Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:01:15.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermally Altered Siliceous Stone from Prehistoric Contexts: Intentional versus Unintentional Alteration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael L. Gregg  and
Richard J. Grybush
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that the flaking characteristics of certain siliceous stone materials are enhanced by carefully controlled annealing and that intentional annealing was indeed practiced by prehistoric Native Americans. A note of caution is extended here to investigators who might extend evidence for thermally altered siliceous stone from a site to interpretations that intentional annealing was practiced at the site. The use of fire in quarrying has a long history throughout the world, and much heat-treated material from sites may have been thermally altered unintentionally, the result of quarrying practices.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 189 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behm, Jeffery A., and Faulkner, Alaric 1974 Hixton quartzite: experiments in heat treatment. The Wisconsin Archeologist 55:271–76.Google Scholar
Collins, Michael B., and Fenwick, Jason M. 1974 Heat treating of chert: methods of interpretation and their application. Plains Anthropologist 19:134–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, D. E., and Butler, B. R. 1964 Notes on experiments in flintknapping. 1: Heat treatment of silica minerals. Tebiwa 7:1–6.Google Scholar
Elkin, A. P. 1948 Pressure flaking in the northern Kimberly, Australia. Man 48:110–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, H. H. 1940 Flint-working techniques of the American Indians: an experimental study. The Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Fowke, Gerard 1902 Archaeological history of Ohio: the mound builders and later Indians. F. J. Heer, Columbus.Google Scholar
Hester, T. R. 1972 Ethnographic evidence for the thermal alteration of siliceous stone. Tebiwa 12:63–65.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. H. 1919 Handbook of aboriginal American antiquities. Part 1: introductory, the lithic industries. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 60.Google Scholar
Kopper, John S., and Rossello-Bordoy, Guillermo 1974 Megalithic quarrying techniques and limestone technology in eastern Spain. Journal of Field A rchaeology 1:161–70.Google Scholar
Man, E. H. 1883 Stone implements. Royal Anthropological Institute, Journal 12:379–81.Google Scholar
Mandeville, M. D. 1973 A consideration of the thermal pre-treatment of chert. Plains Anthropologist 18:177–202.Google Scholar
Mandeville, M. D., and Jeffrey Flenniken, J. 1974 A comparison of the flaking qualities of Nehawka chert before and after thermal pretreatment. Plains Anthropologist 19:146–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, Stephen 1877 Tribes of California. Contributions to North American Ethnology 3. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Purdy, Barbara Ann 1974 Investigations concerning the thermal alteration of silica materials: an archaeological approach. Tebiwa 17:37–66.Google Scholar
Purdy, Barbara Ann, and Brooks, H. K. 1971 Thermal alteration of silica materials: an archaeological approach. Science 173:322–25.Google Scholar
Quimby, George Irving 1960 Indian life in the upper Great Lakes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. R. 1938 A survival of flake-technique in southern Rhodesia. Man 38:224.Google Scholar
Shippee, J.M. 1963 Was flint annealed before flaking? Plains Anthropologist 8:271–72.Google Scholar
Singer, C, Holmyard, E. J., and Hall, A. R. (Editors) 1956 A history of technology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar