Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:35:15.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Use of the Concept of Area Co-Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2021

Irving Rouse
Irving Rouse*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut May, 1953
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1947, at a conference on Peruvian archaeology held in Viking Fund headquarters in New York City, Wendell C. Bennett proposed a concept of area co-tradition and used it as a means of expressing certain characteristics of Peruvian culture history. He first defined the concept in abstract terms, then described the Peruvian co-tradition, and finally suggested the possibility that other area co-traditions might exist in the Southwestern United States, Middle America, and Northwest Argentina (Bennett, 1948).

Acting on Bennett's suggestion, Martin and Rinaldo (1951) subsequently worked out a Southwestern area Co-tradition in some detail. In addition, Willey (1953, p. 374) has suggested the existence of an Arctic or Eskimo cotradition and of three co-traditions in the Eastern United States: Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi.

In the present paper, I shall confine myself to the use of the concept in Peru and the Southwest, since these are the only places where it has yet been applied in any detail.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 221 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, Wendell C. 1948. The Peruvian Co-Tradition. In “A Reappraisal of Peruvian Archaeology,” Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 4, PP. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Wendell C. and Bird, Junius B. 1949. Andean Culture History. Handbook Series, American Museum of Natural History, No. 15.Google Scholar
Colton, H. S. 1941. Prehistoric Trade in the Southwest. Scientific Monthly, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 308–19.Google Scholar
Foster, George M. 1953. What is Folk Culture? American Anthropologist, n.s., Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Paul S. and Rinaldo, John B. 1951. The Southwestern Co-Tradition. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 215–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Erik K. 1951. Cultural Areas of the Pre-Spanish Southwest. New Mexico Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 428–39.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving 1951. Areas and Periods of Culture in the Greater Antilles. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 248–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, Julian H. 1948. A Functional-Developmental Classification of American High Cultures. In “A Reappraisal of Peruvian Archaeology,” Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 4, pp. 103–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, Julian H. 1949. Cultural Causality and Law: a Trial Formulation of the Development of Early Civilizations. American Anthropologist, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1945. Horizon Styles and Pottery Traditions in Peruvian Archaeology. American Antiquity, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1950. Growth Trends in New World Cultures. In For the Dean: Essays in Anthropology in Honor of Byron Cummings, pp. 223–47. Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1953. Archeological Theories and Interpretation: New World. In Anthropology Today, an Encyclopedic Inventory, pp. 361–85.Google Scholar