Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:31:38.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equity Release Schemes and Equity Extraction by Elderly Households in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Beverley Mullings  and
Chris Hamnett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The policy and popular debates suggest that the housing equity of elderly home-owners has provided them with a considerable stock of wealth which will influence the future social structure of the United Kingdom, as wealth is transferred to a wider cross-section of British society through inheritance. While various estimates suggest that the distribution of intergenerational transfers of equity is set to widen in the future (Hamnett, Harmer and Williams 1991), it is not known whether the rate of growth of housing inheritance will continue at the pace set in the 1970s and 1980s. This is due to the process of equity extraction by elderly persons, largely from their housing assets. The extent to which one form of equity extraction (formal equity release schemes) has influenced future housing inheritances is the focus of this paper. Drawing on data collected during a postal survey of institutions offering formal equity release schemes, and secondary literature, we conclude that such schemes are unlikely to have a substantial impact on future intergenerational transfers of housing equity. The equity withdrawn under existing schemes is minimal and is likely to remain so due to lack of demand and inflexibility in the supply of existing schemes. In this paper we shall examine the participation of elderly persons in, and the market for, equity release schemes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 413 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bosanquet, N., Laing, W. and Propper, C. 1990. Elderly Consumers in Britain: Europe's Poor Relations? Charting the Grey Economy in the 1990's. Laing and Buisson: London.Google Scholar
Building Societies Association, 1989. Directory of Members. BSA, London.Google Scholar
Couch, G. 1991. Capital adequacy — regulators v the market. Mortgage Finance Gazette. Conference, 66–7.Google Scholar
The Economist. 1988. Growing rich again (leading article), 04.Google Scholar
Falkingham, J. and Victor, C. 1991. The myth of the woopie?: incomes, and the elderly, and targeting welfare. Welfare State Programme Paper No.55. STICERD, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
Fleiss, A. 1985. Home Ownership Alternatives for the Elderly. Department of the Environment, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Forest, R. and Murie, A. 1989. Differential accumulation: wealth, inheritance and housing policy reconsidered. Policy and Politics, 1 (1),25–39.Google Scholar
Hamnett, C 1990. A nation of inheritors? Housing inheritance wealth and inequality in Britain. Journal of Social Policy, 20 (4), 509–6.Google Scholar
Hamnett, C., Harmer, M. and Williams, P. 1991. Safe as Houses; Housing Inheritance in Britain. Paul Chapman, London.Google Scholar
Hayashida, C. and Sasaki, H. 1986. The Musashino plan: Japan's home equity conversion program for social, health and financial services. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 1, 255–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, C. 1990a. Interview with Cecil Hinton.Google Scholar
Hinton, C. 1990b. Using rour Home as Capital. Age Concern, Surrey.Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. 1986. The national potential of home equity conversion. The Gerontologist, 26 (5), 496–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendig, H. 1984. Housing tenure and generational equity. Ageing and Society, 4 (5), 249–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautro. 1990. Enforcement Bulletin no. 5, Lautro, London.Google Scholar
Leather, P. 1990. The potential and implications of home equity release in old age. Housing Studies, 5(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Leather, P. and Wheeler, R. 1988. Making Use of Home Equity in Old Age. BAS, London.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, S., Means, R. and Leather, P. 1990. Housing in Later Life: The Housing Finance Implications of an Ageing Society. SAUS, Bristol.Google Scholar
Munich Reinsurance Company. Undated. Equity House Value Release Mechanisms. Munich Reinsurance Company, London.Google Scholar
Oldman, C. 1991. Paying for Care. Personal Sources of Funding Care. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1978). Domestic property and social class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2, 233–51.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1984) Beyond housing classes, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 8, 202–29.Google Scholar
Scholen, K. and Chen, Y. (eds). 1980. Unlocking Home Equity for the Elderly. Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
The Independent. 1991. ‘Hope for income plan victims’ by Scott, M. 28 09. 1991.Google Scholar
The Independent on Sunday. 1991. ‘Suspended advisers are back in homes business’ by Bibby, A., 20 11 1991.Google Scholar
The Observer, 05 1986, by Ascherson, N.Google Scholar
Torrey, B. 1988. Assets of the aged: clues and issues. Population and Development Review, 14 (3), 489–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venti, S. and Wise, D. 1991. Aging and the income value of housing wealth. Journal of Public Economics. 44, 371–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R. 1986. Home equity conversion: development, policy and issues. Housing Review, 35 (1) 01—02 1.Google Scholar