Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:13:10.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residential Broadband Availability: Evidence from Kentucky and North Carolina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Mitch Renkow
Mitch Renkow*
Affiliation:
The Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, North Carolina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I analyze the determinants of county-level broadband availability to gauge the extent to which the rural-urban broadband gap has narrowed and the factors that underlie that narrowing. Using data that have been collected by organizations tracking and promoting broadband in Kentucky and North Carolina, I find that in both states the rural-urban availability gap has indeed narrowed substantially, although there appears to be a limit on the extent to which broadband service will extend into the least densely populated counties. Among rural counties, availability rates increase systematically with the size of the county's urbanized population.

Keywords

broadband availabilitydigital dividerural development
Type
Rural Development and Broadband Use
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , August 2011 , pp. 145 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, D.J., and Burnstein, D.E. 2003. “Broadband Adoption in the United States: An Empirical Analysis.” SSRN Working Paper (March). Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=386100 (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
Baller, J., and Lide, C. 2008. “Capturing the Promise of Broadband for North Carolina and America.” Report prepared for e-NC Authority, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office (CBO). 2005. “Financing Universal Telephone Service.” CBO Paper. Washington, D.C: Congressional Budget Office.Google Scholar
Connected Nation. 2008. “The Economic Impact of Stimulating Broadband Nationally.” A Report from Connected Nation, Inc. Available at http://www.connectednation.com/research/economic_impact_study/index.php (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
ConnectKentucky. 2008. “Setting the Pace: Accelerating Broadband Expansion. 2008 Progress Report.” Frankfort, KY: ConnectKentucky. Available at http://www.connectkentucky.org/_documents/ConnectKentuckyProgressReport2008.pdf (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
Cooke, M.L. 1948. “The Early Days of the Rural Electrification Idea: 1914–1936.” The American Political Science Review 42(3): 431–447.Google Scholar
Crandall, R., Lehr, W., and Litan, R. 2007. “The Effects of Broadband Deployment on Output and Employment: A Cross-sectional Analysis of U.S. Data.” Issues in Economic Policy No. 6. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
e-NC Authority. 2004. “Telecom Service Provider Mapping System: User Guide.” e-NC Authority, Raleigh, NC. Available at http://e-nc.org/pdf/eNC_Telecom_Maps_HelpGuide_021104.pdf (accessed May 2008).Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2007. “Encouraging Broadband Deployment from the Bottom Up.” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 37(1): 69–72.Google Scholar
Flamm, K., and Chaudhuri, A. 2005. “Analysis of the Determinants of Broadband Access.” Paper presented at the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. 1957. “Hybrid Com: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change.” Econometrica 25(4): 501–522.Google Scholar
Grubesic, T.H. 2004. “The Geodemographic Correlates of Broadband Access and Availability in the United States.” Telematics and Informatics 21(4): 335–358.Google Scholar
Hall, B.H., and Khan, B. 2003. “Adoption of New Technology.” In Jones, D., ed., New Economy Handbook. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heath, T. 1999. “Telecom Infrastructure: The New Facility Backbone.” Site Selection Online. Available at http://www.siteselection.com/sshighlites/0999/p751/ (accessed July 2008).Google Scholar
Kandilov, I.T., and Renkow, M. 2010. “Infrastructure Investment and Rural Economic Development: An Evaluation of USDA's Broadband Loan Program.” Growth and Change 41(2): 165–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, S. 2001. “Rural Free Delivery as a Critical Test of Alternative Models of American Political Development.” Studies in American Political Development 15(Spring): 103–112.Google Scholar
Kruger, L.G. 2007. “Broadband Loan and Grant Programs in the USDA's Rural Utilities Service.” CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Kruger, L.G. 2009. “Broadband Loan and Grant Programs in the USDA's Rural Utilities Service.” CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Malecki, E.J. 2003. “Digital Development in Rural Areas: Potentials and Pitfalls.” Journal of Rural Studies 19(2): 201–214.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P. 1997. “Procuring Universal Telephone Service.” In Commission, Industry, ed., Conference Proceedings of the 1997 Industry Economics Conference, AGPS, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Mills, B.F., and Whitacre, B.E. 2003. “Understanding the Nonmetropolitan-Metropolitan Digital Divide.” Growth and Change 34(2): 219–243.Google Scholar
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2005. “Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART), Department of Agriculture PART Assessments.” Office of the President, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/pma/agriculture.pdf (accessed January 2009).Google Scholar
Parker, E.B. 1990. “Communications Investment to Promote Economic Development.” In Rowley, T.D. and Reid, J.N., eds., Infrastructure Investment and Economic Development: Rural Strategies for the 1990s. Staff Report No. AGES 9069, Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Partridge, M., Ali, K., and Olfert, M.R. 2010. “Rural-to-Urban Commuting: Three Degrees of Integration.” Growth and Change 41(2): 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pociask, S.B. 2005. “Broadband Use by Rural Small Businesses.” Report to the U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Prieger, J. 2003. “The Supply Side of the Digital Divide: Is There Equal Availability in the Broadband Internet Access Market?” Economic Inquiry 41(2): 346–363.Google Scholar
Renkow, M. 2007. “Infrastructure Investment and Rural Development,” In Gardner, B.L. and Sumner, D.A., eds., Agricultural Policy for 2007 Farm Bill and Beyond. Washington, D.C.: The AEI Press.Google Scholar
Renkow, M., and Hoover, D.M. 2000. “Commuting, Migration, and Rural-Urban Population Dynamics.” Journal of Regional Science 40(2): 261–287.Google Scholar
Rodell, M. 1975. “Growth Centers-Two Recent Contributions.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 23(3): 523–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shideler, D., Badasyan, N., and Taylor, L. 2007. “The Economic Impact of Broadband Deployment in Kentucky.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Regional Economic Development 3(2): 88–118.Google Scholar
Staihr, B. 2000. “Rural America's Stake in the Digital Economy.” The Main Street Economist (May). Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO. Available at http://www.kc.frb.org/RuralCenter/mainstreet/MSE_0500.pdf (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
Stenberg, P.S. 2002. “Communications and the Internet in Rural America.” Agricultural Outlook (June-July). USDA-Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/JuneJuly2002/ao292h.pdf (accessed May 2008).Google Scholar
U.S. General Accountability Office (GAO). 2006. “Broadband Deployment Is Extensive throughout the United States, but It Is Difficult to Assess the Extent of Deployment Gaps in Rural Areas.” Report No. GAO-06-426, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Wallstein, S. 2005. “Broadband Penetration: An Empirical Analysis of State and Federal Policies.” Working Paper 05-12, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Whitacre, B.E. 2008. “Factors Influencing the Temporal Diffusion of Broadband Adoption: Evidence from Oklahoma.” Annals of Regional Science 42(3): 661–679.Google Scholar
Whitacre, B.E., and Mills, B.F. 2007. “Infrastructure and the Rural-Urban Divide in High-Speed Residential Internet Access.” International Regional Science Review 30(3): 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitacre, B.E., and Mahasuweerachai, P. 2008. “Small Broadband Providers and Federal Assistance Programs: Solving the Digital Divide?” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 38(3): 254–267.Google Scholar
Wood, L. 2008. “Rural Broadband: The Provider Matters.” Telecommunications Policy 32(5): 326–339.Google Scholar