Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-pd9xq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:07:29.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems of Mammal Skull Identification Due to Age Differences in the Dentition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stanley J. Olsen*
Affiliation:
Florida Geological Survey, Tallahassee, Fla.

Abstract

Most keys that are designed for use in identifying mammal skulls discuss and figure the skulls and dentitions of mature adults only. In some groups, particularly carnivores, there is considerable variation from the deciduous teeth of the young to the worn dentitions of the old adult. A series covering this age group, of the North American Raccoon, Procyon lotor is figured and discussed.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glass, B. P. 1951 A Key to the Skulls of North American Mammals. Still-water.Google Scholar
Hall, E. R. 1928 Records of Supernumerary Teeth in Bears. University of California Publications in Zoology, Vol. 30, pp. 245—50. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kurte'n, B. 1955 Sex Dimorphism and Size Trends in the Cave Bear, Vrsus spelaeus. Rosenmuller and Heinroth. Acta Zoologica Fennica, Vol. 90, pp. 148. Helsingfors.Google Scholar
Murie, O. J. 1957 The Elk of North America. The Stackpole Co., Hariisbuig.Google Scholar
Pope, G. W. 1934 Determining the Age of Farm Animals, by Their Teeth. Farmer's Bulletin, No. 1721. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.Google Scholar
Schwartz, C. W. and Schwartz, E. R. 1959 The Wild Mammals of Missouri. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1949 A Fossil Deposit from a Cave in St. Louis. American Museum Novitiates, No. 1408. New York.Google Scholar
Wood, A. E. and Wood, H. E. 1933 The Genetic and Phylogenetic Significance of the Presence of a Third Upper Molar in a Modern Dog. American Midland Naturalist, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 3648. Notre Dame.Google Scholar