Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:57:03.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Legal Education in Producing Psychological Distress Among Law Students and Lawyers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Get access

Abstract

The anecdotal literature suggests that the process of legal education impairs the maintenance of emotional well-being in law students. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a cross-sequential research design that empirically assessed the validity of this hypothesis. Data were collected, using four standardized self-report instruments (Brief Symptom Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist, and Hassle Scale) on subjects before and during law school and after graduation. Before law school, subjects expressed psychopathological symptom responses that were similar to the normal population. Yet during law school and after graduation symptom levels were significantly elevated. The implications of these results are presented.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1986 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 C. A. Auerbach, Legal Education and Some of Its Discontents, 34 J. Legal Educ. 43 (1984).Google Scholar

2 A. K. Pye, Legal Education Past and Future: A Summer Carol, 32 J. Legal Educ. 367 (1982).Google Scholar

3 F. K. Zemans & V. G. Rosenblum, The Making of a Public Profession 1 (Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1981).Google Scholar

4 R. B. McKay, Too Many Bright Law Students? 33 J. Legal Educ. 596, 596 (1983).Google Scholar

5 P. B. Bauer, On Producing Intellectual Giants and Moral Midgets, Learning & L. 12–15 (1975); J. M. Hedegard, The Impact of Legal Education: An In-Depth Examination of Career-relevant Interests, Attitudes, and Personality Traits Among First-Year Law Students, 1979 A.B.F. Res. J. 791; S. Macaulay, Law Schools and the World Outside Their Doors. II: Some Notes on Two Recent Studies of the Chicago Bar, 32 J. Legal Educ. 506 (1982); H. Packer & T. Ehrlich, New Directions for Legal Education (New York: Council on Legal Education for Professional Responsibility, Inc., 1972); A. J. Schwartz, Law, Lawyers and Law School: Perspectives from the First-Year Class, 30 J. Legal Educ. 437 (1980); M. J. Schwartz, The Reach and Limits of Legal Education, 32 J. Legal Educ. 543 (1982); Zemans & Rosenblum, supra note 3.Google Scholar

6 J. B. Taylor, Law School Stress and the “Deformation Professionelle,” 27 J. Legal Educ. 251, 252 (1975).Google Scholar

7 A. S. Watson, Some Factors in the Contemporary Regulation of the American Legal and Medical Professions 26 (Issaac Ray Lecture, University of California at Berkeley Law School, 1979).Google Scholar

8 T. E. Willging & T. G. Dunn, The Moral Development of the Law Student: Theory and Data on Legal Education, 31 J. Legal Educ. 306 (1981).Google Scholar

9 See, e.g., P. D. Carrington & J. C. James, The Alienation of Law Students, 75 Mich. L. Rev. 887 (1977); Comment, Anxiety in the First Semester of Law School, 1968 Wis. L. Rev. 1201; L. D. Eron & R. S. Redmoum, The Effect of Legal Education on Attitudes, 9 J. Legal Educ. 431 (1957); M. Heins, S. N. Fahey, & R. C. Henderson, Law Students and Medical Students: A Comparison of Perceived Stress, 33 J. Legal Educ. 511 (1983); R. Stevens, Law Schools and Law Students, 59 Va. L. Rev. 551 (1973); and Taylor, supra note 6.Google Scholar

10 See, e.g., Carrington & James, supra note 9; Comment, supra note 9; Heins et al., supra note 9; Stevens, supra note 9; and Taylor, supra note 6.Google Scholar

11 See, e.g., Carrington & James, supra note 9; Comment, supra note 9; Stevens, supra note 9; and Taylor, supra note 6.Google Scholar

12 Solkoff, N., The Use of Personality and Attitude Tests in Predicting the Academic Success of Medical and Law Students, 43 J. Med. Educ. 1250 (1968).Google Scholar

13 Hedegard, supra note 5.Google Scholar

14 E. G. Gee & D.W. Jackson, Current Studies of Legal Education: Findings and Recommendations, 32 J. Legal Educ. 471 (1982).Google Scholar

15 Shanfield, S., & G. A. H. Benjamin, Psychological Distress Among Medical and Law Students, 35 J. Legal Educ. (1985).Google Scholar

16 L. R. Derogatis & N. Melisaratos, The Brief Symptom Inventory: An Introductory Report, 13 Psychological Med. 595 (1983). See infra at note 21 for a description of this inventory.Google Scholar

17 A. T. Beck, C. H. Ward, M. Mendelson, J. Mock, & J. Erbaugh, An Inventory for Measuring Depression, 4 Archives Gen. Psychiatry 561 (1961). See infra at note 26 for a description of this inventory.Google Scholar

18 N. Zuckerman & B. Lubin, Handbook: Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist (San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1965). See infra at note 29 for a description of this inventory.Google Scholar

19 J. C. Nunnally, An Overview of Psychological Measurement, in B. B. Wolman, ed., Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: A Handbook 97–146 (New York: Plenum, 1978).Google Scholar

20 Anastasi, A., Psychological Testing (5th ed. New York: Macmillan Co., 1982).Google Scholar

21 Derogatis & Melisaratos, supra note 16.Google Scholar

22 Id. at 597.Google Scholar

23 I. E. Waskow, Selection of a Core Battery, in Psychotherapy Change Measures (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1975).Google Scholar

24 L. R. Derogatis, K. Rickels, & A. F. Rock, The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A Step in the Validation of a New Self-Report Scale, 1976 Brit. J. Psychiatry 280.Google Scholar

25 Derogatis & Milisaratos, supra note 16.Google Scholar

26 Beck et al., supra note 17.Google Scholar

27 Id.; W. Bumberry, J. M. Oliver, & J. N. McClure, Validation of the Beck Depression Inventory in a University Population Using Psychiatric Estimates as the Criterion, 46 J. Consulting & Clinical Psychology 150 (1978).Google Scholar

28 P. W. Beck & D. Burns, Anxiety and Depression in Law Students: Cognitive Intevention, 30 J. Legal Educ. 270 (1980).Google Scholar

29 Zuckerman & Lubin, supra note 18.Google Scholar

31 A. D. Kanner, J. Coyne, C. Schaefer, & R. S. Lazarus, Comparison of Two Modes of Stress Management: Daily Hassles and Uplifts vs. Major Life Events, 4 J. Behav. Med. 1 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 R. S. Lazarus & A. DeLongis, Psychological Stress and Coping in Aging, 3 Am. Psychologist 245, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Kanner et al., supra note 31.Google Scholar

34 B. P. Dohrenwend & P.E. Shrout, “HASSLES” in the Conceptalization and Measurement of Life Stress Variables, 40 Am. Psychologist 780 (1985).Google Scholar

35 R. S. Lazarus, A. DeLongis, S. Folkman, & R. Gruen, Stress and Adaptational Outcomes: The Problem of Confounded Measures, 40 Am. Psychologist 770 (1985).Google Scholar

36 Shanfield & Benjamin, supra note 15.Google Scholar

37 A. R. Feinstein, Clinical Biostatistics (St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1977).Google Scholar

38 W. R. Klecka, Discriminant Analysis, in John L. Sullivan, ed., Applications in Social Sciences (Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage Publications, 1980).Google Scholar

39 G. A. Gluck, Interpersonal Traits in the Socialization of Law Students in a University Law School, 40. Dissertation Abstracts Int'l (1979).Google Scholar

40 Gains, J., Department of Biomedical Statistics (personal communication, April 1984).Google Scholar

41 G. A. H. Benjamin, Law Student Stress (manuscript, University of Arizona, 1982); see also id., Psychological Distress in Law Students and Lawyers: Imagined, Ingrained, or Induced (Tucson: University of Arizona, 1985).Google Scholar

43 Kanner el al., supra note 31.Google Scholar

44 T. L. Shaffer & R. S. Redmount, Lawyers, Law Students, and People (Colorado Springs: Shepard's, 1977).Google Scholar

45 Marcus, P., Report to the President 1983–1984 (Tucson: University of Arizona Law College Association, 1983).Google Scholar

46 Shaffer & Redmount, supra note 44.Google Scholar

47 Fossum, D., Law Professors: A Profile of the Teaching Branch of the Legal Profession, 1980 A.B.F. Res. J. 501.Google Scholar

48 Shaffer & Redmount, supra note 44.Google Scholar

49 Auerbach, supra note 1.Google Scholar

50 J. H. Boyd & M.M. Weisman, Epidemiology of Affective Disorders, 38 Archives Gen. Psychiatry 1039 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 Shanfield & Benjamin, supra note 15.Google Scholar

52 Kanner et al, supra note 31.Google Scholar

53 R. C. Cramton, The Current State of the Law Curriculum, 32 J. Legal Educ. 321, 329 (1982).Google Scholar

54 J. C. Halpern, On the Politics and Pathology of Legal Education, 32 J. Legal Educ. 383, 389 (1982).Google Scholar

55 Id. at 383.Google Scholar

56 Cramton, supra note 53.Google Scholar

57 Cited by Gee & Jackson, supra note 14, at 485.Google Scholar

58 Auerbach, supra note 1, at 57.Google Scholar

59 Cramton, supra note 53; A. Hacker, The Shame of Professional Schools, 32 J. Legal Educ. 278 (1982).Google Scholar

60 D. D. Bowen & R. H. Kilmann, Developing a Comparative Measure of the Learning Climate in Professional Schools, 60 J. Applied Psychology 71 (1975); W. E. Gregg, Several Factors Affecting Graduate Student Satisfaction, 43 J. Higher Educ. 483 (1972).Google Scholar

61 Carrington & James, supra note 9.Google Scholar

62 Hacker, supra note 59, at 278–79.Google Scholar

63 Cramton, supra note 53; Hacker, supra note 59; J. White, Improved Student/Faculty Ratio Affects Teaching, Syllabus, March 1984, at 12.Google Scholar

64 Beck & Burns, supra note 28; see H. H. Strupp & S. W. Hadely, Specific vs. Nonspecific Factors in Psychotherapy: A Controlled Study of Outcome, 36 Archives Gen. Psychiatry 1125 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

65 Meltsner, M., Feeling Like a Lawyer, 33 J. Legal Educ. 624, 633 (1983).Google Scholar

66 Zemans and Rosenblum, supra note 3, at 137.Google Scholar

67 Bauer, supra note 5, at 15.Google Scholar

68 Eron & Redmount, supra note 9, at 441.Google Scholar

69 Watson, supra note 7, at 9.Google Scholar

70 Zemans & Rosenblum, supra note 2.Google Scholar

71 J. P. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy (New York: Basic Books, 1975); see M. Balint, The Other Part of Medicine, Lancet, Jan. 7, 1961, at 40–42.Google Scholar

72 Halpern, supra note 54, at 394.Google Scholar

73 D. C. Bok, A Flawed System of Law Practice and Training, 33 J. Legal Educ. 570 (1983).Google Scholar

74 Etzioni, A., Organizational Control Structure, in J.G. March, ed., Handbook of Organizations 650 (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965).Google Scholar

75 Auerbach, supra note 1.Google Scholar

76 A. J. Schwartz, supra note 5, at 438.Google Scholar