Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:23:39.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canavalia Beans in American Prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jonathan Sauer  and
Lawrence Kaplan
Jonathan Sauer
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, California
Lawrence Kaplan
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The naturally pantropical genus Canavalia is the source of four domesticated species, of which C. plagiosperma and C. ensiformis evidently evolved under aboriginal New World cultivation. Their exact origins are uncertain because the archaeological record is concentrated in dry regions where they arrived as irrigated crops. Prehistoric cultivation of C. plagiosperma is known only from coastal Peru where it has been grown continuously for at least 4,000 years. The earliest secure record of C. ensiformis is from about A.D. 900 in Oaxaca, but charred seeds from about 300 B.C. in Yucatan probably belong to this species. Later archaeological records of C. ensiformis are available from a few Arizona sites and from Peruvian sites occupied in the early Colonial period. Canavalia and Phaseolus beans are generally associated in prehistoric cultures. Since the latter are rated as superior food, the role of Canavalia is puzzling. Meager historical and ethnographic evidence offers few clues.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 417 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohrer, Vorsila L. 1962 Nature and Interpretation of Ethnobotanical Materials from Tonto National Monument. In “Archeological Studies at Tonto National Monument, Arizona,” edited by L. R. Caywood, pp. 75–114. Southwestern Monuments Association, Technical Series, Vol. 2. Gila Pueblo.Google Scholar
Bukasov, S. M. 1930 The Cultivated Plants of Mexico, Guatemala, and Columbia. Bulletin of Applied Botany, of Genetics and Plant-Breeding (Trudy po prikladnoi botanike, genetike i selektsii), Supplement 47 (Russian, pp. 1–469; English summary, pp. 470–553). Leningrad.Google Scholar
Buse, H. 1965 Introductión al Perú. Imprenta del Colegio Militar Leoncio Prado, Lima.Google Scholar
Castetter, E. F. and Bell, W. H. 1942 Pima and Papago Indian Agriculture. University of New Mexico, Inter-Americana Studies, Vol. I, pp. 1–245. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. and others 1967 Farming Systems and Political Growth in Ancient Oaxaca. Science, Vol. 158, No. 3800, pp. 445–54. Washington.Google Scholar
Friedbero, Claudine 1958 Contribution á l’etude ethnobotanique des tombes précolombiennes de Lauri (Pérou). Journal d’Agriculture Tropicale et de Botanique Appliquée, Vol. 5, Nos. 6–7, pp. 397–428. Paris.Google Scholar
Harms, H. Von 1922 Obersicht der bisher in altperuanischen Gräbern gefundenen Pflanzenreste. In Festschrift Eduard Seler, edited by W. Lehmann, pp. 157–86. Strecker und Schröder, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1956 The Cultivated Beans of the Prehistoric Southwest. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 189–251. St. Louis.Google Scholar
L’Ecluse, C. de 1605 Exoticarum libri decern, Vol. 3. Plantiniana Raphelengij, Antwerp.Google Scholar
Lowie, R. H. 1948 The Tropical Forests: An Introduction. In “Handbook of South American Indians,” edited by J. H. Steward, Vol. 3, pp. 1–56. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 143. Washington.Google Scholar
Macfadyen, J. 1837 The Flora of Jamaica, Vol. 1. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1964a Ancient Mesoamerican Civilization. Science, Vol. 143, No. 3606, pp. 531–7. Washington.10.1126/science.143.3606.531 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNeish, R. S. 1964b The Origins of New World Civilization. Scientific American, Vol. 211, No. 5, pp. 29–37. New York.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1967 A Summary of the Subsistence. In The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, edited by D. S. Byers, Vol. 1, pp. 290–309. University of Texas Press, Austin and London.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. H. and Menzel, Dorothy 1967 Peruvian Archaeology: Selected Readings. Peek, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1964 Revision of Canavalia. Brittonia, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 106–81. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Sloane, Sir Hans 1696 Catalogus Plantarum quae in Insula Jamaica sponte proveniunt, Vol. 1. D. Brown, London.Google Scholar
Sloane, Sir Hans 1707 A Voyage to the Islands Madera, Barbados, Nieves, S. Christophers and Jamaica with the Natural History, Vol. 1. British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Towle, Margaret A. 1952 Descriptions and Identifications of the Virú Plant Remains. In Cultural Stratigraphy in the Virú Valley, Northern Peru, the Formative and Florescent Epochs, by W. D. Strong, Appendix 2, pp. 352–6. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Towle, Margaret A. 1961 The Ethnobotany of Pre-Columbian Peru. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 30. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Trautman, M. A. and Walton, A. 1962 Isotopes, Inc. Radiocarbon Measurements II. American Journal of Science, Radiocarbon, Vol. 4, pp. 35–42. New Haven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, T. W. and Bird, J. B. 1949 Identification and Significance of the Cucurbit Materials from Huaca Prieta, Peru. American Museum Novitates, No. 1426, pp. 1–15. New York.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W., Cutler, H. C., and Macneish, R. S. 1957 Cucurbit Materials from Three Caves near Ocampo, Tamaulipas. American Antiquity, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 352–8. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Yacovleff, E. and Herrera, F. L. 1934 El mundo vegetal de los antiguos peruanos. Revista del Museo National del Perú, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 243–323. Lima.Google Scholar