Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nt87m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-18T16:15:37.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Inapplicability of “Oriental Despotism” and the “Asiatic Mode of Production” to the Aztecs of Texcoco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jerome A. Offner
Jerome A. Offner*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sanders and Price, Palerm, Carrasco, and others have argued for the utility of the theoretical formulations of "oriental despotism" and the "Asiatic mode of production" for the investigation and comprehension of Aztec political organization and society. Accordingly, it has been claimed that irrigation played an important role in the consolidation of Aztec states, that no significant private property in land existed among the Aztecs, and that government control of the economy was thoroughgoing and complete. All of these theoretically generated positions are demonstrably false, at least for the important Aztec state of Texcoco. Irrigation played no significant role in the origin or consolidation of the Texcocan state; extensive private property in land did exist among the Texcocans, and the government of Texcoco did not at all dominate the Texcocan economy. Marketing was clearly the principal mechanism within the empire for the transference of goods. The basic principles of Aztec society are to be discovered through objective examination of the ethnohistorical and archaeological data and cannot be determined through the imposition of inappropriate or outmoded theoretical formulations.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 43 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Adams, Robert McC. 1974 Anthropological perspectives on ancient trade. Current Anthropology 15(3):239–249.Google Scholar
Anderson, Edgar, and Barlow, R. H. 1943 The maize tribute of Moctezuma's empire. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 30:413–420. St. Louis.Google Scholar
Barlow, R. H. 1949 The extent of the empire of the Culhua Mexica. Ibero-Americana 28. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Barlow, R. H. 1947-1948 La fundación de la triple alianza (1427-1433). Anales del Institute Nacional de Antropologiae Historic. 3:147–155. Mexico.Google Scholar
Borah, Woodrow, and Cook, Sherburne F. 1963 The aboriginal population of central Mexico on the eve of the Spanish conquest. Ibero-Americana 45. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Calnek, Edward E. 1978 El sistema de mercado de Tenochtitlan. In Economfa politico e ideologfa en el Mexico prehispanico, edited by Pedro, Carrasco and Johanna, Broda, pp. 91–114. Centro de Investigaciones Superiores del Institute Nacional de Antropologia e Historia. Editorial Nueva Imagen, Mexico.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro 1971 Social organization of ancient Mexico. In Handbook of Middle American Indians 10, edited by Wauchope, R., pp. 349–375. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro 1978a Introducción. In Estratificacion social en la Mesoamerica prehispanico, by Pedro, Carrasco, Johanna, Broda, et al. , pp. 7–13. Institute Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Centro de Investigaciones Superiores, Mexico.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro 1976b Los linajes nobles del Mexico antiguo. In Estratificación social en la Mesoamerica prehispdnica, by Pedro, Carrasco, Johanna, Broda, et al. , pp. 19–36. Institute Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Centrode Investigaciones Superiores, Mexico.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro 1978 La economia del Mexico prehispanico. In Economfa politico e ideologia en el Mexico prehispdnico, edited by Pedro, Carrasco and Johanna, Broda, pp. 15–76. Centro de Investigaciones Superiores del Institute Nacional de Antropologia e Historia. Editorial Nueva Imagen, Mexico.Google Scholar
Charlton, Thomas 1970 Contemporary agriculture in the Teotihuacan Valley. In The Teotihuacan Valley project. Final report, Vol. 1, pp. 253–348. Occasional Papers in Anthropology 3. Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Clark, James Cooper 1938 Codex Mendoza. The Mexican manuscript known as the Collection of Mendoza and preserved in the Bodleian Library, Oxford. Waterlow & Sons, London.Google Scholar
Cline, Howard F. 1972 The Oztoticpac lands map of Texcoco, 1540. In A la carte: Selected papers on maps and atlases, compiled by Walter, W. Ristow, pp. 5–33. Library of Congress, Washington.Google Scholar
Dibble, Charles E. 1951 Codice Xolotl. Publicaciones del Instituto de Historia, 1st Ser., No. 22. University of Utah and the Universidad Nacional de Mexico, Mexico.Google Scholar
Duran, Fray Diego 1967 Historia de las Indias de Nueva Espaiia e Islas de la Tierra Firme. 2. vols. Editorial Porrua, Mexico.Google Scholar
leyes, Estas son las 1891 Estas son las leyes que tenian los Indios de la Nueva Espafia. In Nueva Co Jeccidn de documentospara la historia de Mexico 3, edited by Joaquin, Garcia Icazbalceta, pp. 308–315. Mexico.Google Scholar
Gibson, Charles 1964 The Aztecs under Spanish rule: A history of the Indians of the Valley of Mexico, 1519-1810. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Guzman, Eulalia 1938 Un manuscrito de la colección de Boturini que trata de los antiguos Sefiores de Teotihuacan. Ethnos 3(4-5):89–103. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Fernando de, Alva 1952 Obras historicas de Don Fernando de Alva Ixtliixochitl publicadas y anotadas por Alfredo Chavero (first ed. 1891-1892). 2 vols. Editors Nacional, Mexico.Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, Paul 1954-1955 Land tenure in ancient Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropo Iógicos 14:351–361.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1966 Pre-capitalist economic formations (first ed. 1857-1858). International Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
McAfee, Byron, and Barlow, Robert H. 1946 The titles of Tetzcotzinco (Santa Maria Nativitas). Tlo Jocan 2(2):110–127. Azcapotzalco, Mexico.Google Scholar
Molina Fabrega, N. 1956 El Codice Mendocino y la economia de Tenochtitlan. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos 14(1):303–335.Google Scholar
Monzon, A. 1949 El calpulli en la organización social de los Tenocha. Publicaciones del Instituto de Historia 1(14). Universidad Nacional Autónoma, Mexico.Google Scholar
Motolinia, Fray Toribio de Benavente, 1903 Memoriales de Fray Toribio de Motolinia, manuscrito de la colecci6n del Sefior Don Joaquin Garcia Icazbalceta. Documentos históricos de Mejico, Vol. 1, edited by Luis Garcia, Pimentel. Mexico, Paris, and Madrid.Google Scholar
Murdock, George Peter 1957 Review of “Oriental Despotism: A comparative study of total power. ” American Anthropologist 59:545–547.Google Scholar
Offner, Jerome A. 1979 Law and politics in Aztec Texcoco. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Yale University.Google Scholar
O'Gorman, Edmundo (editor) 1975 Obras hist6ricas de Fernando de Alva Ixtliixochitl. Serie de Historiadores y Cronistas de Indias. Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey 1971 Prehistoric settlement patterns in the Texcoco region, Mexico. Memoirs of the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, No. 3.Google Scholar
Pomar, Juan Bautista 1891 Relaci6n de Texcoco. In Nueva colección de documentos para la historia de Mexico 3, edited by Joaquin, Garcia Icazbalceta, pp. 1–69. Mexico.Google Scholar
Pospisil, Leopold 1971 Anthropology of law: A comparative theory. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Sanders, William T. 1970 The population of the Teotihuacan Valley, the basin of Mexico and the central Mexican symbioticregion in the sixteenth century. In The Teotihuacan Valley project. Final report, Vol. 1, pp. 386–456. Occasional Papers in Anthropology 3. Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Sanders, William T., and Price, Barbara J. 1968 Mesoamerica. The evolution of a civilization. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Torquemada, Fray Juan de 1975 Monarqufa indiana. Introducción por Miguel León-Portilla. Biblioteca Porrua, Vols. 41-43 (first ed.Google Scholar
Torquemada, Fray Juan de 1969, facsimile of a 1723 ed. , Madrid). 3 vols. Porrua, Mexico. Fonds Mexicains 243. Bibliotheque Nationals de Paris, France.Google Scholar
Vaillant, George C. 1961 The Aztecs of Mexico (first ed. 1950, original ed. Doubleday, Doran & Co. 1940). Penguin Books, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Voytia, Mariano Fernandez de Echeverria 1944 Historia antigua de Mexico. Editorial Leyenda, Mexico.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl A. 1957 Oriental despotism: A comparative study of total power. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1959 Sons of the shaking earth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. and Palerm, Angel 1955 Irrigation in the Old Acolhua domain, Mexico. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11(3):265–281.Google Scholar
Zorita, Alonso de 1891 Breve y sumaria relaci6n de los seiiores, y maneras y diferencias que habia de ellos en la Nueva Espana. In Nueva colecci6n de documentos para la historia de Mexico 3, edited by Joaquin, Garcia Icazbalceta, pp. 71–227. Mexico.Google Scholar