Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:32:40.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Position of Ipiutak in Eskimo Culture —Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Henry B. Collins
Henry B. Collins*
Affiliation:
Smithsonian InstitutionWashington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The greater part of Larsen's paper is a restatement of the Ipiutak theory rather than a reply to my two specific criticisms. I feel that this theory is based on a series of questionable assumptions rather than facts, but as Larsen properly insists on “sound scientific documentation and not mere statements” I will not attempt to discuss the theory as a whole in the space available here but refer to a recent publication which gives my views (Collins, 1954, pp. 78-85). The second half of Larsen's paper deals for the most part with the second of the two points I raised, the relationship of the Ipiutak and Old Bering Sea cultures. This is a crucial point for the Ipiutak theory, for if I am correct the type culture of the “palae-Eskimo” complex, from the evidence of both archaeology and radiocarbon dating, is later than cultures assigned to the “neo-Eskimo” complex and also more closely related to them than to other “palae-Eskimo” cultures.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , July 1954 , pp. 79 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BLOCH, O. 1932. Developments in Infra-Red Photography. Photographic Journal, Vol. 72, pp. 287–88.Google Scholar
CLARK, WALTER 1946. Photography by Infrared. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
HAXTHAUSEN, H. 1933. Infrarotes’ ,Photographieren in der Dermatologie. Dermatologisches Wochschrift, Vol. 97, pp. 1289–92.Google Scholar
IVES, R. L. 1939, Infra-red Photography as an Aid in Ecological Surveys. Ecology, Vol. 20, pp. 433–39.Google Scholar
OBATAN, F. 1941. Sur la Reflexion du proche Infrarouge par les Surfaces Vegetales. Compte Rendue, Vol. 212, pp. 621–3.Google Scholar
ROWE, JOHN H. 1953. Technical Aids in Anthropology. In Anthropology Today, pp. 895–940. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
SELIGMAN, G. C. 1934. Infra-Red Photographs of Racial Types. Nature, Vol. 133, pp. 279–80.Google Scholar
SMITH, GUY D. 1942. Illinois Loess. University of Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 490.Google Scholar
SPUHLER, JAMES 1950. Genetics of Three Normal Morphological Variations: Patterns of Superficial Veins of the Anterior Thorax, Peroneus Tertius Muscle, and Number of Vallate Papillae. Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Vol. 15, pp. 175–89, Cold Spring Harbor.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, H. J. 1933. The Transmission of Infra-Red Radiation by a Thin Layer of Horn. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Section A, Vol. 142, pp. 598–605.Google Scholar