Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:17:22.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Watershed Nutrient Trading Under Asymmetric Information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Robert C. Johansson
Robert C. Johansson*
Affiliation:
The Resource and Environmental Policy Branch, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Get access

Abstract

This study evaluates first- and second-best trading policies for regulating watershed phosphorus under asymmetric information. The trading policies are differentiated on the degree to which regulators observe point and nonpoint source abatement efforts. The efficiency losses attributable to these informational asymmetries and those of the second-best policies can be measured in social welfare, and provide regulators the shadow value of foregoing first-best measures. Given representative monitoring costs from national water monitoring programs, it is shown that under asymmetric information, the chosen second-best trading policies outperform first-best policies by 11% in the control of watershed nutrient pollution.

Keywords

nonpoint sourcepermit tradingphosphoruspollutionwatershed
Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , October 2002 , pp. 221 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battese, G. E. (1992). “Frontier Production Functions and Technical Efficiency: A Survey of Empirical Applications in Agricultural Economics.” Agricultural Economics 7, 185–208.Google Scholar
Chung, S. O., Ward, A. D., and Schalk, C. W. (1992). “Evaluation of the Hydrologic Component of the ADAPT Water Table Management Model.” Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 35(2), 571–579.Google Scholar
Coelli, T. J. (1995). “Recent Developments in Frontier Modelling and Efficiency Measurement.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39(3), 219–245.Google Scholar
Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC). (1998). Crop Residue Management. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Online. Available at http://www.ctic.purdue.edu.Google Scholar
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and Consumer Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Environomics. (1999, November). “A Summary of U.S. Effluent Trading and Offset Projects.” Report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Faeth, P. (2000). Fertile Ground: Nutrient Trading's Potential to Cost-Effectively Improve Water Quality. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Farzin, Y. H., and Kaplan, J. D. (1999). “Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Under Incomplete and Costly Information.” Findazuine Eni Enrico Mattei Note di Lavoro. Pub. No. 32/99, Milan, Italy. Online. Available at http://www.feem.it.Google Scholar
Feather, P., and Hellerstein, D. (1997). “Calibrating Benefit Function Transfer to Assess the Conservation Reserve Program.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, 151–162.Google Scholar
Garvie, D., and Keeler, A. W. (1994). “Incomplete Enforcement with Endogenous Regulatory Choice.” Journal of Public Economics 55, 141–162.Google Scholar
Gowda, P. H., Ward, A., White, D., Lyon, J., and Desmond, E. (1999). “The Sensitivity of ADAPT Model Predictions of Streamflows to Parameters Used to Define Hydrologic Response Units.” Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 42(2), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L., Feather, P., and Shank, D. (1999, October). “Valuation of Agriculture's Multi-Site Environmental Impacts: An Application to Pheasant Hunting.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 28(2), 199–207.Google Scholar
Heimlich, R. E., and Claassen, R. (1998, April). “Agricultural Conservation Policy at a Crossroads.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27(1), 95–107.Google Scholar
Hoag, D. L., and Hughes-Popp, J. S. (1997). “Theory and Practice of Pollution Credit Trading in Water Quality Management.” Review of Agricultural Economics 19(2), 252–262.Google Scholar
Horan, R. D., Shortle, J. S., and Abler, D. G. (1998). “Ambient Taxes when Polluters Have Multiple Choices.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 186–199.Google Scholar
Johansson, R. C. (2000). “Minnesota Valley Phosphorus: A Case for Permit Trading.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.Google Scholar
Loomis, J. B. (1997, December). “Panel Estimators to Combine Revealed and Stated Preference Dichotomous Choice Data.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(2), 233–245.Google Scholar
Malik, A. S. (1990). “Markets for Pollution Control when Firms Are Noncompliant.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18, 97–106.Google Scholar
Malik, A. S. (1993). “Self-Reporting and the Design of Policies for Regulating Stochastic Pollution.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24, 241–257.Google Scholar
Malik, A. S., Letson, D., and Crutchfield, S. R. (1993). “Point/Nonpoint Source Trading of Pollution Abatement: Choosing the Right Trading Ratio.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 959–967.Google Scholar
Mathews, L. G., Homans, F. R., and Easter, K. W. (1999). “Reducing Phosphorus Pollution in the Minnesota River: How Much Is It Worth?” Staff Paper No. P99-4, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul. Online. Available at http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/mn/p99-04.pdf.Google Scholar
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). (1999). “Phosphorus in the Minnesota River.” MPCA report, St. Paul, MN. Online. Available at http://www.pca.state.mn.us.Google Scholar
Moledina, A. A., Coggins, J. S., and Polasky, S. (2002). “Dynamic Environmental Policy with Strategic Firms: Prices versus Quantities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (in press).Google Scholar
Montgomery, W. D. (1972). “Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs.” Journal of Economic Theory 5, 395–418.Google Scholar
Mulla, D. J. (1998). “Phosphorus in Surface Waters: The Minnesota River Case Study.” Better Crops with Plant Food 82(1), 8–11. [Potash and Phosphate Institute.]Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M. O., Horan, R. D., and Smith, M. E. (1999). “Economics of Water Quality Protection from Nonpoint Sources: Theory and Practice.” AER Pub. No. 782, U.S. Department of Agriculture/Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M. O., Osborn, C. T., and Konyar, K. (1994). “Land Retirement as a Tool for Reducing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution.” Land Economics 70(1), 77–87.Google Scholar
Ross and Associates Consulting. (2000). “Lower Boise River Effluent Trading Demonstration Project: Summary of Participant Recommendations for a Trading Framework.” Report prepared for Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, Boise, ID.Google Scholar
Segerson, K. (1988). “Uncertainty and Incentives for Nonpoint Pollution Control.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, 87–98.Google Scholar
Senjem, N. (1997). “Pollutant Trading for Water Quality Improvement: A Policy Evaluation.” Policy paper, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
Sharpley, A. N., Daniel, T., Sims, T., Lemunyon, J., Stevens, R., and Parry, R. (1999). “Agricultural Phosphorus and Eutrophication.” ARS Pub. No. 149, U.S. Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Shortle, J. S., and Dunn, J. W. (1986). “Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 668–677.Google Scholar
Smith, R. B. W., and Tomasi, T. D. (1999, April). “Multiple Agents, and Agricultural Nonpoint-Source Water Pollution Control Policies.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 28(1), 37–13.Google Scholar
Stavins, R. N. (1995). “Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 133–148.Google Scholar
Stranlund, J. K., and Dhanda, K. K. (1999). “Endogenous Monitoring and Enforcement of a Transferable Emissions Permit System.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38, 267–282.Google Scholar
Taff, S. J., and Senjem, N. (1996). “Increasing Regulators’ Confidence in Point-Nonpoint Pollutant Trading Schemes.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association 32(6), 1187–1193.Google Scholar
Tiffany, D. G. (1999, January). “Payments for Pounds Program: An Economic Analysis of Program Performance.” Staff Report, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). “The Quality of Our Nation's Waters.” Pub. No. EPA841-S-00-001, EPA/Office of Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001a). “Animal Feeding Operations Unified Strategy.” EPA, Office of Wastewater Management, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://cfpubl.epa.gov/npdes/afo/ustrategy.cfm?program_id=7.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001b). “National Nonpoint Source Watershed Project Studies.” EPA, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://h2osparc.wq.ncsu.edu/319index.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). “Effluent Trading in Watersheds: Policy Statement.” EPA, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/trading.htm.Google Scholar
Van Egteren, H., and Weber, M. (1996). “Marketable Permits, Market Power, and Cheating.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(2), 161–173.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. L. (1974). “Prices vs. Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 41(4), 477–491.Google Scholar
Xepapadeas, A. P. (1991). “Environmental Policy Under Imperfect Information: Incentives and Moral Hazard.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20, 113–126.Google Scholar
Yiridoe, E. K., and Weersink, A. (1998, October). “Marginal Costs of Reducing Groundwater-N Pollution with Intensive and Extensive Farm Management Choices.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27(2), 169–185.Google Scholar