates) is influenced by this VAM fungus. The soil appeared to gain carbon at the expense of carbon lost by the plant Mycorrhizal fungi thus seem to affect two biologically controlled aspects of sustainable agriculture: plant production and soil quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ambler, J.R., and Young, J.L.. 1977. Techniques for determining root length infected by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 41:551556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Andersen, C.P., and Rygiewicz, P.T.. 1991. Stress interactions and mycorrhizal plant response: Understanding carbon allocation priorities. Environmental Pollution 73:217244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Bagyaraj, D.J. 1992. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza: Application in agriculture. Methods in Microbiology 24:359373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Barea, J.M., and Jeffries, P., (in press). Arbuscular mycorrhizas in sustainable plant-soil systems. In Varma, A. and Hock, B. (eds). Mycorrhiza: Function, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
5.Bethlenfalvay, G.J. 1992. Mycorrhizae and crop productivity. In Bethlenfalvay, G.J. and Linderman, R.G. (eds). Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. Spec. Pub. No. 54. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bethlenfalvay, G.J., and Schüepp, H.. (1994). Arbuscular mycorrhizae and agrosystem stability. In Gianinazzi, S. and Schüepp, H. (eds). Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizas on Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Ecosystems. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cambardella, C.A., and Elliott, E.T.. 1993. Carbon and nitrogen distribution in aggregates from cultivated and native grassland soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 57:10711076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Cooke, G.W. 1982. Fertilizing for Maximum Yield. 3rd ed.Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
9.Eissenstat, D.M., Graham, J.H., Syvertsen, J.P., and Drouillard, D.L.. 1993. Carbon economy of sour orange in relation to mycorrhizal colonization and phosphorus status. Annals of Botany 71:110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Gianinazzi, S., Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., and Trouvelot, A.. 1982. Les mycorrhizes, partie intégrante de la plante: Biologie et perspectives d'utilization. Les Colloques d'INRA, No. 13. Paris, France.Google Scholar
11.Giovanetti, M., and Mosse, B.. 1980. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytologist 84:489500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Graham, J.H., Eissenstat, D.M., and Drouillard, D.L.. 1991. On the relationship between a plant's mycorrhizal dependency and rate of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. Functional Ecology 5:773779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Harley, J.L., and Smith, S.E.. 1983. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, London, England.Google Scholar
14.Jakobsen, I., and Rosendahl, L.. 1990. Carbon flow into soil and external hyphae from roots of mycorrhizal cucumber plants. New Phytologist 115:7783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kemper, W.D., and Rosenau, R.C.. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In Klute, A. (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph 9. Amer. Soc. Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 425442.Google Scholar
16.Koide, R.T., and Schreiner, R.P.. 1992. Regulation of the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 43:557581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Linderman, R.G. 1992. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and soil microbial interactions. In Bethlenfalvay, G.J. and Lindennan, R.G. (eds). Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. Spec. Pub. No. 54. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 4570.Google Scholar
18.Miller, R.M., and Jastrow, J.D.. 1992. The role of mycorrhizal fungi in soil conservation. In Bethlenfalvay, G.J. and Linderman, R.G. (eds). Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. Spec. Pub. No. 54. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 2944.Google Scholar
19.Nelson, L.A. 1989. A statistical editor's viewpoint of statistical usage in horticultural science publications. HortSci. 24:5357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Papendick, R.I., and Parr, J.F.. 1992. Soil quality—the key to a sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Parr, J.F., Papendick, R.I., Hornick, S.B., and Meyer, R.E.. 1992. Soil quality: Attributes and relationship to alternative and sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Phillips, J.M., and Hayman, D.S.. 1970. Improved procedure for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions British Mycological Soc. 55:158161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Reganold, J.P., Papendick, R.I., and Parr, J.F.. 1990. Sustainable agriculture. Scientific American 262(6): 112120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Reid, C.P.P. 1990. Mycorrhizas. In Lynch, J.M. (ed). The Rhizosphere. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, pp. 281315.Google Scholar
25.Smith, S.E., and Gianinazzi-Pearson, V.. 1988. Physiological interactions between symbionts in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 39:221244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Sylvia, D.M., and Williams, S.E.. 1992. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and environmental stress. In Bethlenfalvay, G.J. and Linderman, R.G. (eds). Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. Spec. Pub. No. 54. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 101124.Google Scholar
27.Thomas, R.S., Franson, R.L., and Bethlenfalvay, G.J.. 1993. Separation of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and root effects on soil aggregation. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 57:7781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Tisdall, J.M. 1991. Fungal hyphae and structural stability of soil. Australian J. Soil Research 29:729743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Tisdall, J.M., and Oades, J.M.. 1979. Stabilization of soil aggregates by the root systems of ryegrass. Australian J. Soil Research 17:429441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Wang, G.M., Coleman, D.C., Freckman, D.W., Dyer, M.I., McNaughton, S.J., Acra, M.A., and Goeschl, J.D.. 1989. Carbon partitioning patterns of mycorrhizal versus nonmycorrhizal plants: Real-time dynamic measurements using 11CO2. New Phytologist 112:489493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar