Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:56:51.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ancient Town and City Sites: A View from the Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Arlene Miller Rosen
Arlene Miller Rosen*
Affiliation:
Israel Department of Antiquities, Archaeological Division, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer Sheva 84 105 Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological studies concerned with reconstructing activity areas, room functions, and site-formation processes can benefit greatly from analyses of the microartifacts found on and within occupation surfaces. These remains are often primary refuse directly related to activities, and can be used to identify such locations as food-preparation areas, flint-knapping stations, and storage facilities. In addition, certain microartifacts are informative about site-formation processes. For example, the grain-size distribution of charcoal may be indicative of primary vs. secondary refuse, high percentages of corroded and crushed bone from scavenger feces may indicate locations of secondary refuse, and many small sherds could point to heavily trampled areas. A case study from the Iron Age city site of Tel Miqne-Ekron in central Israel demonstrates the use of microarchaeology at a complex sedentary site.

Résumé

Résumé

Los estudios arqueológicos interesados en la reconstrucción de áreas de actividades, funciones de lugares, y procesos de formación de sitios, pueden verse profundamentes beneficiados por el análisis de microartefactos hallados sobre y entre las superficies de ocupación. Estos restos son a menudo deshechos primarios relacionados directamente con actividades, y pueden ser utilizados para identificar dichos sitios como áreas de preparacion de alimentos, estaciones de lascado depedernal, o instalaciones de almacenamiento. Además, ciertos microartefactos constituyen fuentes de información sobre el proceso de formación del sitio. Por ejemplo, la distribución de granos de carbon por tamaño puede indicar deshechos primarios o secundarios, altos porcentajes de huesos corroidos y triturados en las heces de comedores de carroña pueden indicar la ubicación de deshechos secundarios, y gran cantidad de pequeños fragmentos podrián señalar áreas abundantemente holladas. Un caso de la Edad del Hierro estudiado en Tel Miqne-Ekron en la zona central de Israel, demuestra la aplicación de la microarqueología en un sitio complejo y sedentario.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 1989 , pp. 564 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Binford, L. R. 1982 The Archaeology of Place. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, P., FedorofF, N., Jungerius, A., Stoops, G., and Tursina, T. 1985 Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description. Waine Research, Wolverhampton, England.Google Scholar
Butzer, K. W. 1982 Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S. F., and Treganza, A. E. 1947 The Quantitative Investigations of Aboriginal Sites: Comparative Physical and Chemical Analysis of Two California Indian Mounds. American Antiquity 13: 135–142.Google Scholar
Deal, M. 1985 Household Pottery Disposal in the Maya Highlands: An Ethnoarchaeological Interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4: 243–291.Google Scholar
Dothan, T., and Gitin, S. 1985 Notes and News: Tel Miqne, 1984. Israel Exploration Journal 35: 67–71.Google Scholar
Fladmark, K. R. 1982 Microdebitage Analysis: Initial Considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science 9: 205–220.Google Scholar
Gifford, D. P. 1978 Ethnoarchaeological Observations of Natural Processes Affecting Cultural Materials. In Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, edited by Gould, R. P., pp. 77–101. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Gitin, S. 1989 Tel Miqne-Ekron: A Type Site for the Inner Coastal Plain in the Iron II Period. In Recent Excavations in Israel: Studies in Iron Age Archaeology, edited by Gitin, S. and Dever, W. G., pp. 15–58. Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research Vol. 49. Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Halstead, P., Hodder, I., and Jones, G. 1978 Behavioral Archaeology and Refuse Patterns: A Case Study. Norwegian Archaeological Review 11: 118—131.Google Scholar
Hassan, F. A. 1978 Sediments in Archaeology: Methods and Implications for Palaeoenvironmental and Cultural Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 5: 197—213.Google Scholar
Hausenbuiller, R. L. 1972 Soil Science, Principles and Practices. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa.Google Scholar
Hayden, B., and Cannon, A. 1983 Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2: 117–163.Google Scholar
Hesse, B., and Rosen, A. 1987 The Detection of Chronological Mixing in Samples from Stratified Archaeological Sites. In Recent Developments in Environmental Analysis in Old and New World Archaeology, edited by Webb, R. E., pp. 117—129. BAR International Series 416. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hull, K. L. 1987 Identification of Cultural Site Formation Processes Through Microdebitage Analysis. American Antiquity 52: 772–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, S. 1984 A nalyzing Activity A reas: An Eth noarchaeological Study of the Use of Space. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Kirkby, A., and Kirkby, M. J. 1976 Geomorphic Processes and the Surface Survey of Archaeological Sites in Semi-Arid Areas. In Geoarchaeolagy: Earth Science and the Past, edited by Davidson, D. A. and Shackley, M. L., pp. 229–253. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. 1982 Village Ethnoarchaeology: Rural Iran in Archaeological Perspective. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Levy, T. E., and Holl, A. 1987 Theory and Practice in Household Archaeology: A Case Study from the Chalcolithic Village at Shiqmim. In Shiqmim I: Studies Concerning Chalcolithic Societies in the Northern Negev Desert, Israel (1982-1984), edited by Levy, T. E., pp. 373–410. BAR International Series 356. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
O. Connell, J. F. 1987 Alyawara Site Structure and its Archaeological Implications. American Antiquity 52: 74–108.Google Scholar
Rapp, G. Jr., 1975 The Archaeological Field Staff: The Geologist. Journal of Field Archaeology 2: 229–237.Google Scholar
Redman, C. L. 1987 Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective. American Antiquity 52: 249–265.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. M. 1986 Cities of Clay: The Geoarcheology of Tells. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. A. 1984 The Adoption of Metallurgy in the Levant: A Lithic Perspective. Current Anthropology 24: 504–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1972 Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity 37: 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1976 Behavioral Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1983 Toward the Identification of Formation Processes. American Antiquity 48: 675–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, D., and Schiffer, M. B. 1987 A Preliminary Analysis of Pithouse Assemblages from Snaketown, Arizona. In Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach, edited by Kent, S., pp. 549–603. Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Siegel, P. E., and Roe, P. G. 1986 Shipibo Archaeo-Ethnography: Site Formation Processes and Archaeological Interpretation. World Archaeology 18: 96–115.Google Scholar
Wilk, R., and Schiffer, M. B. 1979 The Archaeology of Vacant Lots in Tucson, Arizona. American Antiquity 44: 530–536.Google Scholar
Yellen, J. E. 1977 Cultural Patterning in Faunal Remains: Evidence from the !Kung Bushmen. In Experimental Archaeology, edited by Ingersoll, D., Yellen, J. E., and Mac Donald, W., pp. 271–331. Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar