Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:10:06.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do Cucurbita pepo Gourds Float Fishnets?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John P. Hart
Affiliation:
Research and Collections Division, New York State Museum, 3140 Cultural Education Center, Albany, NY 12230 ([email protected])
Robert A. Daniels
Affiliation:
Research and Collections Division, New York State Museum, 3140 Cultural Education Center, Albany, NY 12230 ([email protected])
Charles J. Sheviak
Affiliation:
Research and Collections Division, New York State Museum, 3140 Cultural Education Center, Albany, NY 12230 ([email protected])

Abstract

Among the various pre-maize indigenous crops of eastern North America, Cucurbita pepo gourd is the most enigmatic. C. pepo gourd remains have been found on mid-Holocene (8000–4000 B.P.) archaeological sites as far north and east as Maine. Their presumably extremely bitter flesh would have made the fruits inedible. Two not mutually exclusive hypotheses for use of the fruit are currently being debated: (1) the nutritious seeds were processed to remove bitterness and consumed, and (2) dried fruits were used as fishnet floats and/or containers for general use. We report on a series of experiments that demonstrate the gourds function extremely well as fishnet floats. These results lend support to the second hypothesis, but do not conclusively prove they were used for this purpose.

Resumen

Resumen

El caso de la calabaza Cucurbita pepo es uno de los más enigmáticos entre los diferentes tipos de vegetales autóctonos utilizados en el este de América del Norte con anterioridad al maíz. Se han encontrado restos de calabaza C. pepo en sitios arqueológicos a lo largo del Holoceno Medio (8000–4000 B.P.) llegando este tipo de evidencia tan al este y norte como en el Estado de Maine. Se piensa que es probable que si lapulpa de la calabaza de C. pepo era muy amarga, la misma no hay a sido comestible. En la actualidad, el debate del posible uso de la calabaza tiene dos hipótesis no excluyentes: (1) sus semillas nutritivas fueron procesadas afin de extraerles su sabor amargo y así poder consumirlas, y (2) las calabazas desecadas fueron empleadas como flotadores en redes de pesca y/o recipientes de uso genérico. Aquí damos a conocer una serie de experimentos en los que demostramos que las calabazas funcionan extremadamente bien como flotadores en redes de pesca. Estos resultados permiten sustentar más la segunda hipótesis pero, sin embargo, no demuestran de manera incuestionable que se las utilizara únicamente con este fin.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Asch, David L. 1994 Aboriginal Specialty-Plant Cultivation in Eastern North America: Illinois Prehistory and A Post-Contact Perspective. In Agricultural Origins and Development in the Midcontinent , edited by William, Green, pp. 2586. Report 19. Office of the State Archaeologist, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
Asch, David L. 1995 Aboriginal Specialty-Plant Propagation: Illinois Prehistory and an Eastern North American Post-Contact Perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Asch, David L., and Nancy B., Asch 1985 Prehistoric Plant Cultivation in West-Central Illinois. In Prehistoric Food Production in North America , edited by Richard, I. Ford, pp. 149204. Anthropological Papers 75. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Brown, James A., and Robert K., Vierra 1983 What Happened in the Middle Archaic? An Introduction to an Ecological Approach to Koster Site Archaeology. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by James, L. Phillips and James, A. Brown, pp. 165195. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cleland, Charles E. 1982 The Inland Shore Fishery of the Northern Great Lakes: Its Development and Importance in Prehistory. American Antiquity 47:761784.Google Scholar
Cowan, C. Wesley 1997 Evolutionary Changes Associated with the Domestication of Cucurbita pepo: Evidence from Eastern Kentucky. In People, Plants, and Landscapes: Studies in Paleoethnobotany, edited by Kristen, J. Gremillion, pp. 6385. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Cowan, C. Wesley, and Bruce, D. Smith 1993 New Perspectives on a Wild Gourd in Eastern North America. Journal of Ethnobiology 13:1754.Google Scholar
Cushing, Frank Hamilton 1896 Exploration of Ancient Key-Dwellers Remains on the Gulf Coast of Florida. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 25:329 448, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Cutler, Hugh C. 1975 Two Kinds of Gourds from Key Marco. In The Material Culture of Key Marco, Florida, edited by Marion, Spjut Gilliland, pp. 255256. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Decker-Walters, Dena S., Jack, E. Staub, Sang-Min, Chung, Eijiro, Nakata, and Hector, D. Quemada 2002 Diversity in Free-living Populations of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) as Assessed by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA. Systematic Botany 27:1828.Google Scholar
Decker-Walters, Dena S., Terrence, W. Walters, C. Wesley, and Bruce, D. Smith 1993 Isozymic Characterization of Wild Populations of Cucurbita pepo. Journal of Ethnobiology 13:5572.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard I. 1981 Gardening and Farming Before A.D. 1000: Patterns of Prehistoric Cultivation North of Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 1:627.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard I. 1985 Patterns of Prehistoric Food Production in North America. In Prehistoric Food Production in North America, edited by Richard, I. Ford, pp. 341364. Anthropological Papers 75, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gayle J. 1990 Multiple Pathways to Farming in Precontact Eastern North America. Journal of World Prehistory 4:387435.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gayle J. 1999 Gender and the Early Cultivation of Gourds in Eastern North America. American Antiquity 64:417429.Google Scholar
Gilliland, Marion Spjut 1975 The Material Culture of Key Marco Florida. The University Presses of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Hart, John P. 1999 Maize Agriculture Evolution in the Eastern Woodlands of North America: A Darwinian Perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 6:137180.Google Scholar
Hart, John P., and Nancy, Asch Sidell 1997 Additional Evidence for Early Cucurbit Use in the Northern Eastern Woodlands East of the Allegheny Front. American Antiquity 62:523537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Murray L. 1983 Active Fish Capture Methods. In Fishery Techniques, edited by Larry, A. Nielsen and David, L. Johnson, pp. 123145. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
Hubert, Wayne A. 1983 Passive Capture Techniques. In Fishery Techniques, edited by Larry, A. Nielsen and David, L. Johnson, pp. 95111. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
King, Frances B. 1985 Early Cultivated Cucurbits in Eastern North America. In Prehistoric Food Production in North America, edited by Richard, I. Ford, pp. 7398. Anthropological Papers 75. Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Kinietz, W. Vernon 1940 The Indians of the Western Great Lakes. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Lagler, Karl F. 1978 Capture, Sampling and Examination of Fishes. In Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters, edited by Timothy, Bagenal, pp. 747. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Newsom, Lee A., David Webb, S., and James, S. Dunbar 1993 History and Geographic Distribution of Cucurbita pepo Gourds in Florida. Journal of Ethnobiology 13:7597.Google Scholar
Parker, Arthur C. 1910 Iroquois Uses of Maize and Other Plant Foods. New York State Museum Bulletin 144. The University of the State of New York, Albany.Google Scholar
Petersen, James B., and Nancy, Asch Sidell 1996 Mid-Holocene Evidence of Cucurbita sp. from Central Maine, American Antiquity 61:685698.Google Scholar
Prentice, Guy 1986 Origins of Plant Domestication in the Eastern United States: Promoting the Individual in Archaeological Theory. Southeastern Archaeology 5:103119.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. W., and Decker-Walters, D. S. 1996 Cucurbits. CAB International, New York.Google Scholar
Russo, Michael, Barbara, A. Purdy, Lee, A. Newsom, and Ray, M. McGee 1992 A Reinterpretation of Late Archaic Adaptations in Central-East Florida: Groves’ Orange Midden (8-Vo-2601). Southeastern Archaeology 11:95108.Google Scholar
Sanjur, Oris I., Dolores, R. Piperno, Thomas, C. Andres, and Linda, Wessel-Beaver 2002 Phylogenetic Relationships among Domesticated and Wild Species of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) Inferred from a Mitocondrial Gene: Implications for Crop Plant Evolution and Areas of Origin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:535540. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. 1987 The Independent Domestication of Indigenous Seed Bearing Plants in Eastern North America. In Emergent Horticultural Economies of the Eastern Woodlands , edited by William, F. Keegan, pp. 347. Occasional Papers No. 7. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. 1992 Rivers of Change: Essays on Early Agriculture in Eastern North America, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D., Wesley Cowan, C., and Michael, P. Hoffman 1992 Is It an Indigene or Foreigner? In Rivers of Change: Essays on Early Agriculture in Eastern North America, by Bruce, D. Smith, pp. 67100. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Speck, Frank G. 1941 Gourds of the Southeastern Indians: A Prolegomenon on the Lagenaria Gourd in the Culture of the Southeastern Indians. The New England Gourd Society, Boston. Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W. 1986 Aquatic Exploitation in the Lower Illinois River Valley: The Role of Paleoecological Changes. In Foraging, Collecting, and Harvesting: Archaic Period Subsistence and Settlement in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Sarah, W. Neusius, pp. 145174. Occasional Papers No. 6. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W. 1994 The Value of Archaeological Faunal Remains for Paleodietary Reconstruction: A Case Study for the Midwestern United States. In Paleonutrition: The Diet and Health of Prehistoric Americans, edited by Kristin, D. Sobolik, pp. 3454. Occasional Papers No. 22. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Swanton, John R. 1946 The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 137. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Yarnell, Richard A. 1993 The Importance of Native Crops During the Late Archaic and Woodland Periods. In Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Margaret Scarry, C., pp. 1326. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.Google Scholar