Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:15:22.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The illusion of tacit knowledge as the great problem in the development of product configurators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

Anders Haug
Anders Haug*
Affiliation:
Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship Management, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
*
Reprint requests to: Anders Haug, Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship Management, University of Southern Denmark Engstien 1, 6000 Kolding, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many cases, the use of product configurators provides a number of benefits for engineering-oriented companies, such as shorter lead times, the use of fewer man hours, and improved product quality. However, not all of these projects are successful. The task of defining what should be implemented into the configurator is much more complex than anticipated in many configurator projects. In the worst-case scenario, this implies that the configurator is never fully developed or it fails to support the users in a satisfactory manner. The difficulties in creating adequate specifications of what to implement in the knowledge base of a configurator have been explained in much of the configuration literature by the assumption that much of the relevant knowledge of the product experts is tacit. However, this paper shows that this kind of explanation can be misleading and may even be incorrect. This is accomplished by discussing the problems inherent in such explanations and through interviews with configuration project knowledge engineers. Therefore, according to this basis, this paper provides general recommendations concerning the use of the term tacit knowledge and outlines issues related to the acquisition of product knowledge in configuration projects.

Keywords

Knowledge AcquisitionKnowledge EngineeringKnowledge ManagementProduct ConfigurationTacit Knowledge
Type
Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 25 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ardissono, L., Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Goy, A., Jannach, D., Petrone, G., Schäfer, R., & Zanker, M. (2003). A framework for the development of personalized, distributed web-based configuration systems. AI Magazine 24(3), 93–108.Google Scholar
Bernecker, S., & Dretske, F. (2000). Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism—A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 3rd ed.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cawsey, A. (1998). The Essence of Artificial Intelligence. Harlow: Prentice–Hall.Google Scholar
Clancey, W.J. (1993). The knowledge level reinterpreted: modelling socio-technical systems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 8(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H.M. (2001). Tacit knowledge, trust, and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science 31(1), 71–85.Google Scholar
Cook, S.D.N., & Brown, J.S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10(4), 381–400.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Seidel, R., Seidel, M., & Shahbazpour, M. (2009). Design communication for mass customisation. International Journal of Mass Customisation 3(2), 146–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, K., Hvam, L., Pedersen, J.L., Møldrup, M., & Møller, N. (2005). Udvikling og implementering af konfigureringssystemer: Økonomi, Teknologi og Organisation (Final report from PETO research project). Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
Edwards, K., & Ladeby, K. (2005). Framework for assessing configuration readiness. Proc. 3rd Interdisciplinary World Congr. Mass Customization and Personalization (MCPC2005) [CD].Google Scholar
Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., & Jannach, D. (2000). UML as domain specific language for the construction of knowledge-based configuration systems. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 10(4), 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Jannach, D., Stumptner, M., & Zanker, M. (2002). Acquiring configuration knowledge bases in the semantic web using UML. LNAI, Vol. 2473, pp. 352–357. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Fleischanderl, G. (1999). Overview of configurators as effective tools for corporate knowledge management. Proc. 16th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence, AAAI ‘99 Workshop on Configuration, pp. 110–113.Google Scholar
Forza, C., & Salvador, F. (2002). Managing for variety in the order acquisition and fulfilment process: the contribution of product configuration systems. International Journal of Production Economics 76(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forza, C., & Salvador, F. (2007). Product Information Management for Mass Customization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frutos, J.D., Santos, E.R., & Borenstein, D. (2004). Decision support system for product configuration in mass customization environments. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications 12(2), 131–144.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (2002). Knowledge Management Foundations. Boston: Butterworth–Heinemann.Google Scholar
Gettier, E. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis 23(6), 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourlay, S.N. (2006). Towards conceptual clarity concerning tacit knowledge: a review of empirical studies. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 4(1), 60–69.Google Scholar
Grant, R.M. (1996). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(1), 109–122.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, B. (2001). Vidensfilosofi [Philosophy of Knowledge]. (Hansen, I.B., Trans.). Aarhus, Denmark: Klim.Google Scholar
Hansen, B.L. (2003). Development of industrial variant specification systems. PhD thesis. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management.Google Scholar
Haug, A., & Hvam, L. (2007). A comparative study of two graphical notations for the development of product configuration systems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering 14(2), 107–116.Google Scholar
Heiskala, M., Paloheimo, K.-S., & Tiihonen, J. (2005). Mass customization of services: benefits and challenges of configurable services. Proc. Frontiers of e-Business Research (FeBR), pp. 206–221.Google Scholar
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., & Lee, H. (2000). Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17(3), 231–246.Google Scholar
Hopgood, A.A. (2000). Intelligent Systems for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd ed.London: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hvam, L. (2004). A multi-perspective approach for the design of product configuration systems—an evaluation of industry applications. Proc. Int. Conf. Economic, Technical and Organisational Aspects of Product Configuration Systems, pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
Hvam, L., & Malis, M. (2001). A knowledge based documentation tool for configuration projects. Proc. World Congr. Mass Customization and Personalization [CD].Google Scholar
Hvam, L., Mortensen, N.H., & Riis, J. (2008). Product Customization. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
Hvam, L., Pape, S., & Nielsen, M.K. (2006). Improving the quotation process with product configuration. Computers in Industry 57(7), 607–621.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. (1999). Introduction to Expert Systems, 3rd ed.Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.Google Scholar
Møldrup, M., & Møller, N. (2004). Development and implementation of product configuration systems—a change management perspective. Proc. Int. Conf. Economic, Technical and Organisational Aspects of Product Configuration Systems, pp. 45–57.Google Scholar
Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2002). Managing Knowledge Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A.P., & Hvam, L. (2007). Industrializing engineering work: challenges associated with the implementation of product models. Proc. PICMET, pp. 1934–1943.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review 69(6), 96–104.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning 33(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J.L., & Edwards, K. (2004). Product configuration systems and productivity. Proc. Int. Conf. Economic, Technical and Organisational Aspects of Product Configuration Systems, pp. 165–176.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being. In Knowing and Being (Grene, M., Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1983). The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith Inc.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (2002). Personal Knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1984). The Concept of the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sabin, D., & Weigel, R. (1998). Product configuration frameworks—a survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 13(4), 42–49.Google Scholar
Sandberg, M., Johnsson, H., & Larsson, T. (2008). Knowledge-based engineering in construction: the prefabricated timber housing case. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 13, 408–420.Google Scholar
Schwarze, S., & Schönsleben, P. (1996). Recent developments in configuration of multiple-variant products: application orientation and vagueness in customer requirements. Proc. Int. Conf. Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS’96), pp. 243–254.Google Scholar
Skjevdal, R., & Idsoe, E.A. (2005). The competitive impact of product configurators in mass tailoring and mass customization companies. Proc. 3rd Interdisciplinary World Congr. Mass Customization and Personalization (MCPC2005) [CD].Google Scholar
Soininen, T., Tiihonen, J., Mäannistö, T., & Sulonen, R. (1998). Towards a general ontology of configuration. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 12(4), 357–372.Google Scholar
Speel, P.-H., Schreiber, A., Joolingen, W., & Beijer, G. (2001). Conceptual models for knowledge-based systems. In Encyclopaedia of Computer Science and Technology (Kent, A., & Williams, J.G., Eds.), Vol. 44. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Spender, J.-C. (1998). Pluralist epistemology and the knowledge-based theory of the firm. Organization 5(2), 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenmark, D. (2002). Information vs. knowledge: the role of intranets in knowledge management. Proc. 35th Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences (HICSS-35), pp. 104–110.Google Scholar
Studer, R., Benjamins, V.R., & Fensel, D. (1998). Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering 25(1–2), 161–197.Google Scholar
Suistoranta, S. (2000). Structured sales process for configuration. Proc. 5th WDK Workshop on Product Structuring, pp. 49–63. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
Tiihonen, J., Lehtonen, T., Soininen, T., Pulkkinen, A., Sulonen, R., & Riitahuhta, A. (1998). Modeling configurable product families. Proc. 4th WDK Workshop on Product Structuring, pp. 1139–1142.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (2003). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M.A., Eds.), pp. 410–427. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies 38(7), 973–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiig, K.M. (2004). Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking About Thinking—How People and Organizations Create, Represent, and Use Knowledge. Arlington, TX: Schema Press.Google Scholar
Zhelka, E. (2005). RAPIDS: how a manufacturer achieved speed to market with their online product configuration system. Proc. Engineering Management Conf., Vol. 2, pp. 490–493.Google Scholar