Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:30:29.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The United Kingdom government's ‘business case’ approach to the regulation of retirement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2010

MATTHEW FLYNN
MATTHEW FLYNN*
Affiliation:
The Business School, Middlesex University, London, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Matthew Flynn, The Business School, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, LondonNW4 4BT, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, the United Kingdom government set a ‘default’ retirement age of 65 years after which an employer can compulsorily retire workers, and made it obligatory for employers to consider the ‘business case’ for any employees' requests to continue in work after the default age. This is a ‘light touch’ approach to reducing age discrimination at the workplace and to changing the established ‘culture of retirement’. While encouraging productive staff to remain in post beyond 65 years of age, it leaves implementation of the policies and achievement of their goals to the discretion of employers. This article explores how British employers are adapting to the law, by drawing from interviews with 70 managers from a wide range of organisations. Overall the collected evidence shows the limits of a business case approach as a means of changing employers' practices. It was found that line managers, rather than senior managers or human resources specialists, generally decide which employees can stay employed after age 65 years. Consequently, the research suggests that opportunities for workers aged 65 or more years to stay employed are more the result of individual arrangements with their immediate managers than changes in an organisation's policies and practices. Altogether, the evidence suggests that consolidation rather than eradication of the established retirement culture has occurred.

Keywords

retirementbusiness caseequalitypublic policyworkemployer practices
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , April 2010 , pp. 421 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrowsmith, J. and McGoldrick, A. E. 1997. A flexible future for older workers? Personnel Review, 26, 4, 258–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H., Parry, J. and Taylor, R. 2004. Working After State Pension Age: Qualitative Research. Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Bunt, K., Adams, L., Carter, K. and Hopkins, I. 2005. Age Positive Business Case Studies. DWP Age Positive Group, Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
Chiu, W. C. K., Chan, A. W., Snape, E. and Redman, T. 2001. Age stereotypes and discriminatory attitudes towards older workers: an East–West comparison. Human Relations, 54, 5, 629–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colling, T. 1997. Collective Bargaining and Equal Opportunities in Europe: The Case of British Gas in the United Kingdom. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin.Google Scholar
Coupland, C., Tempest, S. and Barnatt, C. 2008. What are the implications of the new UK age discrimination legislation for research and practice. Human Resource Management Journal, 18, 4, 423–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions 2009. Building a Society for All Ages. Stationery Office, Norwich, UK. Available online at http://www.hmg.gov.uk/media/33830/fullreport.pdf [Accessed 1 November 2009].Google Scholar
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) 2005. Equality and Diversity, Coming of Age: Consultation on the Employment Equality Regulations 2006. DTI, London.Google Scholar
Dickens, L. 2006. Beyond the business case: a three-pronged approach to equality action. Human Resource Management Journal, 9, 1, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doling, J., Finer, C. J. and Maltby, T. 2005. Ageing Matters: European Policy Lessons from the East. Ashgate, Farnham, UK.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. 2003. Assessing anti-ageism routes to older worker re-engagement. Work, Employment and Society, 17, 1, 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, C. 2008. The dangers and limitations of equality agendas as means for tackling old age prejudice. Ageing & Society, 28, 8, 1133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, C., Loretto, W. and White, P. 2000. Ageism, early exit and British trade unions. Industrial Relations Journal, 31, 3, 220–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, I. 1996. The privatisation of sex equality policy. In Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (eds), Women in Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 145–62.Google Scholar
IRS Management Review 2001. Employing older workers: the business case, the business reasons for and benefits of, establishing an age-diverse workforce. IRS Management Review, 21, 6–15.Google Scholar
Itzin, C., Phillipson, C. and Laczko, F. 1993. Age Barriers at Work: Maximising the Potential of Mature and Older Workers. Metropolitan Authorities Recruitment Agency, Solihull, UK.Google Scholar
Kohli, M., Rein, M., Guillemard, A. and Gunsteren, H. 1991. Time for Retirement: Comparative Studies of Early Exit from the Labour Force. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Laughlin, R. 1991. Environmental disturbances and organizational transitions and transformations: some alternative models. Organization Studies, 12, 2, 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loretto, W. and White, P. 2005. Older workers and the Scottish labour market: an analysis of employment practices and employers' attitudes. Paper presented at the ESRC Seminar Series The Employability of Older Workers; Employers' Approaches, 16 February, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loretto, W. and White, P. 2006. Employers' attitudes, practices and policies towards older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 16, 3, 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, P., Hallier, J. and Glover, I. 1998. Divestment or investment? The contradictions of HRM in relation to older employees. Human Resource Management Journal, 8, 1, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, N. L. and D'Amico, R. J. 1986. Employment and wage effects of involuntary job separation. Academy of Management Review, 76, 2, 373–77.Google Scholar
McIntyre, R., Bartle, S., Landis, D. and Dansby, M. 2002. The effects of equal opportunity fairness attitudes on job satisfaction, organizational commitment and perceived work group efficacy. Military Psychology, 14, 4, 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNair, S. and Flynn, M. 2005. The Age Dimension of Employer Practices: Employer Case Studies. Department of Trade and Industry, London.Google Scholar
McNair, S., Flynn, M. and Dutton, Y. 2007. Employer Responses to an Ageing Workforce: A Qualitative Study. Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Meadows, P. 2004. Retirement Ages in the UK: A Review of the Literature. Department of Trade and Industry, London.Google Scholar
Metcalf, H. and Meadows, P. 2006. Survey of Employers' Policies, Practices and Preferences Relating to Age. Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
National Statistics 2002. UK Standard Industrial Classification of Economic Activities SIC(92). National Statistics, London. Available online at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods_quality/sic/contents.asp [Accessed 3 November 2009].Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2006. Live Longer, Work Longer: Synthesis Report. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C. 1987. The transition into retirement. In Cohen, G. (ed.), Social Change and the Life Course. Tavistock, London, 156–83.Google Scholar
Riach, K. 2006. Older workers: learning from three international experiences. Social Policy and Society, 5, 4, 551–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, R., Metcalf, H. and Forth, J. 2007. The Business Case for Equal Opportunities: An Econometric Investigation. Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. and Tracy, C. S. 1998. Health and productivity of older workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 24, 2, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sargeant, M. 1999. Age Discrimination in Employment. Institute of Employment Rights, London.Google Scholar
Sargeant, M. 2008. The Law on Age Discrimination in the EU. Kluwer Law, London.Google Scholar
Smeaton, D. and McKay, S. 2003. Working After State Pension Age: Quantitative Analysis. Department for Work and Pensions, Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
Snape, E. and Redman, T. 2003. Too old or too young: the impact of perceived age discrimination. Human Resource Management Journal, 13, 1, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. 2002. New Policies for Older Workers. Policy, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. 2003. Population ageing: implications for employment and the economy in the UK regions. Paper for Regions for All Ages Conference, 11 March, Glasgow. Available online at http://www.ageconcern.org.uk/AgeConcern/Documents/regions_pop_ageing_taylor.pdf[Accessed 1 November 2009].Google Scholar
Taylor, P. and Urwin, P. 2001. Age and participation in vocational education and training. Work Employment and Society, 15, 4, 763–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. and Walker, A. 1994. The aging workforce: employers' attitudes towards older-people. Work Employment and Society, 8, 4, 569–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. and Walker, A. 1998. Policies and practices towards older workers: a framework for comparative research. Human Resource Management Journal, 8, 3, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickerstaff, S., Cox, J. and Keen, L. 2003. Employers and the management of retirement. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 3, 271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright Trust 1997. Decentralisation and Devolution: The Impact on Equal Opportunities at Work. The Wainwright Trust, Standon, Ware, UK.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 1990. The benefits of old age? Age discrimination and social security. In McEwen, E. (ed.), Age: The Unrecognised Discrimination. Age Concern, London, 58–70.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. and Higo, M. 2007. Why Do Japanese Workers Remain in the Labour Force So Long? Center for Retirement Research, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar