Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:00:29.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Direct and Indirect Effects of ‘Locally Grown’ on Consumers’ Attitudes towards Agri-Food Products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Domenico Dentoni ,
Glynn T. Tonsor ,
Roger J. Calantone  and
H. Christopher Peterson
Domenico Dentoni
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan
Glynn T. Tonsor
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan
Roger J. Calantone
Affiliation:
Business and Chair of the Department of Marketing in the Eli Broad Graduate School of Business at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan
H. Christopher Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics and Director of the MSU Product Center at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan
Get access

Abstract

Recent agricultural economics literature has largely analyzed consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for many credence attributes, including place of origin, organic, locally grown, environment-friendly, fair trade, and animal welfare. In this study, we instead attempt to analyze why consumers value “locally grown,” which is a credence attribute receiving increasing attention in the market. Specifically, we propose a distinction between the direct effect and the indirect effect of “locally grown” on consumers’ attitudes towards agri-food products to explain consumers’ preferences for locally grown products. We collect data from an experiment with university students and analyze the data with a structural equation modeling methodology.

Keywords

credence attributeslocally growninferencesattitudes
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 384 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaker, D. 1991. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(1): 179–211.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, personality and behavior. Maidenhead [u.a.]: Open Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Qualitative Uncertainty and Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 89(1): 488–500.Google Scholar
Alba, J.W., and Hutchinson, J.W. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.” Journal of Consumer Research 13(3): 411–454.Google Scholar
Alfnes, E, and Rickertsen, K. 2003. “European Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for U.S. Beef in Experimental Auction Markets.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2): 396–405.Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, G., and Lichtenstein, M. 1987. “Social Stereotypes and Information-Processing Strategies: The Impact of Task Complexity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(5): 871–880.Google ScholarPubMed
Baker, G.A., and Burnham, T.A. 2001. “Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis and Implications for Producers and Policy Makers.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(2): 387–403.Google Scholar
Basu, A.K., and Hicks, R.L. 2008. “Label Performance and Willingness to Pay for Fair Trade Coffee: A Cross-National Perspective.” Discussion Papers on Development Policy 125, Center for Development Research, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Darby, K., Batte, M., Ernst, S., and Roe, B. 2008. “Decomposing Local: A Conjoint Analysis of Locally Produced Foods.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(2): 476–486.Google Scholar
Darby, M., and Karni, E. 1973. “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud.” Journal of Law and Economics 16(1): 67–88.Google Scholar
DeEll, J.R., and Prange, R.K. 1992. “Post-Harvest Quality and Sensory Attributes of Organically and Conventionally Grown Apples.” HortScience 27(1): 1096–1099.Google Scholar
De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., and Rayp, G. 2005. “Do Consumer Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair-Trade Coffee.” The Journal of Consumer Affairs 39(2): 363–385.Google Scholar
Eagly, A.H., and Chaiken, S. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes, Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Ehmke, M.T., Lusk, J.L., and Tyner, W. 2008. “The Relative Importance of Preferences for Country-of-Origin in China, France, Niger and the United States.” Paper presented at the 2008 International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
Ericksson, G., Johansson, J., and Chao, P. 1984. “Image Variables in Multi-Attribute Product Evaluations: Country-of-Origin Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 11(2): 694–699.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. 1967. “A Behaviour Theory Approach to the Relations Between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude Toward the Object.” Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York: John Wiley, 389–400.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Froelich, E.J., Carlberg, J.G., and Ward, C.E. 2009. “Willingness-to-Pay for Fresh Brand Name Beef.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(1): 119–137.Google Scholar
The Food Institute. 2008. Consumer Understanding of Buying Local. The Food Institute, Washington, D.C. Available at: www.foodinstitute.com/buyinglocal.cfm.Google Scholar
Han, M., and Terpstra, V. 1988. “Country-Of-Origin Effects for Uni-National and Bi-National Products.” Journal of International Business Studies 19(2): 235–255.Google Scholar
Hoffman, D.H., and Novak, T.P. 1996. “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations.” Journal of Marketing 60(3): 50–68.Google Scholar
Hong, S., and Wyer, R.S. 1989. “Effects of Country-of-Origin and Product-Attribute Information on Product Evaluation: An Information Processing Perspective.” Journal of Consumer Research 16(1): 175–187.Google Scholar
Huang, C.L. 1996. “Consumer Preferences and Attitudes towards Organically Grown Produce.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 23(3): 331–350.Google Scholar
IDDBA. 2008. What's In Store Report 2008. International Dairy Deli Bakery Association. Madison, Wisconsin. Available at: www.iddba.org.Google Scholar
Johansson, J., and Nebenzahl, I. 1986. “Multinational Production: Effect on Brand Value.” Journal of International Business Studies 17(3): 101–126.Google Scholar
Johnson, E.J., and Russo, J.E. 1984. “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information.” Journal of Consumer Research 11(6): 542–550.Google Scholar
Kanter, C., Messer, K.D., and Kaiser, H.M. 2008. “Do rBST-Free and Organic Milk Stigmatize Conventionally Produced Milk?” Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the 2008 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Keller, K.L. 1998. Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring and Managing Brand Equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kirmani, A., and Rao, A.R. 2000. “No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality.” Journal of Marketing 64(1): 66–79.Google Scholar
Lee, D.Y. 2000. “Retail Bargaining Behavior of American and Chinese Customers.” European Journal of Marketing 34(1): 190–206.Google Scholar
Li, W., and Wyer, R. 1994. “The Role of Country of Origin in Product Evaluations: Informational and Standard-of-Comparison Effects.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 3(2): 187–212.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., McCluskey, J.J., and Mittelhammer, R.C. 2002. “Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco-Labeled Apples?” The Journal of Consumer Affairs 36(2): 203–219.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., and Hine, S. 2002. “Discovering Niche Markets: A Comparison of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local (Colorado Grown), Organic, and GMO-Free Products.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(3): 477–487.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., and Umberger, W.L. 2005. “A Choice Experiment Model for Beef: What U.S. Consumer Responses Tell Us about Relative Preferences for Food Safety, Country-of-Origin Labeling and Traceability.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(1): 49–63.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., and Umberger, W.J. 2007. “Estimating Consumer Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin Labeling.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28(2): 287–301.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., Daniel, M.S., Mark, D.R., and Lusk, C.L. 2001. “Alternative Calibration and Auction Institutions for Predicting Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Non-Genetically Modified Corn Chips.” Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics 26(1): 40–57.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., Roosen, J., and Fox, J.A. 2003. “Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(1): 16–29.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., Brown, J., Mark, T., Proseku, I., Thompson, R., and Welsh, J. 2006. “Consumer Behavior, Public Policy, and Country-of-Origin Labeling.” Review of Agricultural Economics 28(2): 284–292.Google Scholar
Lutz, R. 1991. “The Role of Attitude Theory in Marketing”, in: Kassarjian, H.H. and Robertson, J.J., eds., Perspectives in Consumer Behavior (4th ed.), Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Manalo, A.B. 1990. “Assessing the Importance of Apple Attributes: An Agricultural Application of Conjoint Analysis.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(2): 118–124.Google Scholar
Mehinnagic, E., Royera, G.E., Bertrand, D., Symoneaux, R., Laurens, F., and Jourjon, F. 2003. “Relationship Between Sensory Analysis, Penetrometry and Visible NIR Spectroscopy of Apples Belonging to Different Cultivars.” Food Quality and Preference 14(1): 473–484.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. 1986. “The Choice Theory Approach to Marketing Research.” Marketing Science 5(1): 275–297.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. 1970. “Information and Consumer Behavior.” The Journal of Political Economy 78(2): 311–329.Google Scholar
Nimon, W., and Beghin, J. 1999. “Are Eco-Labels Valuable? Evidence from the Apparel Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(4): 801–811.Google Scholar
Obermiller, C., and Spangenberg, E. 1989. “Exploring the Effects of Origin Labels: An Information Processing Framework.” Advances in Consumer Research 16(1): 454–459.Google Scholar
Olson, J. 1978. “Inferential Belief Formation in the Cue Utilization Process.” Advances in Consumer Research 5(1): 706–713.Google Scholar
Park, C.W., and Lessig, V.P. 1981. “Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics.” Journal of Consumer Research 8(9): 223–230.Google Scholar
Peterson, R.A., and Jolibert, A.J.P. 1995. “A Meta-Analysis of Country of Origin Effects.” Journal of International Business Studies 49(4): 883–900.Google Scholar
Pharr, J. 2005. “Synthesizing Country-of-Origin Research from the Last Decade: Is the Concept Still Salient in an Era of Global Brands?” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 13(4): 34–45.Google Scholar
Punj, G.N. and Staelin, R. 1983. “A Model of Consumer Information Search Behavior for New Automobiles.” Journal of Consumer Research 9(1): 366–380.Google Scholar
Rao, A.R., and Monroe, K.B. 1988. “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Research 15(2): 253–264.Google Scholar
Rao, A.R., and Monroe, K.B. 1989. “The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review.” Journal of Marketing Research 26(3): 351–357.Google Scholar
Rosenman, R.E., and Wilson, W. 1991. “Quality Differential and Prices: Are Cherries Lemons?” The Journal of Industrial Economics 39(6): 649–658.Google Scholar
Schroeder, T., Tonsor, G., Pennings, J., and Mintert, J. 2007. “Consumer Food Safety Risk Perceptions and Attitudes: Impacts on Beef Consumption across Countries.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 7(1): 19–32.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. 1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theory and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries”, in Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25(1): 1–65. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I., and Gross, B.L. 1991. Consumption Values and Market Choices: Theory and Applications. Cincinnati, Ohio: Southwestern Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. 1998. “Consumer Demand for Organic Foods: What We Know and What We Need to Know.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(5): 1113–1118.Google Scholar
Tonsor, G., Schroeder, T., Fox, J., and Biere, A. 2005. “European Preferences for Beef Steak Attributes.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(2): 367–380.Google Scholar
Umberger, W.J., Feuz, D.M., Calkins, C.R., and Stiz, B.M. 2003. “Country-of-Origin Labeling of Beef Products: U.S. Consumers Perceptions.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 34(1): 103–116.Google Scholar
Van der Lans, I., Van Ittersum, K., De Cicco, A., and Loseby, M. 2001. “The Role of Region of Origin and EU Certificates of Origin in Consumer Evaluation of Food Products.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 28(4): 451–477.Google Scholar
Van Ittersum, K., Candel, M.J.J.M., and Meulenberg, M.T.G. 2003. “The Influence of the Image of a Product's Region of Origin on Product Evaluation.” Journal of Business Research 56(3): 215–226.Google Scholar
Verbeke, W. 2005. “Consumer Acceptance of Functional Foods: Socio-Demographic, Cognitive and Attitudinal Determinants.” Food Quality and Preference 16(1): 45–57.Google Scholar
Verlegh, P., and Steenkamp, J.B. 1999. “A Review and Meta-Analysis of Country-of-Origin Research.” Journal of Economic Psychology 20(5): 521–546.Google Scholar