Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:48:09.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Inferences from Decorative Diversity and Interassemblage Distance in Illinois Woodland Ceramic Assemblages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Fraser D. Neiman
Fraser D. Neiman*
Affiliation:
Social Science Statistical Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8208
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Certain aspects of what archaeologists have traditionally called stylistic variation can be understood as the result of the introduction of selectively neutral variation into social-learning populations and the sampling error in the cultural transmission of that variation (drift). Simple mathematical models allow the deduction of expectations for the dynamics of these evolutionary mechanisms as monitored in the archaeological record through assemblage diversity and interassemblage distance. The models are applied to make inferences about the causes of change in decorative diversity and interassemblage distance for Woodland ceramics from Illinois.

Resumen

Resumen

Ciertos aspectos de lo que arqueólogos han tradicionalmente llamado “variación de estilo“ pueden explicarse como el resultado de la introdución de variación selectiva neutral en poblaciones de aprendizaje social, y el error de muestreo en la transmission cultural de variación. Simples modelos matemáticos permiten la deducción de expectativas para la dinámica de estos mecanismos evolutivos controlados en el registro arqueológico a través de la diversidad y la distancia entre conjuntos. Los modelos de los conjuntos artefactuales son utilizados en inferencias sobre las causas del cambio en la diversidad decorativa y la distancia entre conjuntos cerámicos del período Woodland en Illinois.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 7 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bettinger, R. L. 1991 Hunter Gatherers : Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1963 “Red Ochre” Caches from the Michigan Area : A Possible Case of Cultural Drift. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 19 : 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1989 Styles of Style. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8 : 51–67.Google Scholar
Bobrowsky, P. T., and Ball, B. F. 1989 The Theory and Mechanics of Archaeological Diversity in Archaeology. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, R. D. and Jones, G. T., pp. 4–12. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., and Richerson., P. J. 1985 Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1977 Middle Woodland-Early Late Woodland Social Change in the Prehistoric Central Midwestern U. S. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Michigan, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1985 Ceramic Decorative Diversity and Illinois Woodland Regional Integration. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by A. Nelson, Ben, pp. 128–153. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1986 Midwestern Hopewellian Exchange and Supralocal Interaction. In Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, edited by Renfrew, C. and Cherry, J., pp. 117–126. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1990 Selection and Evolution in Nonhierarchical Organization. In The Evolution of Political Systems : Socio-politics in Small-Scale Sedentary Societies, edited by Upham, S., pp. 62–86. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1992 Why Decorate a Pot? Midwestern Household Pottery, 200 B. C. -A. D. 600. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10 : 360–397.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P., and Plog, S. 1982 Evolution of “Tribal” Social Networks : Theory and Prehistoric North American Evidence. American Antiquity 47 : 504–525.Google Scholar
Bunzel, R. 1929 The Pueblo Potter. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Burian, R. M. 1983 Adaptation. In Dimensions of Darwinism, edited by Grene, M., pp. 287–314. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. R. 1964 Interaction Spheres in Prehistory. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by Caldwell, J. R. and Hall, R. L., pp. 133–143. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers 12.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. W. 1981 Cultural Transmission and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Carmelli, D., and Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. 1975 Some Models of Population Structure and Evolution. Theoretical Population Biology 9 : 329–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conkey, M. W., and Hastorf, C. A. 1990 Introduction. In The Uses of Style in Archaeology, edited by Conkey, M. and Hastorf, C., pp. 1–4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. 1987 From Evolution to Behavior : Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link. In The Latest on the Best, Essays on Evolution and Optimality, edited by Dupre, John, pp. 277–306. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F. 1986 Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative and Evolutionary Genetics. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F., and Kimura, M. 1970 An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper Row, New York.Google Scholar
DeBoer, W. R. 1989 Interaction, Imitation, and Communication as Expressed in Style : The Ucayali Experience. In The Uses of Style in Archaeology, edited by Conkey, M. and Hastorf, C., pp. 82–104. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Deetz, J. D. F. 1965 The Dynamics of Stylistic Change in Ankara Ceramics. Illinois Studies in Anthropology 4. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1978 Style and Function : A Fundamental Dichotomy. American Antiquity 43 : 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1980 Evolutionary Theory and Archaeology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 3, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 35–99. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1982 Science, Social Science, and Common Sense : The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 38 : 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1986 Five Decades of American Archaeology. In American Archaeology : Past and Future, edited by D. J., Meltzer, Fowler, D. D. and Sabloff, J. A., pp. 23–49. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1989a Aspects of the Application of Evolutionary Theory in Archaeology. In Archaeological Thought in the Americas, edited by Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., pp. 35–49. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1989b Diversity in Archaeology : A Group of Measures in Search of Application? In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, R. D. and Jones, G. T., pp. 142–149. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1992 Archaeology and Evolutionary Science. In Quandaries and Quests : Visions of Archaeology's Future, edited by Lu Ann, Wansnider, pp. 209–224. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 20.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. 1972 The Sampling Theory of Selectively Neutral Alleles. Theoretical Population Biology 3 : 87–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergen, K. J. 1986 Correspondence vs. Autonomy in the Language of Understanding Human Action. In Metatheory in Social Science, edited by Fiske, D. W. and Schweder, R. A., pp. 136–162. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Grayson, D. K. 1981 The Effects of Sample Size on Some Derived Measures in Vertebrate Faunal Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 8 : 77–88.Google Scholar
Graves, M. W. 1981 Ethnoarchaeology ofKalinga Ceramic Design. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Arizona. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Graves, M. W. 1985 Ceramic Design Within a Kalinga Village : Temporal and Spatial Processes. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B. A., pp. 9–34. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. A., and Jackson, J. E. 1977 Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary 1978 Theory and Value in the Social Sciences. In Action and Interpretation : Studies in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, edited by Hookway, C. and Pettit, P., pp. 1–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hill, J. A. 1966 A Prehistoric Community in Eastern Arizona. Journal of Southwestern Anthropology 22 : 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. A. 1985 Style : A Conceptual Evolutionary Framework. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B. A., pp. 362–388. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1990 Style as Historical Quality. In The Uses of Style in Archaeology, edited by Conkey, M. and Hastorf, C., pp. 44–51. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, G. T., Grayson, D. K., and Beck, C. 1983 Artifact Class Richness and Sample Size in Archaeological Surface Assemblages. In Lulu Linear Punctated : Essays in Honor of George Irving Quimby, edited by Dunnell, R. C. and Grayson, D. K., pp. 55–73. Anthropological Papers No. 72. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Kintigh, K. W. 1984 Measuring Archaeological Diversity by Comparison with Simulated Assemblages. American Antiquity 49 : 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosso, P. 1992 Reading the Book of Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. D. 1989 Resource Specialization, Population Growth, and Agricultural Production in the American Southwest. American Antiquity 54 : 491–503.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. D., and Jones, G. T. 1987 Elements of an Inclusive Evolutionary Model for Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6 : 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, R. D., and Jones, G. T. (eds.) 1989 Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leone, M. B. 1968 Neolithic Economic Autonomy and Social Distance. Science 162 : 1150–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. 1980 Theoretical Population Genetics in the Evo lutionary Synthesis. In The Evolutionary Synthesis, edited by Mayr, E. and Provine, W. B., pp. 58–68. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Longacre, W. A. 1964 Sociological Implications of the Ceramic Analysis. In On the Prehistory of Eastern Arizona, II, pp. 155–167. Fieldiana; Anthropology Vol. 55. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lynch, A., Plunkett, G. M., Baker, A. J., and Jenkins, P. F. 1989 A Model of the Cultural Evolution of Chaffinch Song Derived from the Meme Concept. American Naturalist 133 : 634–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, A., and Baker, A. J. 1993 A Population Memetics Approach to Cultural Evolution in Chaffinch Song : Meme Diversity Within Populations. American Naturalist 141 : 597–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCartney, P. H., and Glass, M. F. 1990 Simulation Models and the Interpretation of Archaeological Diversity. American Antiquity 55 : 521–536.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. J. 1981 A Study of Style and Function in a Class of Tools. Journal of Field Archaeology 8 : 313–326.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. 1990 Thoughtful Foragers, A Study ofPrehistoric Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Neiman, F. D. 1990 An Evolutionary Approach to Archaeological Inference : Aspects of Architectural Variation in the nth-Century Chesapeake. Ph. D. dissertation, Yale University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
O' Brien, M. J., and Holland, T. D. 1990 Variation, Selection, and the Archaeological Record. In Archaeological Method and Theory , vol. 2, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 31–79. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
O' Brien, M. J., and Holland, T. D. 1992 The Role of Adaptation in Archaeological Explanation. American Antiquity 57 : 36–59.Google Scholar
Piazza, A., Rendine, S., Zei, G., Moroni, A., and Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. 1987 Migration Rates of Human Populations from Surname Distributions. Nature 129 : 714–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, C. 1991 Distinguishing Style and Function in Poverty Point Objects. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Plog, S. 1976 Measurement of Prehistoric Interaction Between Communities. In The Early Mesoamerican Village, edited by Flannery, K. V., pp. 255–272. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rindos, D. 1984 The Origins of Agriculture : An Evolutionary Perspective. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. 1988 Does Biology Constrain Culture? American Anthropologist 90 : 819–831.Google Scholar
Rothschild, N. A. 1989 The Effect of Urbanization on Faunal Diversity : A Comparison Between New York City and St. Augustine, Florida, in the Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, R. D. and Jones, G. T., pp. 92–99. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sackett, J. 1982 Approaches to Style in Lithic Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1 : 59–110.Google Scholar
Sackett, J. 1990 Style and Ethnicity in Archaeology. In The Uses of Style in Archaeology, edited by Conkey, M. and Hastorf, C., pp. 32–43. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1962 Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man. In Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, edited by Colodny, R. G., pp. 5–78. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Simpson, E. H. 1949 Measurement of Diversity. Nature 163 : 688.Google Scholar
Smith, C. A. B. 1969 Local Fluctuations in Gene Frequencies. Annals of Human Genetics 32 : 251–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. 1978 Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1980 Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism. Philosophy of Science 47 : 350–383.Google Scholar
Streuver, S. 1964 The Hopewell Interaction Sphere in Riverine-Western-Great Lakes Cultural History. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by Caldwell, J. R. and Hall, R. L., pp. 87–106. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers, Vol. 12.Google Scholar
Tainter, J. A. 1977 Woodland Social Change in West-Central Illinois. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 2 : 67–98.Google Scholar
Teltser, P. A. 1988 The Mississippian Archaeological Record on the Maiden Plain, Southeast Missouri : Local Variability in Evolutionary Perspective. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Michigan. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Teltser, P. A. 1995 Culture History, Evolutionary Theory, and Frequency Seriation. In Evolutionary Archaeology, Methodological Issues, edited by Teltser, P. A., pp. 51–68. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. 1992 The Psychological Foundations of Culture. In The Adapted Mind, Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by Barkow, J., Cosmides, L, and Tooby, J., pp. 19–136. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiessner, P. 1985 Style or Isochrestic Variation? A Reply to Sackett. American Antiquity 50 : 160–166.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. 1990 Is There a Unity to Style? In The Uses of Style in Archaeology, edited by Conkey, M. and Hastorf, C., pp. 105–112. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1989 Matters of Fact and Matters of Interest. In Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity, edited by Shennan, S., pp. 94–108. Allen Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. 1980 Reductionist Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy. In Scientific Discovery : Case Studies, edited by Nickles, T., pp. 213–259. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Wood, J. W. 1986 Convergence of Genetic Distances in a Migration Matrix Model. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 71 : 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, D. E. 1952 Archaeology of the Illinois Valley : 1950. In Archaeology of Eastern North American, edited by Griffin, J. B., pp. 152–164. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Yasuda, N., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Skolnick, M., and Moroni, A. 1974 The Evolution of Surnames : An Analysis of Their Distribution and Extinction. Theoretical Population Biology 5 : 123–142.Google Scholar
Zei, G., Matessi, R. G., Siri, E., Moroni, A., and Cavalli-Sforza, L. 1983 Surnames in Sardinia : Fit of Frequency Distribution for Neutral Alleles and Genetic Population Structure. Annals of Human Genetics 47 : 329–352.Google Scholar